名もなき者

名もなき者 — CS2 Stats

MN76561199193558209[U:1:1233292481]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

783Tracked matches19%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningPositional Player
Premier CS Rating4,504Grey band · top ~80.9% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Jul 2026 (75 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 14 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 4,504 -2,204 14 Jan6 Jul · 3 days played
4,5047,823peak 7,82314 Jan6 Jul
7,823Peak Premier in tracked matches
957Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-01-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 957
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 94 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,319 below peak (7,823)
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 496 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG名もなき者PREMIER4,504 · Grey bandPEAK ELO957csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning44
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42517Last 10042%Win rateLLLLWLTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +5.1pp headshot accuracy · −8ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Last 10

  • 361 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 629ms

Last 20

  • 3143 · 15% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility3.5
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch3.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 633ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning4.4
Utility3.5
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time635ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 652ms → last ⅓ avg 635ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–16 · anubis, 23 Jan
40%Best headshot accuracy · 2–5 · nuke, 2 Apr
406msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · inferno, 20 May
13–1Biggest win · cache, 29 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
42In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 71% over 7infernoWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC27101737%-0.01
anubisA1810856%-0.01
infernoD1651131%-0.02
ancientB126650%0.00
cacheB84450%-0.03
dust2S75271%-0.04
nuke41325%0.00
vertigo2020%-0.11
stronghold1010%-0.02
warden1010%0.05
office1010%-0.03
poseidon1010%-0.07
train1010%-0.02
overpass110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,003Matches
48%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
77.0ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage29448%1.0015.3
Ancient12354%1.0115.4
Inferno9749%1.0315.7
Anubis8252%1.0116.0
Dust27246%0.9714.2
Nuke5358%0.9914.7
Overpass2264%0.8715.1
Train1362%0.8112.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.8%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
633msReaction time
19.0%T opening success
39.0%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
6.03HE damage / grenade
4.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.7525% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.9896% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis12–16-0.0614%10 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0311%6 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0518%4 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0738%25 May
anubis13–90.0220%25 May
stronghold8–13-0.0212%25 May
warden12–120.0512%25 May
anubis13–30.016%25 May
inferno2–130.0238%20 May
inferno13–20.0214%20 May
mirage6–13-0.0622%20 May
inferno8–80.0235%20 May
mirage9–13-0.0011%20 May
mirage11–13-0.0310%20 May
mirage12–120.0510%20 May
inferno11–13-0.0010%19 May
nuke10–13-0.025%19 May
inferno4–13-0.0611%19 May
anubis8–130.015%19 May
mirage9–13-0.0413%14 May
mirage6–13-0.0110%14 May
office7–13-0.0312%14 May
inferno3–13-0.0213%12 May
nuke1–13-0.0117%11 May
ancient7–130.0226%8 May
mirage5–13-0.0919%8 May
inferno13–30.0520%8 May
poseidon8–8-0.0720%7 May
cache13–40.029%7 May
cache12–12-0.0313%7 May
cache5–13-0.0115%7 May
mirage8–13-0.0512%5 May
inferno2–13-0.0011%5 May
cache13–7-0.1019%5 May
mirage13–40.0113%5 May
dust213–7-0.0820%4 May
cache13–5-0.1316%4 May
inferno13–160.0015%4 May
ancient13–8-0.0113%2 May
anubis10–13-0.068%1 May
cache12–12-0.0018%29 Apr
cache10–13-0.0013%29 Apr
cache13–10.069%29 Apr
anubis13–110.039%29 Apr
ancient13–70.0513%29 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0318%29 Apr
vertigo4–9-0.170%27 Apr
train8–13-0.029%22 Apr
inferno3–9-0.1015%21 Apr
mirage8–130.0013%21 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0426%12 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0219%10 Apr
ancient4–13-0.048%9 Apr
dust213–11-0.0516%9 Apr
ancient13–5-0.0916%3 Apr
inferno13–80.0213%3 Apr
ancient13–70.0714%2 Apr
nuke2–50.0240%2 Apr
dust213–6-0.0523%1 Apr
anubis13–3-0.076%1 Apr
anubis5–00.010%1 Apr
mirage13–10.0927%31 Mar
mirage13–40.0616%31 Mar
ancient13–90.0117%31 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0520%31 Mar
anubis13–60.0419%30 Mar
dust213–9-0.048%22 Mar
anubis13–9-0.0221%21 Mar
anubis13–10.0116%21 Mar
dust213–9-0.0210%21 Mar
ancient10–130.014%11 Mar
inferno2–9-0.1322%10 Mar
mirage13–90.0317%27 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0415%26 Feb
vertigo10–13-0.0411%18 Feb
inferno2–9-0.190%18 Feb
inferno9–3-0.0117%18 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0623%17 Feb
anubis12–160.0021%9 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0019%9 Feb
mirage16–13-0.0111%9 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0229%7 Feb
dust25–13-0.0423%6 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0314%4 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0312%3 Feb
dust213–160.0319%3 Feb
mirage12–12-0.047%28 Jan
overpass13–4-0.0112%28 Jan
ancient6–13-0.012%27 Jan
ancient13–16-0.0116%25 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0712%24 Jan
ancient13–20.094%24 Jan
anubis13–20.029%23 Jan
anubis13–160.0910%23 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0127%21 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0321%20 Jan
inferno13–10.0918%19 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0316%15 Jan
nuke9–30.0230%15 Jan
mirage13–30.0618%14 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →