lemme check.

lemme check. — CS2 Stats

VN76561199189699015[U:1:1229433287]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,163Tracked matches60%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,379Hours in CS9Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.7 Learning
Premier CS Rating11,543Blue band · top ~46.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15633 of 21945 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlemme check.FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER11,543 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim29
Positioning55
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY35614Last 10035%Win rateWLWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim2.9
Aggression7.4
Utility4.2
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 648ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 56% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.9
Positioning5.5
Utility4.2
Mechanics1.3
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact8.3

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time655ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 655ms
Headshot accuracy15.0%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 11.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — dust2 13–11
131Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
912In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 46% over 24mirageWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B24111346%-0.01
nukeC1771041%0.00
infernoC145936%-0.01
mirageD1331023%-0.01
anubisC83538%0.01
cacheD62433%0.01
ancientD62433%-0.05
vertigo4040%-0.06
overpass31233%0.00
debris2020%-0.06
office21150%-0.00
poseidon1010%-0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

36,489Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
2,400Matches
41.2%Match win rate
41.6%Headshot %
0.6%Shot accuracy
4,443MVPs
845Hours (in match)
1,285Bombs planted
410Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,994inferno
2,757dust2
2,626nuke
1,222train
1,061vertigo
756office
59italy
23safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

7Matches
43%Win rate
0.78Avg K/D
70.1ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
38%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage250%0.7810.5
Anubis20%0.427.0
Nuke10%0.6111.0
Vertigo1100%1.0012.0
Inferno1100%1.4423.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.7%Spray accuracy
55.8%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
648msReaction time
31.1%T opening success
53.4%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
5.96HE damage / grenade
5.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4592 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.0954% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis16–130.009%20 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0513%18 Aug
nuke16–140.0412%18 Aug
debris7–9-0.0911%18 Aug
inferno6–9-0.094%18 Aug
nuke5–9-0.066%18 Aug
dust211–13-0.048%18 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0928%18 Aug
inferno13–4-0.1010%18 Aug
dust216–14-0.0116%18 Aug
poseidon2–9-0.1325%11 Aug
dust213–9-0.048%7 Aug
cache13–8-0.028%7 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0223%7 Aug
ancient13–8-0.053%7 Aug
nuke13–100.0425%7 Aug
dust210–13-0.078%5 Aug
dust211–130.0517%3 Aug
nuke13–50.0526%3 Aug
mirage13–10.058%3 Aug
vertigo11–13-0.0415%3 Aug
cache9–13-0.0319%3 Aug
dust23–13-0.0517%1 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0215%1 Aug
nuke13–80.0927%1 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0010%1 Aug
dust213–70.0328%1 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0220%1 Aug
dust213–8-0.0211%1 Aug
anubis13–30.089%1 Aug
inferno11–130.0619%1 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0115%1 Aug
inferno13–110.0425%31 Jul
cache9–130.0717%31 Jul
dust27–130.0424%31 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0413%31 Jul
anubis15–150.0412%31 Jul
dust211–130.0415%31 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0313%31 Jul
dust216–14-0.0316%31 Jul
debris8–8-0.049%30 Jul
dust211–13-0.0219%30 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0130%30 Jul
inferno11–130.0420%30 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0113%17 Jul
mirage9–13-0.018%17 Jul
inferno13–80.028%17 Jul
anubis11–130.0018%17 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0119%17 Jul
vertigo9–13-0.0113%17 Jul
inferno9–20.0831%17 Jul
inferno8–80.018%17 Jul
nuke1–13-0.009%15 Jul
nuke11–130.078%11 Jul
dust213–11-0.0416%11 Jul
ancient9–130.008%11 Jul
cache8–13-0.0711%11 Jul
dust211–13-0.0211%11 Jul
dust21–13-0.059%11 Jul
mirage15–150.0411%11 Jul
inferno13–40.028%10 Jul
dust26–13-0.0512%10 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0613%10 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0811%10 Jul
anubis13–7-0.047%10 Jul
dust28–70.0212%5 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0713%5 Jul
cache7–130.0211%5 Jul
mirage13–80.008%5 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0311%5 Jul
nuke4–130.0513%5 Jul
vertigo2–13-0.134%5 Jul
anubis7–13-0.027%5 Jul
office13–80.0612%5 Jul
mirage10–130.0210%5 Jul
nuke7–130.0419%5 Jul
inferno2–130.0420%4 Jul
office6–13-0.0617%4 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0813%4 Jul
vertigo7–13-0.058%4 Jul
inferno3–13-0.090%4 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0317%4 Jul
dust210–130.0229%4 Jul
mirage3–13-0.057%4 Jul
anubis7–130.0219%4 Jul
dust213–1-0.0315%10 Jun
cache13–90.068%10 Jun
ancient1–13-0.106%10 Jun
dust213–110.0423%10 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0518%10 Jun
dust213–110.0912%10 Jun
inferno8–13-0.085%10 Jun
dust216–14-0.0414%10 Jun
overpass14–160.0310%10 Jun
inferno10–130.0213%10 Jun
dust26–130.027%10 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0612%9 Jun
dust23–13-0.1215%9 Jun
overpass16–130.036%9 Jun
mirage13–5-0.032%9 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →