-fernie — CS2 Stats

76561199084986740[U:1:1124721012]✓ No bans

1,546Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,984Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.2% of ranked players (population est.)

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68

Positioning36

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateWWWWWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8

Aggression1.4

Utility4.1

Positioning3.6

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch1.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8

Positioning3.6

Utility4.1

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels0.0

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time586ms−13ms

first ⅓ avg 599ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms

Headshot accuracy20.6%+0.6%

first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — overpass 9–1

13–3Biggest win — cache

7Longest win streak

W7Current streak

6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 100% over 10dust2Weakest map · 25% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	19	7–12	37%	-0.04
cache	C	16	6–10	38%	-0.04
nuke	A	14	9–5	64%	-0.02
dust2	D	12	3–9	25%	-0.05
ancient	S	10	10–0	100%	-0.01
anubis	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.04
inferno	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.06
poseidon	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.07
vertigo	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.03
debris	—	3	3–0	100%	0.02
overpass	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.01
eldorado	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

259Matches

52%Win rate

0.83Avg K/D

74.3ADR

38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win

16%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	14	57%	0.89	14.6
Ancient	12	58%	0.85	15.1
Nuke	10	70%	0.77	12.5
Cache	7	43%	0.85	14.4
Dust2	6	33%	0.77	14.7
Anubis	5	40%	0.72	11.4
Inferno	5	80%	1.07	16.2
Train	1	100%	1.27	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.3%Headshot accuracy

31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.3%Spray accuracy

82.4%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

588msReaction time

17.7%T opening success

29.0%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

2.1%Flash assists

9.03HE damage / grenade

4.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 17.7144% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–11	-0.02	16%	27 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.00	24%	26 Aug →
eldorado	9–4	0.05	10%	24 Aug →
nuke	9–4	0.06	30%	24 Aug →
inferno	9–2	0.09	23%	24 Aug →
poseidon	9–6	-0.05	18%	24 Aug →
vertigo	9–2	0.02	13%	24 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.05	15%	22 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	18%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	15%	21 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.00	21%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	32%	18 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.02	21%	17 Aug →
inferno	6–9	-0.11	26%	13 Aug →
debris	9–4	-0.02	11%	13 Aug →
nuke	19–15	-0.04	17%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.01	6%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.02	16%	10 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.06	14%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.00	24%	10 Aug →
vertigo	3–9	-0.18	22%	10 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	23%	8 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.06	10%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	18%	6 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	23%	4 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.07	24%	2 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.03	36%	2 Aug →
dust2	12–16	0.02	22%	1 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	22%	1 Aug →
mirage	3–2	0.00	25%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.02	33%	1 Aug →
eldorado	9–5	-0.10	26%	31 Jul →
debris	9–7	0.08	23%	31 Jul →
vertigo	8–8	0.08	19%	31 Jul →
inferno	6–9	-0.13	0%	31 Jul →
poseidon	7–9	-0.08	22%	31 Jul →
nuke	6–9	-0.02	23%	31 Jul →
overpass	9–1	0.10	16%	31 Jul →
nuke	16–13	0.01	18%	31 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	12%	31 Jul →
nuke	19–15	-0.02	11%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	9%	28 Jul →
overpass	8–8	-0.05	9%	27 Jul →
poseidon	2–9	-0.14	25%	27 Jul →
debris	9–3	0.01	19%	27 Jul →
nuke	9–2	0.08	16%	27 Jul →
poseidon	9–1	0.00	27%	27 Jul →
inferno	4–9	-0.16	15%	27 Jul →
dust2	3–8	-0.10	36%	26 Jul →
mirage	5–1	-0.08	20%	26 Jul →
anubis	16–14	0.04	16%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.02	25%	25 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.03	22%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–4	-0.03	23%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	25%	24 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.06	24%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	11%	23 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.02	17%	22 Jul →
cache	0–2	-0.01	0%	22 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.10	14%	21 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	21%	21 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.08	16%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	18%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.06	23%	20 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.07	16%	20 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.05	19%	19 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.00	20%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.01	7%	16 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.04	14%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.10	10%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.10	11%	15 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.02	16%	15 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.08	11%	15 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.10	16%	14 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	25%	13 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.07	21%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	25%	13 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.01	24%	13 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.04	26%	12 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.08	18%	12 Jul →
mirage	3–6	0.04	25%	12 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.04	31%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	24%	11 Jul →
dust2	16–12	-0.03	23%	10 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	20%	10 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.03	23%	10 Jul →
ancient	16–13	-0.04	17%	10 Jul →
mirage	12–12	-0.03	16%	8 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.04	19%	8 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.02	25%	8 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	23%	2 Jul →
overpass	5–13	-0.06	18%	2 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	25%	2 Jul →
nuke	13–3	-0.00	21%	1 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.01	13%	1 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.09	16%	1 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	29%	30 Jun →
nuke	0–2	-0.11	0%	29 Jun →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	23%	29 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	47%	29 Jun →