washed 😭 — CS2 Stats

76561199079414527[U:1:1119148799]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,117Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

5,656Hours in CS29Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim91

Positioning64

Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT60–39–1Last 10060%Win rateWWWLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.1

Aggression9.8

Utility4.5

Positioning6.4

Opening Duels5.0

Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 41% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1

Positioning6.4

Utility4.5

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels5.0

Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.05

Reaction time547ms+28ms

first ⅓ avg 519ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms

Headshot accuracy30.9%+3.4%

first ⅓ avg 27.5% → last ⅓ avg 30.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — mirage 13–3

13–1Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

W3Current streak

14–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 89% over 9anubisWeakest map · 36% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	21	12–9	57%	0.05
nuke	S	16	12–4	75%	0.06
anubis	C	14	5–9	36%	0.02
ancient	B	13	7–6	54%	0.03
inferno	C	12	5–7	42%	0.03
dust2	S	10	8–2	80%	0.05
cache	S	9	8–1	89%	0.06
overpass	A	5	3–2	60%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

181,131Lifetime kills

1.27K/D · Top 25% of tracked players

6,022Matches

67.5%Match win rate · Top 5% of tracked players

56.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players

13.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players

26,164MVPs

3,306Hours (in match)

4,873Bombs planted

2,058Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4773,285

M4A4 / M4A1-S27,256

AWP24,207

Desert Eagle18,373

P2000 / USP-S10,222

Knife5,412

Glock-185,055

MP92,717

Tec-92,268

SSG 082,027

Lifetime map wins

7,134vertigo

5,818dust2

4,499inferno

3,537nuke

2,884train

47cbble

37lake

10stmarc

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,786Matches

63%Win rate

1.44Avg K/D

93.3ADR

55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

30Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	325	59%	1.32	19.2
Anubis	137	54%	1.26	17.9
Ancient	78	49%	1.16	18.0
Dust2	31	68%	1.25	17.9
Nuke	20	60%	1.58	20.4
Vertigo	18	56%	1.12	20.3
Train	10	50%	1.40	22.4
Cache	5	0%	0.91	18.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.7%Headshot accuracy

37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.8%Spray accuracy

82.9%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

546msReaction time

40.7%T opening success

59.2%CT opening success

0.51Enemies flashed / flash

8.5%Flash assists

7.61HE damage / grenade

7.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	16–12	0.07	38%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.09	33%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.02	26%	8 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.05	30%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.08	25%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.06	25%	7 Aug →
cache	16–12	0.08	36%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.03	23%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.08	28%	31 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.02	32%	31 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.03	22%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.16	30%	31 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.14	29%	31 Jul →
anubis	14–16	0.00	18%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.06	44%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.01	33%	29 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	35%	29 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.07	47%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	32%	28 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	35%	28 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.06	10%	28 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.00	45%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	29%	27 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.08	30%	27 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.00	39%	27 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.00	37%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.07	42%	26 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.00	32%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.09	15%	18 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.09	25%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.15	27%	18 Jul →
cache	19–16	-0.00	36%	17 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	32%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.04	22%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.04	27%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.06	31%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.05	40%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.03	21%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.11	27%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.01	32%	14 Jul →
ancient	2–13	0.03	37%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.17	24%	13 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.07	47%	13 Jul →
inferno	14–16	0.02	24%	13 Jul →
nuke	16–14	0.02	27%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.06	32%	12 Jul →
cache	16–12	0.07	25%	12 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.02	34%	12 Jul →
cache	4–13	0.04	37%	12 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.06	24%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.11	27%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.10	28%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.05	35%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.05	19%	12 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.03	22%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	24%	12 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.07	31%	12 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.01	27%	12 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	26%	12 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.06	13%	11 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.01	39%	11 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	21%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.00	38%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.03	21%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.04	25%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.01	26%	11 Jul →
ancient	5–13	0.07	45%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.09	23%	11 Jul →
anubis	14–16	-0.01	24%	11 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.11	25%	11 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.01	26%	11 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.00	19%	11 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.03	40%	11 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.08	33%	11 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.06	17%	10 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.06	18%	8 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	18%	8 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.05	25%	8 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.05	22%	8 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.04	26%	8 Jul →
nuke	5–5	0.10	29%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.11	33%	8 Jul →
overpass	13–8	-0.01	30%	7 Jul →
inferno	3–6	-0.06	30%	7 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.09	20%	7 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	22%	7 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.01	34%	7 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.06	29%	7 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.02	43%	7 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.08	28%	7 Jul →
overpass	13–9	-0.04	19%	7 Jul →
overpass	13–16	0.00	21%	6 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.01	29%	6 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.06	24%	6 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	28%	6 Jul →
ancient	16–13	0.05	39%	6 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.00	27%	6 Jul →
overpass	2–13	-0.09	25%	6 Jul →
overpass	22–20	0.01	27%	5 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.05	54%	5 Jul →