jamppi

jamppi — CS2 Stats

CX76561198980073442[U:1:1019807714]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,358Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating21,492Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#61069 of 251271 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,624 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Apr 2026 (193 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,492 +3,467 13 Jan – 2 Apr · 27 days played
17,92024,060peak 24,06013 Jan2 Apr
24,060Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,624Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-01-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,624
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 127 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,568 below peak (24,060)
  • -577 over 30 days · declining
  • +3,467 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,508 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjamppiFACEITLevel 7 · 1,624 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,492 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,624csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning49
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateLLWLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · −55ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 651ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 678ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.5
Utility5.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch5.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 659ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.9
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time652ms+48ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 652ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 10 Mar →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 4–11 · ancient, 25 Jan →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · nuke, 20 Feb →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 18 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
12–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9overpassWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3014–1647%0.03
infernoB2111–1052%0.01
nukeA138–562%0.03
dust2A95–456%-0.02
ancientA95–456%0.02
anubisS96–367%-0.00
overpassD91–811%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

414Matches
52%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
81.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1258%1.0415.2
Anubis450%1.0317.5
Nuke3100%1.4416.0
Dust230%0.7612.3
Inferno333%1.2317.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.8%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.5%Spray accuracy
81.0%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
659msReaction time
32.5%T opening success
41.8%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
10.84HE damage / grenade
9.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.4932% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust25–130.0123%2 Apr →
mirage13–160.0121%2 Apr →
inferno13–80.0117%31 Mar →
mirage2–130.0424%21 Mar →
ancient13–60.0426%21 Mar →
mirage2–13-0.1124%15 Mar →
inferno13–50.1318%10 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0822%7 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0524%6 Mar →
nuke13–80.0213%6 Mar →
inferno11–130.0128%6 Mar →
anubis6–130.0824%6 Mar →
ancient13–11-0.0122%6 Mar →
mirage10–13-0.0328%3 Mar →
mirage13–90.1223%3 Mar →
mirage2–130.0419%3 Mar →
anubis13–70.0722%3 Mar →
mirage11–130.0124%28 Feb →
nuke9–130.0116%28 Feb →
mirage2–130.0721%28 Feb →
inferno2–13-0.0313%28 Feb →
overpass8–130.0522%28 Feb →
overpass13–160.0625%28 Feb →
dust26–13-0.0627%27 Feb →
inferno5–13-0.1133%26 Feb →
ancient13–40.0526%24 Feb →
dust20–13-0.0910%24 Feb →
dust213–11-0.0218%24 Feb →
anubis5–13-0.0318%22 Feb →
inferno0–13-0.1214%22 Feb →
overpass2–13-0.0434%22 Feb →
anubis16–130.0022%22 Feb →
inferno13–70.0827%22 Feb →
mirage16–130.0425%22 Feb →
mirage7–130.0120%21 Feb →
mirage5–130.0737%21 Feb →
overpass6–130.0431%21 Feb →
inferno6–13-0.0218%20 Feb →
nuke13–9-0.0215%20 Feb →
anubis11–130.0426%20 Feb →
inferno13–60.0320%19 Feb →
mirage13–70.0322%19 Feb →
nuke13–50.0820%19 Feb →
dust213–11-0.0119%18 Feb →
nuke13–10-0.0510%18 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0116%18 Feb →
mirage13–20.0914%18 Feb →
ancient8–130.0017%18 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0233%18 Feb →
anubis13–11-0.0528%17 Feb →
anubis13–3-0.0720%16 Feb →
inferno13–60.0224%16 Feb →
ancient4–90.0629%15 Feb →
mirage13–40.0618%15 Feb →
mirage13–80.1317%15 Feb →
nuke3–13-0.0418%15 Feb →
mirage10–130.0118%15 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0720%15 Feb →
nuke13–20.1226%15 Feb →
overpass13–40.0128%15 Feb →
anubis16–14-0.0312%14 Feb →
mirage13–110.0113%13 Feb →
nuke2–130.019%13 Feb →
inferno13–100.0425%13 Feb →
overpass5–13-0.0133%13 Feb →
overpass15–15-0.0115%12 Feb →
mirage16–120.0517%12 Feb →
overpass12–16-0.0623%12 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0028%12 Feb →
anubis13–11-0.0224%12 Feb →
inferno13–70.0124%12 Feb →
mirage13–110.0223%10 Feb →
nuke13–80.0822%10 Feb →
ancient13–90.0522%8 Feb →
ancient13–30.0436%8 Feb →
mirage6–130.0519%8 Feb →
nuke13–80.0724%8 Feb →
mirage13–80.0422%8 Feb →
ancient7–130.0118%8 Feb →
inferno6–130.0012%8 Feb →
nuke9–130.0018%8 Feb →
inferno13–110.0624%8 Feb →
mirage15–150.0213%30 Jan →
dust213–110.0629%29 Jan →
mirage13–100.0823%27 Jan →
ancient4–11-0.0650%25 Jan →
inferno13–80.0822%25 Jan →
mirage16–130.0425%25 Jan →
dust28–13-0.0122%24 Jan →
nuke11–130.0214%22 Jan →
inferno16–140.0729%22 Jan →
nuke13–90.0822%22 Jan →
inferno13–16-0.0317%22 Jan →
mirage13–9-0.0123%22 Jan →
overpass11–130.0318%22 Jan →
mirage7–130.0421%22 Jan →
inferno9–130.0622%21 Jan →
mirage13–90.0721%21 Jan →
inferno2–13-0.0419%18 Jan →
inferno13–9-0.0029%13 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.