Kunkku

Kunkku — CS2 Stats

FI76561199348660318[U:1:1388394590]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

1,272Tracked matches57%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,846 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,846 → 1,846
+9Tracked matches · now 1,272
0.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 30 Sep 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,722 +1,126 14 Nov28 Mar · 24 days played
19,02623,331peak 23,33114 Nov28 Mar
Faceit ELO: 1,846 +0 13 Sept15 Sept · 2 observations
1,8461,846peak 1,84613 Sept15 Sept
23,331Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,846Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2025-09-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,846
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 155 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKunkkuFACEITLevel 9 · 1,846 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,846csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94
Positioning48
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55423Last 10055%Win rateWLWLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +2.0pp headshot accuracy · +30ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 485ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 490ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 475ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim9.4
Utility7.0
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 45 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4
Positioning4.8
Utility7.0
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time496ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 496ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%+7.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 22 Mar
60%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · vertigo, 25 Aug
344msFastest reaction time · 9–2 · vertigo, 25 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 21 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
148In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 65% over 31ancientWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS31201165%0.03
infernoA2415963%0.04
ancientD1551033%0.01
nukeB105550%0.03
dust2C83538%0.00
vertigoA53260%0.03
overpassC52340%0.05
cache110100%-0.04
anubis110100%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

427Matches
53%Win rate
1.37Avg K/D
93.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage16455%1.3819.7
Inferno10654%1.4319.3
Ancient6444%1.3619.9
Dust25248%1.2817.1
Nuke1759%1.3418.1
Anubis1164%1.3416.8
Vertigo667%1.5221.3
Cache540%1.0314.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
43.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.8%Spray accuracy
88.8%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
512msReaction time
32.6%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
9.36HE damage / grenade
10.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.5927% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–110.0429%17 Sept
mirage5–10-0.0240%12 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0316%10 Sept
nuke3–130.0543%8 Sept
mirage7–130.0020%8 Sept
cache13–11-0.0419%5 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0718%3 Sept
mirage13–90.0024%29 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0244%25 Aug
vertigo9–7-0.0718%25 Aug
vertigo9–20.1560%25 Aug
inferno5–130.0025%24 Aug
nuke8–80.0122%23 Aug
vertigo9–30.0629%23 Aug
mirage19–15-0.0217%18 Aug
vertigo6–90.0825%12 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0417%12 Aug
mirage1–4-0.0629%8 Aug
ancient0–4-0.0514%28 Mar
dust210–13-0.0215%26 Mar
inferno13–30.0014%26 Mar
mirage13–50.1216%26 Mar
mirage6–130.1125%24 Mar
ancient10–130.0418%23 Mar
overpass4–13-0.0035%23 Mar
inferno11–130.0314%23 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0224%22 Mar
mirage13–110.0119%22 Mar
mirage13–40.2223%22 Mar
nuke13–60.0524%22 Mar
ancient16–130.0216%22 Mar
inferno16–140.0617%22 Mar
inferno13–90.0425%22 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0115%22 Mar
inferno13–30.0619%21 Mar
overpass6–10.0225%21 Mar
mirage13–10.0918%21 Mar
inferno13–20.2125%21 Mar
mirage13–4-0.0424%21 Mar
ancient3–10-0.0514%5 Mar
dust210–130.0925%28 Feb
ancient13–160.0218%28 Feb
nuke9–60.0711%28 Feb
ancient8–130.0420%22 Feb
dust214–160.0222%22 Feb
ancient11–130.0414%20 Feb
nuke11–130.0118%18 Feb
dust28–13-0.0817%18 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0313%16 Feb
inferno11–130.0421%16 Feb
inferno16–140.0218%13 Feb
mirage2–8-0.026%13 Feb
inferno11–130.0421%11 Feb
ancient13–110.0115%10 Feb
overpass7–130.0515%7 Feb
nuke13–40.1017%5 Feb
ancient13–90.0714%5 Feb
vertigo6–9-0.0815%4 Feb
ancient13–10.0925%4 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0115%4 Feb
inferno16–130.0823%4 Feb
dust213–110.0419%3 Feb
mirage13–60.0621%3 Feb
mirage10–130.0235%3 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0616%2 Feb
mirage13–11-0.048%2 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0424%1 Feb
anubis13–110.1217%1 Feb
inferno13–70.1622%1 Feb
ancient16–130.0412%1 Feb
nuke10–130.0319%1 Feb
inferno13–20.0919%1 Feb
mirage16–140.0122%1 Feb
mirage9–4-0.074%1 Feb
ancient15–150.0114%1 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0023%1 Feb
ancient0–5-0.0217%31 Jan
inferno13–40.0518%31 Jan
inferno13–80.0110%31 Jan
mirage13–110.0118%31 Jan
overpass13–30.0912%30 Jan
dust216–140.0223%30 Jan
inferno13–60.1320%30 Jan
mirage7–130.0029%28 Jan
mirage13–160.1018%28 Jan
dust213–10-0.0019%26 Jan
inferno7–13-0.0116%25 Jan
mirage13–70.1316%25 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0119%25 Jan
inferno11–130.035%25 Jan
overpass15–150.0920%24 Jan
ancient8–130.0014%23 Jan
inferno13–110.026%23 Jan
mirage13–30.0823%23 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0411%23 Jan
inferno9–50.0714%6 Jan
mirage13–30.1315%6 Jan
dust22–13-0.058%28 Dec
mirage13–100.0531%14 Nov
mirage13–70.0822%30 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches12-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →