Ragequez

Ragequez — CS2 Stats

76561199069964308[U:1:1109698580]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

776Tracked matches75%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,532Purple band · top ~14.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Oct 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,532 -126 9 Sept – 28 Oct · 7 days played
17,37118,658peak 18,6589 Sept28 Oct
18,658Peak Premier in tracked matches
24Days played since 2026-09-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 126 below peak (18,658)
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,468 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRagequezFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,532 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning59
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT62–32–6Last 10062%Win rateWWWWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · −79ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Last 10

  • 10–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 20

  • 16–3–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.1
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch4.0

Strong T-side openerEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 61% on T to 35% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 600ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.9
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time595ms−3ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%+2.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 17 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–1 · ancient, 19 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 6–9 · inferno, 2 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 28 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
W10Current streak
3–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 83% over 6cacheWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2111–1052%0.03
infernoS1814–478%-0.01
ancientS1612–475%0.03
cacheC146–843%-0.01
nukeB105–550%0.04
overpassS65–183%0.01
dust2S54–180%0.03
boulder—31–233%0.02
train—31–233%-0.00
anubis—22–0100%0.05
fachwerk—11–0100%-0.01
vertigo—10–10%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

33Matches
58%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
91.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1070%1.2016.8
Ancient771%1.3818.1
Anubis560%1.0820.4
Mirage540%0.9816.0
Dust2333%1.3120.3
Nuke250%1.3622.0
Cache10%1.1919.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
600msReaction time
61.3%T opening success
35.1%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
3.8%Flash assists
8.93HE damage / grenade
4.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.1221% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.0317%1 Nov →
dust213–110.0813%31 Oct →
ancient13–00.0826%28 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0517%28 Oct →
ancient13–20.0117%28 Oct →
inferno13–90.0517%27 Oct →
anubis13–40.0710%27 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0014%27 Oct →
mirage13–110.0820%26 Oct →
ancient13–100.0327%26 Oct →
boulder12–12-0.0421%26 Oct →
overpass13–8-0.0314%26 Oct →
mirage6–130.0420%26 Oct →
mirage13–50.0717%26 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0015%26 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0120%25 Oct →
boulder6–130.0216%25 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0318%25 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0629%25 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0029%25 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0323%25 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0219%24 Oct →
inferno13–1-0.039%23 Oct →
inferno13–50.0220%23 Oct →
cache12–12-0.0019%23 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0012%23 Oct →
mirage13–60.0922%23 Oct →
nuke11–130.0619%22 Oct →
nuke6–00.1117%22 Oct →
mirage5–130.0714%22 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0016%22 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0410%22 Oct →
ancient11–60.0316%22 Oct →
cache13–100.0320%22 Oct →
overpass7–20.0530%22 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0217%21 Oct →
cache11–130.0433%21 Oct →
mirage11–130.037%19 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0413%19 Oct →
nuke13–80.0420%19 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0211%19 Oct →
cache12–160.0121%19 Oct →
ancient4–10.0150%19 Oct →
mirage13–100.1518%18 Oct →
nuke13–10.0532%18 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0113%18 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0414%17 Oct →
overpass4–13-0.0218%17 Oct →
nuke1–80.0033%17 Oct →
overpass13–10.0542%17 Oct →
ancient13–50.1923%17 Oct →
overpass13–6-0.0125%16 Oct →
nuke4–00.136%16 Oct →
fachwerk13–10-0.0111%14 Oct →
ancient13–50.0210%14 Oct →
boulder13–10.0710%14 Oct →
mirage10–130.0111%14 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0612%14 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0313%14 Oct →
inferno12–12-0.0316%8 Oct →
ancient13–40.1112%8 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0319%8 Oct →
mirage10–30.1023%8 Oct →
mirage13–50.0910%8 Oct →
train8–130.0120%8 Oct →
mirage12–120.0619%7 Oct →
nuke12–120.1016%7 Oct →
ancient13–60.0423%7 Oct →
ancient9–00.0927%7 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0313%5 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0129%5 Oct →
ancient13–90.0115%5 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0221%5 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0224%5 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0626%5 Oct →
train13–50.0426%5 Oct →
cache9–130.0024%4 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.047%4 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0018%4 Oct →
cache6–13-0.059%3 Oct →
ancient9–130.0113%3 Oct →
cache13–70.0017%3 Oct →
dust211–130.0114%3 Oct →
inferno9–40.0616%3 Oct →
dust213–20.0718%3 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0427%2 Oct →
inferno7–90.018%2 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.0513%2 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.058%1 Oct →
cache13–80.0213%1 Oct →
dust213–80.0120%1 Oct →
train8–13-0.056%1 Oct →
ancient11–130.003%30 Sept →
anubis13–30.0315%30 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0212%30 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.079%29 Sept →
vertigo10–130.0119%29 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0311%29 Sept →
overpass13–50.056%29 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.069%29 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.