tohtori stenfors

tohtori stenfors — CS2 Stats

JM76561199262744516[U:1:1302478788]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

737Tracked matches62%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,651Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14002 of 219961 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 737 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 4 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,651 +7,011 4 May6 Sept · 27 days played
17,57425,651peak 25,6514 May6 Sept
25,761Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-05-04

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 25,651
  • +1,461 over 30 days · improving
  • +906 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,349 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtohtori stenforsFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER25,651 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning60
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT63361Last 10063%Win rateLLWLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · −88ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 456ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 539ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility4.3
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.5

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning6.0
Utility4.3
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time572ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 24.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 11–13 · dust2, 9 Aug
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · mirage, 7 Jun
344msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 7 Jun
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 2 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

21Longest win streak
L2Current streak
63In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 87% over 15ancientWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2517868%0.02
dust2B21111052%0.01
infernoS1513287%0.02
nukeB137654%0.03
ancientC104640%-0.00
cacheB63350%0.02
anubisS65183%0.03
overpass43175%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

19Matches
47%Win rate
0.88Avg K/D
ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.5%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
583msReaction time
44.4%T opening success
44.1%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
12.28HE damage / grenade
2.70Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.6979 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage0–13-0.0222%4 Sept
ancient0–13-0.040%4 Sept
mirage13–60.0629%1 Sept
dust212–16-0.0829%22 Aug
mirage13–50.0117%22 Aug
mirage13–20.0530%13 Aug
dust213–4-0.0712%12 Aug
inferno13–80.0024%12 Aug
inferno13–20.0634%12 Aug
nuke13–40.0930%11 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0420%11 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0218%10 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0722%10 Aug
nuke13–50.0713%10 Aug
dust26–130.0321%10 Aug
mirage7–13-0.039%10 Aug
cache11–13-0.0211%9 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0216%9 Aug
dust211–130.1629%9 Aug
nuke9–130.0428%9 Aug
mirage16–120.1223%9 Aug
mirage16–140.0223%8 Aug
dust213–30.0723%6 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0124%6 Aug
inferno16–140.0321%6 Aug
cache13–90.0421%6 Aug
nuke15–150.0112%6 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0115%6 Aug
inferno13–50.0319%6 Aug
dust27–13-0.0422%5 Aug
ancient13–160.0429%5 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0227%5 Aug
mirage13–110.0120%5 Aug
ancient4–130.0030%4 Aug
inferno13–40.0615%4 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0419%4 Aug
mirage6–130.0532%4 Aug
nuke13–50.0416%4 Aug
anubis13–80.0415%3 Aug
nuke13–110.0920%3 Aug
ancient10–130.0113%3 Aug
ancient13–50.0628%3 Aug
mirage13–60.1019%2 Aug
anubis13–50.0140%2 Aug
nuke13–100.0330%2 Aug
cache13–20.0912%2 Aug
dust213–70.0424%2 Aug
dust213–10.0231%2 Aug
dust213–40.0324%31 Jul
cache9–13-0.0224%31 Jul
dust22–70.0030%31 Jul
mirage9–130.0034%31 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0425%30 Jul
anubis13–80.0317%28 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0131%28 Jul
dust28–130.0023%28 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0230%27 Jul
cache13–30.0638%27 Jul
cache3–13-0.0516%26 Jul
mirage13–80.0929%25 Jul
nuke6–130.0332%25 Jul
mirage13–40.0828%25 Jul
nuke11–130.0620%3 Jul
dust21–13-0.0328%3 Jul
dust213–50.0615%15 Jun
dust213–6-0.0419%15 Jun
dust27–13-0.0042%7 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0126%7 Jun
mirage13–80.0642%7 Jun
inferno13–70.0018%6 Jun
mirage16–130.0213%6 Jun
dust213–30.0936%27 May
inferno13–6-0.0422%27 May
inferno13–40.0127%27 May
anubis13–90.0038%21 May
mirage13–40.0839%21 May
overpass13–10.0629%21 May
inferno13–100.0623%18 May
anubis13–90.1018%18 May
ancient16–130.0115%18 May
overpass13–90.0733%17 May
mirage13–40.067%17 May
inferno13–90.0120%16 May
inferno13–70.0520%16 May
mirage13–70.0840%16 May
dust213–9-0.0530%16 May
inferno13–60.0815%16 May
overpass13–30.0838%16 May
dust210–13-0.0224%15 May
dust213–70.0619%13 May
mirage4–13-0.0624%13 May
mirage13–11-0.0412%13 May
dust23–13-0.0334%13 May
nuke8–13-0.0522%11 May
mirage3–13-0.0210%11 May
ancient5–13-0.0110%6 May
dust27–1-0.0113%6 May
inferno8–130.0036%4 May
inferno13–50.0019%4 May
overpass8–13-0.0019%4 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches21-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →