dzyist! — CS2 Stats

76561199217071484[U:1:1256805756]

893Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,611Pink band · top ~7.8% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning57

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–41–2Last 10057%Win rateLWWLWLWWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0

Aggression7.0

Utility5.9

Positioning5.7

Opening Duels2.7

Clutch1.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning5.7

Utility5.9

Mechanics8.2

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time539ms−73ms

first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms

Headshot accuracy16.1%−1.2%

first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — mirage 13–8

13–0Biggest win — dust2

6Longest win streak

6–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 74% over 19anubisWeakest map · 43% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	27	16–11	59%	0.04
dust2	B	25	13–12	52%	0.02
ancient	S	19	14–5	74%	0.02
nuke	B	11	5–6	45%	0.00
anubis	C	7	3–4	43%	0.00
inferno	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.00
cache	—	4	3–1	75%	0.05
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

49Matches

39%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

83.5ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win

29%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	14	21%	1.04	14.6
Dust2	13	46%	0.95	15.4
Ancient	10	50%	1.11	17.3
Nuke	6	50%	1.19	17.5
Inferno	5	40%	1.06	17.6
Overpass	1	0%	0.25	4.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy

42.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

44.9%Spray accuracy

86.9%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

540msReaction time

37.9%T opening success

44.1%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

7.6%Flash assists

7.94HE damage / grenade

18.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4826 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 37.8762% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	5–13	0.02	19%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.09	20%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.13	12%	24 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.09	19%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	9%	24 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.07	13%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.00	13%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	12%	20 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	14%	20 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.05	16%	19 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.05	25%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.09	21%	19 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.05	17%	19 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.03	18%	16 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.00	13%	14 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.04	10%	14 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	30%	13 Aug →
dust2	16–13	-0.04	18%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	15%	7 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.01	9%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.03	13%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–16	-0.03	10%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.05	20%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.05	14%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.04	10%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.01	22%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.01	20%	30 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.03	16%	30 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	22%	30 Jul →
nuke	4–11	-0.02	11%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.03	26%	27 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	13%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	12%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.06	16%	25 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.06	19%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	15%	23 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	19%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	8%	23 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.06	21%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.07	26%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	12%	22 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.00	9%	22 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.05	12%	22 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.07	17%	22 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	12%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	10%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	35%	19 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.00	22%	19 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	20%	19 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	17%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.05	19%	19 Jul →
ancient	16–14	0.04	24%	19 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.00	12%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.13	19%	18 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.05	16%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	15%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.02	17%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.02	21%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.10	24%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.09	30%	16 Jul →
dust2	1–8	0.02	16%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.03	16%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	10%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	22%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.03	10%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.19	18%	16 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	9%	14 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	17%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.04	23%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.00	24%	13 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.04	29%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.00	12%	13 Jul →
ancient	14–16	0.04	15%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.03	8%	13 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.09	27%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.09	9%	12 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	21%	12 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.08	13%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.04	14%	12 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.00	17%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.09	17%	11 Jul →
inferno	12–16	0.00	15%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.05	16%	11 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.06	21%	9 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	16%	9 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.06	15%	9 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.05	19%	9 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.07	17%	6 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.10	16%	6 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.06	9%	6 Jul →
dust2	16–13	-0.00	17%	6 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.03	15%	6 Jul →
dust2	8–0	0.12	23%	5 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	25%	4 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.04	12%	4 Jul →
overpass	7–13	0.07	18%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.10	21%	4 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	21%	4 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	13%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.09	16%	3 Jul →