Xin

Xin — CS2 Stats

76561199030779721[U:1:1070513993]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

615Tracked matches54%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating20,841Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#62800 of 221425 tracked
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−115Premier CS Rating · 20,956 → 20,841
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 8 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,841 +1,046 20 Aug17 Sept · 21 days played
19,79121,240peak 21,24020 Aug17 Sept
21,294Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2026-07-08

Premier CS Rating

  • 399 below peak (21,240)
  • +1,046 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,159 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGXinPREMIER20,841 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning58
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44479Last 10044%Win rateWTLLLTWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +8.5pp headshot accuracy · +4ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 10

  • 442 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 563ms

Last 20

  • 1082 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim5.6
Utility4.4
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning5.8
Utility4.4
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time541ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%−3.3%
first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 26 Aug
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · mirage, 22 Aug
391msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · anubis, 20 Aug
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 23 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
711In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 86% over 7mirageWeakest map · 30% over 53
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD53163730%0.02
ancientB137654%-0.00
nukeS1310377%0.05
anubisS76186%0.00
dust2C52340%0.05
inferno31233%0.02
train21150%0.08
vertigo2020%0.07
cache110100%-0.00
office1010%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 53). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
28.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.3%Spray accuracy
69.8%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
540msReaction time
36.6%T opening success
59.3%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
8.81HE damage / grenade
8.98Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.6071% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 53 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0037%17 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0126%17 Sept
mirage10–130.0627%17 Sept
mirage9–130.0022%17 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0437%15 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0026%15 Sept
ancient13–90.0414%14 Sept
mirage5–130.0330%14 Sept
nuke13–70.0528%13 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0427%12 Sept
cache13–11-0.0019%12 Sept
dust24–13-0.0413%12 Sept
ancient9–130.0114%11 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0033%10 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0013%8 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0820%7 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0317%7 Sept
anubis13–60.0513%6 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0128%6 Sept
nuke13–40.0021%5 Sept
mirage9–13-0.054%5 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0313%5 Sept
ancient13–90.0111%5 Sept
ancient13–11-0.009%5 Sept
ancient13–70.0310%3 Sept
mirage13–160.0224%3 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0223%1 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0213%1 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0520%30 Aug
anubis13–40.1020%30 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0117%30 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0516%29 Aug
dust211–13-0.0016%29 Aug
mirage13–90.0142%29 Aug
office10–130.0719%28 Aug
mirage12–120.1326%28 Aug
mirage6–130.0411%27 Aug
nuke13–30.2341%26 Aug
mirage13–70.1032%26 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0817%25 Aug
mirage13–70.0130%25 Aug
mirage5–130.0035%24 Aug
nuke13–10.1229%23 Aug
nuke13–40.007%23 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0114%22 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0220%22 Aug
mirage13–90.0944%22 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0630%21 Aug
dust213–20.2019%21 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0019%20 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0324%20 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0117%20 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0118%19 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0013%19 Aug
mirage13–80.1825%18 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0424%18 Aug
mirage7–130.0223%18 Aug
nuke13–80.0029%17 Aug
nuke13–60.0536%17 Aug
mirage13–80.0421%15 Aug
mirage8–13-0.018%15 Aug
ancient13–80.0123%15 Aug
mirage11–130.0726%14 Aug
nuke13–90.0811%13 Aug
mirage12–120.0420%13 Aug
train13–30.1121%13 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0314%13 Aug
mirage13–110.0423%13 Aug
train8–130.0522%12 Aug
mirage12–120.0316%12 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0119%12 Aug
mirage13–80.0129%12 Aug
mirage13–80.0632%11 Aug
mirage11–130.0123%10 Aug
dust213–110.0923%9 Aug
mirage13–60.1232%9 Aug
mirage0–3-0.0620%8 Aug
mirage13–100.0220%6 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0526%6 Aug
vertigo5–130.0131%6 Aug
nuke8–130.0223%5 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0020%4 Aug
nuke12–120.1426%2 Aug
inferno5–130.1015%31 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0213%29 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0118%28 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0229%28 Jul
mirage10–20.0820%28 Jul
mirage3–50.0825%23 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0325%23 Jul
dust26–13-0.0218%17 Jul
mirage9–130.0126%15 Jul
ancient8–130.0730%15 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0124%14 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0217%14 Jul
mirage11–130.0633%12 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0418%11 Jul
ancient13–50.0237%11 Jul
vertigo10–130.1326%8 Jul
mirage12–120.0211%8 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →