Perzivalt

Perzivalt — CS2 Stats

BR76561199172482297[U:1:1212216569]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

533Tracked matches41%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating2.1 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating12,433Blue band · top ~42% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 3 Nov 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,433 +2,333 3 Nov4 Sept · 17 days played
8,70512,596peak 12,5963 Nov4 Sept
12,719Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2025-11-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 163 below peak (12,596)
  • -163 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 2,567 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPerzivaltFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER12,433 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim19
Positioning22
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40582Last 10040%Win rateWLWWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.0pp headshot accuracy · +67ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 681ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 685ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 652ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.1 against its own average).

Aim1.9
Utility4.8
Positioning2.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 668ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 59% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim1.9
Positioning2.2
Utility4.8
Mechanics2.1
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact2.1

Composite 2.1/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.07−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.07
Reaction time674ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 705ms → last ⅓ avg 674ms
Headshot accuracy12.0%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 12.2% → last ⅓ avg 12.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.07Best match rating · 6–13 · mirage, 13 Jul
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · office, 16 Jun
422msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 7 Jul
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 27 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
43In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 50% over 20anubisWeakest map · 23% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC26101638%-0.04
ancientB20101050%-0.06
dust2B168850%-0.04
anubisD1331023%-0.06
cacheC52340%-0.07
office41325%-0.06
vertigo41325%-0.05
inferno41325%-0.05
nuke31233%-0.05
overpass32167%-0.03
shelter1010%-0.00
train110100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (23% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

162Matches
44%Win rate
0.57Avg K/D
54.8ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

18%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5046%0.589.4
Anubis4547%0.599.5
Mirage2741%0.609.7
Dust21953%0.478.5
Vertigo729%0.5811.1
Inferno540%0.458.0
Nuke540%0.7713.6
Train30%0.519.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.1%Headshot accuracy
25.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.1%Spray accuracy
59.5%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
668msReaction time
16.1%T opening success
15.8%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
6.44HE damage / grenade
10.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.0631% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 16.0629% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

23% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–10-0.0315%17 Sept
anubis1–13-0.100%17 Sept
mirage13–4-0.013%12 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0925%12 Sept
mirage13–3-0.0614%12 Sept
cache5–13-0.0920%4 Sept
mirage1–13-0.0813%3 Sept
office4–13-0.0411%3 Sept
cache7–13-0.140%3 Sept
mirage3–13-0.099%3 Sept
ancient13–5-0.059%3 Sept
dust22–13-0.0713%2 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0910%30 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0620%26 Aug
mirage2–130.0216%25 Aug
anubis9–13-0.034%23 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.058%23 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0911%23 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0911%12 Aug
ancient9–13-0.1210%12 Aug
dust213–10-0.0621%8 Aug
anubis0–13-0.100%7 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0314%7 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0710%7 Aug
ancient2–13-0.079%17 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0824%17 Jul
mirage13–7-0.096%16 Jul
anubis13–5-0.067%16 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0416%16 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0518%16 Jul
dust213–4-0.0524%16 Jul
ancient6–13-0.1110%15 Jul
dust213–8-0.0117%15 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0114%15 Jul
dust213–40.019%15 Jul
mirage5–13-0.065%15 Jul
inferno13–90.0215%15 Jul
cache13–6-0.066%15 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0417%15 Jul
ancient13–90.0112%15 Jul
dust213–3-0.0215%15 Jul
nuke13–100.0114%15 Jul
ancient13–4-0.069%13 Jul
ancient13–8-0.077%13 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0511%13 Jul
dust27–13-0.0619%13 Jul
mirage6–130.0713%13 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0314%13 Jul
office10–13-0.096%11 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0516%9 Jul
shelter5–13-0.004%9 Jul
anubis4–13-0.1017%7 Jul
nuke1–13-0.124%7 Jul
dust213–80.0312%1 Jul
anubis10–13-0.055%28 Jun
overpass13–5-0.0426%28 Jun
cache4–13-0.073%27 Jun
anubis4–13-0.045%27 Jun
office13–8-0.1036%16 Jun
mirage4–13-0.1212%16 Jun
mirage13–50.0117%13 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0623%13 Jun
ancient13–2-0.0116%13 Jun
cache4–0-0.0213%13 Jun
vertigo1–13-0.1010%11 Jun
dust24–13-0.076%11 Jun
vertigo6–130.0317%4 Jun
vertigo13–6-0.0816%4 Jun
dust213–8-0.0417%4 Jun
inferno7–13-0.099%2 Jun
mirage13–2-0.038%28 May
mirage13–00.010%27 May
mirage5–13-0.1011%26 May
ancient7–13-0.0615%26 May
mirage8–13-0.0117%9 May
ancient6–13-0.0230%8 May
office8–13-0.0219%1 Feb
ancient11–13-0.076%1 Feb
mirage4–13-0.0522%21 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0717%21 Jan
dust212–16-0.038%4 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0613%27 Nov
nuke3–13-0.0517%27 Nov
mirage13–110.0011%27 Nov
mirage13–3-0.0617%27 Nov
dust23–13-0.1010%27 Nov
dust28–13-0.049%25 Nov
mirage8–13-0.063%19 Nov
mirage8–13-0.018%19 Nov
mirage11–13-0.067%17 Nov
overpass16–14-0.058%13 Nov
mirage5–13-0.055%13 Nov
dust213–90.0123%13 Nov
dust22–13-0.0511%7 Nov
train13–1-0.057%5 Nov
ancient13–110.0013%5 Nov
dust212–12-0.0513%5 Nov
overpass7–13-0.0114%4 Nov
ancient10–13-0.0815%4 Nov
ancient3–13-0.026%3 Nov

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →