gregory

gregory — CS2 Stats

BS76561199390549777[U:1:1430284049]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

926Tracked matches58%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,545Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24214 of 220452 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,395 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 24,545 → 24,545
0Faceit ELO · 1,395 → 1,395
+19Tracked matches · now 926
+2.5ppWin rate · 55.2% → 57.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 3 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,545 +431 3 Jul13 Sept · 10 days played
23,54425,124peak 25,1243 Jul13 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,395 +0 6 Sept13 Sept · 3 observations
1,3951,395peak 1,3956 Sept13 Sept
25,124Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,395Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-07-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,395
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 136 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 579 below peak (25,124)
  • -579 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 455 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgregoryFACEITLevel 8 · 1,395 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,545 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,395csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning57
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51418Last 10051%Win rateWLWTWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · −12ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 1073 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.5
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.7
Utility6.5
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact7.6

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time528ms+3ms
first ⅓ avg 525ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–0 · cache, 5 Sept
50%Best headshot accuracy · 5–0 · cache, 27 Aug
336msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · inferno, 28 Jul
13–0Biggest win · cache, 5 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
73In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 16dust2Weakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC37162143%0.02
infernoS1612475%0.02
cacheB157847%0.02
ancientS96367%0.04
anubisA85363%-0.01
dust2C83538%0.01
nukeC52340%0.00
train1010%-0.01
overpass1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

238Matches
50%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
87.1ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9251%1.3017.2
Ancient4141%1.1017.3
Dust23664%1.2517.0
Inferno2741%1.1316.0
Anubis2450%1.1216.7
Overpass850%1.2815.4
Nuke540%0.8313.4
Cache450%1.9421.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
524msReaction time
42.3%T opening success
43.6%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
7.93HE damage / grenade
16.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0429%17 Sept
ancient3–13-0.109%16 Sept
mirage13–50.1116%16 Sept
inferno12–120.0825%16 Sept
mirage13–70.0021%16 Sept
mirage13–100.0117%16 Sept
mirage13–50.0333%16 Sept
mirage3–130.0535%16 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0122%15 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0316%15 Sept
inferno13–6-0.0225%15 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0028%15 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0126%15 Sept
train12–12-0.0123%15 Sept
cache13–110.0819%14 Sept
mirage0–13-0.1012%14 Sept
mirage13–60.1017%13 Sept
ancient13–30.0218%12 Sept
cache10–130.0216%12 Sept
anubis13–50.0618%12 Sept
mirage12–12-0.0615%11 Sept
mirage13–100.0325%11 Sept
ancient13–60.1222%10 Sept
mirage8–130.0324%10 Sept
anubis13–60.0316%10 Sept
mirage5–130.0613%10 Sept
inferno13–50.0117%10 Sept
mirage13–80.0522%9 Sept
inferno7–13-0.079%9 Sept
dust211–13-0.0215%9 Sept
mirage13–40.0225%8 Sept
inferno14–160.0416%8 Sept
ancient19–160.0819%7 Sept
mirage9–130.0914%6 Sept
mirage13–50.0419%6 Sept
cache13–00.1918%5 Sept
dust212–16-0.0015%5 Sept
mirage4–130.1317%5 Sept
inferno13–50.1116%5 Sept
overpass5–9-0.0011%5 Sept
cache10–13-0.0025%5 Sept
mirage13–30.0417%4 Sept
anubis1–13-0.190%4 Sept
ancient13–30.0726%2 Sept
mirage9–130.0314%1 Sept
ancient9–130.0313%30 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0417%30 Aug
mirage9–130.0517%28 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0122%28 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0018%28 Aug
mirage16–140.0010%27 Aug
mirage20–220.0215%27 Aug
cache5–00.0050%27 Aug
cache13–70.1420%26 Aug
cache13–20.0938%26 Aug
cache1–8-0.1136%26 Aug
nuke3–12-0.0128%23 Aug
inferno13–100.026%23 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0020%17 Aug
mirage13–50.008%11 Aug
mirage4–100.0418%8 Aug
mirage13–20.0510%8 Aug
inferno16–12-0.0015%7 Aug
ancient7–130.0724%7 Aug
cache15–150.0720%7 Aug
nuke13–30.0719%7 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0230%7 Aug
nuke15–150.0211%7 Aug
anubis13–80.0219%7 Aug
mirage9–130.0416%7 Aug
dust213–2-0.0524%6 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0820%6 Aug
cache1–00.000%6 Aug
mirage13–40.0116%30 Jul
cache3–13-0.0423%30 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0026%30 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0112%30 Jul
dust213–90.1016%30 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0326%29 Jul
nuke13–50.0318%29 Jul
dust28–130.0028%29 Jul
cache1–13-0.0516%29 Jul
inferno13–90.0213%28 Jul
cache13–50.0015%28 Jul
dust215–150.0618%26 Jul
cache10–13-0.039%26 Jul
cache6–13-0.0220%26 Jul
dust213–110.0514%25 Jul
inferno13–100.0017%24 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0012%24 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0719%23 Jul
anubis4–20.0444%23 Jul
anubis10–130.0323%23 Jul
dust25–13-0.0521%23 Jul
inferno13–70.1115%23 Jul
inferno13–40.0513%23 Jul
mirage6–130.0322%4 Jul
inferno13–50.0115%4 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0515%3 Jul
ancient13–30.0415%3 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →