$LEEPWLK — CS2 Stats
76561199014614402[U:1:1054348674]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans
What changed since last observed
CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.
CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 3 days observed since 28 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.
Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →
Rating over time
Faceit ELO
- At peak — 1,742
- Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 9 to go
- Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
- Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
- Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
Premier CS Rating
- 444 below peak (27,026)
- Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,418 to go
- Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
- Red band first seen 2026-08-28
- Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Player DNA
Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.
Your pro match
Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity
Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.
Where you differ: lower aim profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ancient | 26 | 58% | 1.00 | 14.1 |
| Anubis | 19 | 32% | 0.88 | 13.5 |
| Mirage | 14 | 43% | 0.89 | 14.6 |
| Dust2 | 13 | 54% | 0.98 | 15.8 |
| Cache | 8 | 75% | 0.92 | 15.8 |
| Inferno | 5 | 20% | 0.94 | 12.8 |
| Vertigo | 4 | 25% | 0.74 | 12.5 |
| Overpass | 1 | 100% | 0.95 | 18.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.