T0x1c — CS2 Stats

CX76561198991361596[U:1:1031095868]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

584Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning37

Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–47–10Last 10043%Win rateWLWLLWWTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5

Aggression4.7

Utility4.4

Positioning3.7

Opening Duels0.7

Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning3.7

Utility4.4

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels1.1

Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time606ms+8ms

first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms

Headshot accuracy20.0%+4.6%

first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.07Best rating — overpass 11–13

13–1Biggest win — vertigo

6Longest win streak

7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 63% over 8cacheWeakest map · 31% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	18	7–11	39%	-0.02
cache	D	16	5–11	31%	-0.01
dust2	C	15	6–9	40%	-0.03
vertigo	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.01
anubis	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.01
inferno	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.02
overpass	A	8	5–3	63%	0.01
office	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.01
train	—	3	1–2	33%	0.00
ancient	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.02
nuke	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01
warden	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

7Matches

86%Win rate

1.80Avg K/D

72.8ADR

55%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

100%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	3	100%	2.58	19.7
Vertigo	2	100%	1.57	18.5
Nuke	1	0%	0.75	12.0
Inferno	1	100%	1.00	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy

35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.8%Spray accuracy

78.8%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

602msReaction time

26.6%T opening success

38.8%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

2.3%Flash assists

6.61HE damage / grenade

8.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4793 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.6173% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–4	-0.05	48%	26 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.08	13%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	20%	25 Aug →
vertigo	1–13	0.04	26%	10 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.03	25%	10 Aug →
vertigo	13–3	-0.06	25%	30 Jul →
vertigo	13–1	0.06	7%	30 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	-0.01	19%	29 Jul →
vertigo	6–13	-0.04	20%	29 Jul →
vertigo	5–13	-0.02	13%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	26%	28 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.04	24%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	24%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.03	11%	27 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.00	13%	27 Jul →
anubis	2–13	-0.02	37%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.05	28%	27 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.00	22%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.01	20%	25 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.02	28%	25 Jul →
anubis	15–15	0.04	20%	23 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	16%	23 Jul →
overpass	13–10	0.03	19%	1 Jun →
anubis	13–10	-0.06	14%	30 May →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	16%	30 May →
cache	8–13	-0.02	18%	29 May →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	29%	29 May →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	20%	29 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	13%	26 May →
mirage	13–4	-0.08	12%	26 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	6%	25 May →
ancient	13–7	-0.05	13%	25 May →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	18%	23 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.09	23%	23 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	15%	22 May →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	15%	22 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	15%	20 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	18%	20 May →
inferno	16–14	-0.05	21%	19 May →
overpass	12–12	-0.03	15%	19 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	12%	19 May →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	12%	18 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	18%	18 May →
dust2	10–13	-0.09	28%	18 May →
office	13–10	0.05	25%	15 May →
office	13–9	-0.03	14%	15 May →
mirage	12–12	-0.06	14%	13 May →
cache	10–13	0.02	16%	13 May →
office	11–13	-0.03	24%	13 May →
office	3–13	-0.05	33%	13 May →
cache	7–13	-0.03	22%	12 May →
ancient	10–13	0.02	10%	12 May →
train	9–13	0.02	30%	12 May →
vertigo	13–8	0.01	13%	9 May →
cache	13–5	0.05	29%	9 May →
cache	13–9	0.05	20%	6 May →
cache	5–13	-0.04	43%	6 May →
dust2	12–12	-0.02	12%	2 May →
anubis	13–6	-0.04	11%	2 May →
cache	12–12	0.00	30%	1 May →
cache	13–4	-0.03	27%	1 May →
cache	7–13	-0.06	15%	1 May →
cache	10–13	-0.01	10%	29 Apr →
cache	13–7	0.02	43%	29 Apr →
overpass	1–13	-0.05	25%	28 Apr →
vertigo	9–13	-0.03	18%	28 Apr →
train	13–6	0.06	28%	28 Apr →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	17%	27 Apr →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	19%	27 Apr →
mirage	12–12	0.05	28%	24 Apr →
train	11–13	-0.08	17%	24 Apr →
warden	13–7	-0.04	23%	8 Apr →
vertigo	12–12	-0.06	13%	8 Apr →
vertigo	13–2	0.03	13%	8 Apr →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	14%	29 Mar →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	17%	29 Mar →
office	5–13	-0.08	21%	25 Mar →
office	12–12	0.06	17%	18 Mar →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	3%	17 Mar →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	13%	17 Mar →
anubis	13–10	0.01	12%	16 Mar →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	16%	16 Mar →
dust2	12–16	-0.03	15%	16 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.04	18%	14 Mar →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	23%	14 Mar →
dust2	13–7	-0.05	16%	14 Mar →
mirage	13–9	0.01	16%	14 Mar →
inferno	13–10	-0.04	12%	14 Mar →
overpass	13–8	-0.01	26%	11 Mar →
overpass	11–13	0.07	18%	11 Mar →
overpass	13–7	0.00	14%	11 Mar →
overpass	13–5	-0.03	11%	11 Mar →
anubis	10–13	-0.00	12%	8 Mar →
overpass	13–9	0.05	19%	8 Mar →
dust2	13–11	0.00	15%	8 Mar →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	13%	6 Mar →
inferno	15–15	-0.03	18%	5 Mar →
inferno	13–7	0.05	8%	5 Mar →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	11%	3 Mar →
mirage	10–13	0.00	5%	3 Mar →