odhiver

odhiver — CS2 Stats

DO76561199043084063[U:1:1082818335]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

984Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidAll-Rounder
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 984 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 15 Aug 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,999 +114 15 Aug9 Dec · 12 days played
19,88522,339peak 22,33915 Aug9 Dec
Faceit ELO: 1,112 +0 1 Sept17 Sept · 4 observations
1,1121,112peak 1,1121 Sept17 Sept
22,339Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,112Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2025-08-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,112
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 89 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGodhiverPEAK ELO1,112csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning49
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54406Last 10054%Win rateLLLWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −4.7pp headshot accuracy · +36ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 711ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 673ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 655ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.3
Utility4.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 660ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.9
Utility4.9
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time652ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 717ms → last ⅓ avg 652ms
Headshot accuracy29.5%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 26.6% → last ⅓ avg 29.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–6 · inferno, 26 Sept
52%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · nuke, 22 Aug
484msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · nuke, 16 Jun
13–3Biggest win · cache, 15 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24131154%0.01
dust2A24141058%0.02
nukeC146843%0.01
infernoB147750%0.03
ancientS75271%0.03
overpassS54180%-0.01
anubis41325%-0.02
train42250%-0.01
vertigo31233%0.02
cache110100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

319Matches
47%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
92.9ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4650%1.2919.7
Dust22646%1.1018.2
Ancient1839%1.2119.7
Inferno1450%1.0418.2
Overpass425%0.8312.8
Nuke425%1.2019.0
Cache1100%1.6436.0
Train10%1.1121.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.5%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.9%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
660msReaction time
26.3%T opening success
51.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
10.59HE damage / grenade
7.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.2981% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–13-0.0533%18 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0225%11 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0223%18 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0621%18 Jun
dust213–16-0.0619%18 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0435%16 Jun
inferno13–80.1227%15 Jun
dust213–50.0513%15 Jun
cache13–3-0.0020%15 Jun
dust213–90.0136%2 Apr
mirage11–130.0328%2 Apr
anubis12–120.0532%2 Apr
vertigo5–9-0.0221%9 Dec
overpass13–11-0.1024%9 Dec
dust213–50.0434%9 Dec
dust28–2-0.0136%23 Oct
vertigo8–13-0.0524%23 Oct
dust213–50.0733%23 Oct
vertigo13–80.1436%22 Oct
mirage13–40.0531%20 Oct
nuke13–40.0346%18 Oct
nuke13–30.0447%18 Oct
dust213–100.0227%18 Oct
mirage6–130.0031%9 Oct
inferno9–60.1738%26 Sept
inferno11–130.0522%24 Sept
nuke9–7-0.0729%24 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0441%20 Sept
mirage7–130.0019%19 Sept
ancient16–120.0138%14 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0116%14 Sept
dust29–13-0.0023%14 Sept
inferno1–13-0.1044%14 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0124%14 Sept
train9–13-0.0023%14 Sept
nuke13–70.0634%13 Sept
dust28–130.1327%13 Sept
dust210–13-0.0132%13 Sept
inferno8–80.0529%13 Sept
mirage13–110.0132%11 Sept
dust26–130.0433%11 Sept
mirage13–30.0250%11 Sept
mirage13–60.0739%8 Sept
inferno8–80.1540%8 Sept
nuke9–50.1439%8 Sept
ancient13–40.1322%6 Sept
overpass13–50.0226%3 Sept
mirage13–3-0.0021%3 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0420%31 Aug
mirage13–10-0.018%29 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0130%29 Aug
nuke9–130.0146%29 Aug
nuke4–9-0.0230%29 Aug
overpass5–13-0.0726%29 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0726%29 Aug
dust26–13-0.0347%27 Aug
train13–3-0.0026%24 Aug
train13–9-0.0137%23 Aug
train11–13-0.0138%23 Aug
dust213–50.0836%23 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0318%23 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0438%22 Aug
inferno13–100.0130%22 Aug
nuke12–120.0452%22 Aug
mirage13–30.0731%22 Aug
overpass13–6-0.0250%22 Aug
mirage13–40.0224%22 Aug
dust213–10-0.0517%22 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0319%21 Aug
dust210–13-0.0225%21 Aug
dust213–7-0.0117%21 Aug
mirage9–130.0122%21 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0416%21 Aug
dust219–150.0626%20 Aug
mirage7–130.0738%20 Aug
mirage13–80.0117%20 Aug
mirage13–100.0528%20 Aug
dust211–130.0733%20 Aug
dust213–80.0121%20 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0525%20 Aug
anubis12–12-0.0343%20 Aug
overpass13–50.0934%20 Aug
dust22–130.0450%20 Aug
inferno12–120.0728%19 Aug
dust213–7-0.0317%19 Aug
dust213–70.0121%19 Aug
inferno16–130.0319%19 Aug
nuke2–130.0127%19 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0619%19 Aug
dust23–130.0338%19 Aug
ancient13–60.0125%19 Aug
nuke10–130.0329%19 Aug
dust213–40.0628%19 Aug
ancient4–130.0323%18 Aug
inferno13–90.0233%18 Aug
mirage6–130.0121%15 Aug
ancient16–12-0.0124%15 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0226%15 Aug
ancient13–80.0639%15 Aug
mirage17–190.0233%15 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →