wet bananas

wet bananas — CS2 Stats

CN76561199198455018[U:1:1238189290]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,912Tracked matches67%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating10,023Blue band · top ~54.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 10,023 → 10,023
+10Tracked matches · now 1,912
+4.6ppWin rate · 62.1% → 66.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 23 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,023 -519 26 Jul3 Sept · 7 days played
9,20010,542peak 10,54226 Jul3 Sept
10,643Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-07-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 519 below peak (10,542)
  • -348 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 4,977 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGwet bananasFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER10,023 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning34
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52435Last 10052%Win rateWLLTLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −5.1pp headshot accuracy · −124ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 678ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility5.0
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 630ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning3.4
Utility5.0
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time646ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 645ms → last ⅓ avg 646ms
Headshot accuracy25.6%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 25.7% → last ⅓ avg 25.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 29 Jul
64%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · nuke, 26 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · mirage, 27 Jul
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 14 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
411In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA53292455%-0.01
infernoD1861233%-0.01
nukeA117464%0.06
anubisB84450%-0.02
ancient42250%-0.02
dust232167%-0.03
cache21150%0.01
vertigo110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

351Matches
47%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
79.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12543%0.9515.0
Dust25841%0.9615.8
Inferno4358%0.9113.2
Nuke3850%1.0915.0
Vertigo3540%0.9214.5
Anubis3253%1.1216.4
Ancient1471%1.0915.9
Overpass40%0.488.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.7%Spray accuracy
74.7%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
630msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
27.2%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
10.24HE damage / grenade
5.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.7091% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–50.1726%17 Sept
inferno4–9-0.0533%17 Sept
inferno2–9-0.1539%16 Sept
inferno8–80.0919%15 Sept
inferno7–9-0.1218%13 Sept
mirage0–80.0030%12 Sept
mirage6–0-0.0525%12 Sept
vertigo13–30.1029%11 Sept
inferno6–9-0.0223%11 Sept
inferno0–3-0.060%4 Sept
inferno9–60.0620%31 Aug
mirage0–3-0.0240%29 Aug
mirage4–130.0424%29 Aug
nuke9–20.0922%28 Aug
inferno9–40.0725%28 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0540%22 Aug
mirage13–90.0533%22 Aug
inferno3–9-0.2620%21 Aug
inferno6–9-0.1038%19 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0031%19 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0417%16 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0415%16 Aug
mirage6–13-0.1011%16 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0021%16 Aug
mirage13–20.0338%16 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0528%16 Aug
nuke13–70.0922%15 Aug
mirage8–13-0.038%15 Aug
mirage13–80.0025%15 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0722%15 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0233%14 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0326%14 Aug
mirage13–10.0343%14 Aug
mirage13–110.0226%14 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0324%14 Aug
mirage13–5-0.094%13 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0520%13 Aug
ancient6–13-0.1218%13 Aug
mirage9–20.0244%13 Aug
nuke13–20.0313%13 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0314%13 Aug
mirage8–10.0427%13 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0418%9 Aug
mirage11–130.0626%8 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0414%7 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0525%5 Aug
anubis7–130.1129%5 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0425%5 Aug
inferno7–90.0024%4 Aug
mirage13–1-0.0914%4 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0218%4 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0020%3 Aug
mirage3–13-0.1018%2 Aug
mirage13–10.0825%2 Aug
mirage8–60.0917%2 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0818%1 Aug
inferno16–120.0512%1 Aug
inferno7–130.0119%1 Aug
mirage13–20.0613%1 Aug
dust213–100.0124%1 Aug
mirage3–10-0.0920%31 Jul
mirage11–13-0.097%31 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0222%31 Jul
mirage13–100.0931%31 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0315%31 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0231%31 Jul
nuke9–50.0219%30 Jul
nuke13–100.0616%29 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0429%29 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0120%29 Jul
inferno9–30.1925%29 Jul
ancient13–80.0413%28 Jul
dust213–11-0.0526%28 Jul
anubis8–13-0.079%27 Jul
nuke9–130.0613%27 Jul
nuke11–130.0226%27 Jul
cache14–16-0.0724%27 Jul
cache13–50.0810%27 Jul
mirage13–10.0626%27 Jul
mirage12–120.0831%27 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0618%26 Jul
inferno13–80.0638%26 Jul
nuke13–10.0464%26 Jul
nuke6–130.1532%25 Jul
nuke4–00.1030%25 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0836%25 Jul
mirage13–110.0425%25 Jul
mirage5–00.000%25 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0619%25 Jul
dust24–13-0.0428%25 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0618%25 Jul
mirage13–20.1220%25 Jul
anubis13–60.0041%25 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0427%24 Jul
ancient13–40.0644%24 Jul
anubis13–9-0.056%23 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0339%23 Jul
nuke3–80.0357%23 Jul
mirage16–12-0.0015%23 Jul
anubis13–10.0023%23 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →