Purve

Purve — CS2 Stats

76561199048788918[U:1:1088523190]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

525Tracked matches48%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating26,061Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11460 of 220311 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 34 days played since 16 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,061 +5,685 16 Jun13 Sept · 28 days played
20,37626,294peak 26,29416 Jun13 Sept
26,294Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,535Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-06-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,535
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 216 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • 233 below peak (26,294)
  • +1,676 over 30 days · improving
  • +5,685 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 3,939 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPurvePREMIER26,061 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,535csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning49
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51472Last 10051%Win rateLLWWWLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.1pp headshot accuracy · +12ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 547ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.7
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning4.9
Utility4.7
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time529ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 582ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 3 Aug
43%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · inferno, 25 Aug
359msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · dust2, 18 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 30 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
63In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 10dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2691735%-0.00
ancientA2213959%0.01
anubisA1811761%0.02
infernoB137654%0.01
nukeS108280%0.04
dust2D82625%-0.01
cache31233%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

396Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
81.8ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10151%0.9916.0
Ancient6751%1.0416.2
Inferno5648%1.0916.6
Nuke4959%1.1817.1
Anubis4745%1.0015.2
Dust24048%1.0917.1
Overpass475%1.3624.8
Train250%1.3118.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
85.9%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
527msReaction time
41.0%T opening success
43.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
12.4%Flash assists
9.05HE damage / grenade
4.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno10–130.0219%13 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0325%13 Sept
ancient13–60.1424%11 Sept
nuke13–50.0719%9 Sept
anubis13–50.0621%9 Sept
ancient8–13-0.095%9 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0416%9 Sept
anubis13–40.0018%9 Sept
ancient13–30.1125%9 Sept
anubis13–60.0318%9 Sept
ancient1–13-0.0224%8 Sept
dust210–13-0.0231%8 Sept
cache15–150.0219%8 Sept
nuke13–60.0817%7 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0313%7 Sept
mirage13–60.0414%7 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0518%1 Sept
dust21–13-0.0617%30 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0419%30 Aug
ancient13–90.0019%27 Aug
anubis14–160.0114%27 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0120%27 Aug
anubis11–130.0416%25 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0143%25 Aug
nuke13–40.0429%25 Aug
ancient13–6-0.079%25 Aug
mirage13–100.0522%25 Aug
dust28–13-0.0415%23 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0121%19 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0332%19 Aug
inferno13–80.0427%19 Aug
nuke13–100.0530%19 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0020%19 Aug
nuke13–40.0410%19 Aug
dust27–13-0.0531%18 Aug
mirage9–13-0.1015%18 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0328%18 Aug
anubis0–13-0.0318%17 Aug
nuke13–110.0526%17 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0728%17 Aug
anubis13–20.0921%17 Aug
ancient13–70.0414%17 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0425%17 Aug
mirage13–30.1016%16 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0423%12 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0117%12 Aug
ancient13–20.1628%12 Aug
anubis8–00.0929%12 Aug
cache6–130.0521%12 Aug
nuke13–100.0029%5 Aug
inferno13–90.0429%5 Aug
ancient13–30.1226%5 Aug
mirage10–130.0521%5 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0724%4 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0121%4 Aug
nuke13–30.0816%4 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0320%3 Aug
inferno13–30.1739%3 Aug
anubis13–100.0420%3 Aug
mirage12–160.0721%3 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0216%3 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0215%3 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0227%31 Jul
anubis13–80.0628%31 Jul
anubis13–90.0723%31 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0022%31 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0522%31 Jul
inferno13–100.0126%31 Jul
dust213–11-0.0125%31 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0118%30 Jul
ancient13–0-0.0130%30 Jul
dust213–80.0524%30 Jul
mirage13–100.0524%30 Jul
dust210–13-0.0014%30 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0630%30 Jul
anubis6–13-0.1115%29 Jul
ancient13–60.0417%26 Jul
ancient13–70.0129%23 Jul
ancient3–130.0132%21 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0722%17 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0221%17 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0013%17 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0017%16 Jul
mirage13–60.1319%16 Jul
mirage13–90.0617%16 Jul
dust29–130.0624%16 Jul
mirage1–13-0.1325%13 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0136%13 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0420%11 Jul
cache13–11-0.0220%11 Jul
inferno16–130.0127%11 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0628%10 Jul
anubis16–130.0015%10 Jul
ancient10–130.0919%2 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0731%30 Jun
nuke15–150.0524%23 Jun
mirage13–40.0518%18 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0113%16 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0116%16 Jun
mirage7–130.0433%16 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →