ixnut

ixnut — CS2 Stats

DO76561199088898533[U:1:1128632805]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,301Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,006 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,301 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 5 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,441 -207 17 Apr21 Apr · 2 days played
23,44123,648peak 23,64817 Apr21 Apr
Faceit ELO: 1,006 +0 31 Aug4 Sept · 2 observations
1,0061,006peak 1,00631 Aug4 Sept
23,648Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,006Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-04-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,006
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 45 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGixnutFACEITLevel 8 · 1,006 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,006csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning44
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55423Last 10055%Win rateLLWLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · +38ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 632ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility5.6
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.4
Utility5.6
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time637ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%−4.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–5 · inferno, 18 Apr
46%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 17 Apr
406msFastest reaction time · 3–9 · inferno, 6 Apr
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 23 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
811In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 43anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA43271663%0.03
dust2A1810856%-0.01
mirageB178947%-0.02
anubisD93633%-0.03
ancient42250%-0.03
nuke42250%-0.06
cache21150%0.02
overpass21150%-0.01
warden110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

520Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
81.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust213258%1.1516.0
Mirage13250%1.0316.0
Inferno5044%1.1117.2
Anubis4935%0.9014.4
Ancient2654%0.9515.3
Nuke1747%0.8313.2
Overpass1662%1.2818.4
Cache1644%0.9716.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
29.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
73.9%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
614msReaction time
30.2%T opening success
42.2%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
9.87HE damage / grenade
11.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.1783% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–13-0.047%11 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0713%6 Jul
dust216–13-0.0114%5 Jul
mirage9–130.0321%4 Jul
anubis11–130.0321%4 Jul
dust211–13-0.0715%4 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0120%28 Jun
dust213–10.1039%28 Jun
anubis20–22-0.0415%27 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0230%20 Jun
dust29–13-0.0319%17 Jun
inferno13–11-0.068%16 Jun
dust22–13-0.0710%15 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0814%13 Jun
dust213–40.1025%6 Jun
dust216–12-0.0111%5 Jun
dust216–12-0.0621%5 Jun
cache3–13-0.0136%2 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0918%31 May
mirage13–100.0522%30 May
ancient13–8-0.0314%30 May
dust24–13-0.0113%30 May
dust213–7-0.0319%30 May
dust210–13-0.0613%30 May
mirage4–13-0.083%30 May
anubis13–11-0.0122%28 May
mirage11–13-0.0916%25 May
nuke13–6-0.0711%24 May
dust213–5-0.0424%24 May
mirage13–00.0721%23 May
mirage13–10.0536%23 May
dust211–130.0328%21 May
mirage1–13-0.130%19 May
anubis13–16-0.0712%17 May
overpass10–13-0.0419%16 May
anubis11–13-0.089%16 May
nuke13–5-0.0313%16 May
anubis13–50.0611%16 May
mirage13–4-0.009%12 May
mirage13–20.0423%12 May
ancient13–4-0.0317%12 May
dust210–13-0.0114%10 May
overpass13–50.0312%4 May
cache13–100.0421%4 May
inferno13–40.0719%3 May
mirage8–130.0324%3 May
nuke9–13-0.0721%21 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0917%21 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0313%21 Apr
dust213–40.0629%19 Apr
dust28–13-0.0423%18 Apr
inferno2–9-0.009%18 Apr
inferno7–9-0.1316%18 Apr
inferno9–3-0.079%18 Apr
inferno2–9-0.1421%18 Apr
inferno3–9-0.1022%18 Apr
inferno6–9-0.119%18 Apr
inferno9–40.2020%18 Apr
inferno9–10.1527%18 Apr
inferno9–60.0419%18 Apr
inferno9–50.1234%18 Apr
inferno9–6-0.0318%18 Apr
inferno9–10.2017%18 Apr
inferno9–30.0715%18 Apr
inferno6–90.1220%18 Apr
inferno9–10.1120%18 Apr
inferno9–70.0521%18 Apr
inferno7–90.0222%18 Apr
inferno3–9-0.1040%18 Apr
inferno8–8-0.0015%18 Apr
inferno9–20.0721%18 Apr
inferno9–60.1037%18 Apr
inferno9–7-0.008%18 Apr
inferno8–80.0216%18 Apr
inferno9–4-0.046%18 Apr
inferno9–50.2423%18 Apr
inferno9–7-0.0614%18 Apr
inferno9–50.1924%18 Apr
inferno9–60.0315%18 Apr
inferno7–90.0934%18 Apr
inferno9–30.2132%18 Apr
inferno9–50.0520%18 Apr
mirage13–1-0.0525%17 Apr
anubis13–4-0.0618%17 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0419%17 Apr
dust213–11-0.0319%17 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0846%17 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0220%17 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0510%17 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0229%17 Apr
inferno3–9-0.118%6 Apr
inferno9–4-0.0118%5 Apr
warden13–10-0.0319%5 Apr
dust213–11-0.0131%5 Apr
inferno6–90.0415%5 Apr
inferno8–80.0432%5 Apr
inferno6–9-0.1018%5 Apr
inferno9–20.0932%5 Apr
inferno9–50.1526%5 Apr
inferno9–40.0831%5 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →