hyujin

hyujin — CS2 Stats

CZ76561198978650068[U:1:1018384340]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

539Tracked matches67%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating10,082Blue band · top ~54.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 May 2026 (136 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,082 +2,916 17 Feb – 25 May · 12 days played
7,16612,108peak 12,10817 Feb25 May
12,420Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-02-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,026 below peak (12,108)
  • +995 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 4,918 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGhyujinFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER10,082 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning43
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT60–32–8Last 10060%Win rateWTWWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · −55ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 621ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 20

  • 13–5–2 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 629ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility4.0
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 633ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.3
Utility4.0
Mechanics4.6
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time643ms+38ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 643ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−1.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 12–12 · nuke, 15 Feb →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · inferno, 18 Feb →
422msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 23 Feb →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 24 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 77% over 26ancientWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2620–677%0.02
mirageA2113–862%0.01
infernoB147–750%0.01
nukeB126–650%0.03
ancientC83–538%-0.01
officeS64–267%0.03
cache—42–250%0.01
anubis—32–167%0.03
train—32–167%-0.02
overpass—20–20%-0.07
vertigo—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
38%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
88.4ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage520%0.9214.2
Vertigo1100%0.8214.0
Nuke1100%1.0020.0
Anubis10%1.3324.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
70.9%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
633msReaction time
19.5%T opening success
42.8%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
4.38HE damage / grenade
6.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.5181% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–60.0210%27 May →
mirage12–120.1031%27 May →
inferno13–11-0.0113%27 May →
anubis13–30.0918%27 May →
dust26–13-0.1123%25 May →
ancient13–100.0019%25 May →
dust213–7-0.0316%25 May →
office13–110.0619%24 May →
train4–13-0.1133%22 May →
nuke13–10.0224%22 May →
mirage6–13-0.0422%20 May →
cache12–120.009%20 May →
nuke11–13-0.0617%19 May →
office13–11-0.0419%19 May →
cache1–13-0.0817%29 Apr →
cache13–80.0924%29 Apr →
inferno13–60.0617%20 Mar →
dust213–10.049%20 Mar →
dust213–100.0920%19 Mar →
office13–20.0420%19 Mar →
overpass2–11-0.0826%18 Mar →
office13–7-0.0117%18 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0927%17 Mar →
mirage13–60.0119%17 Mar →
nuke9–13-0.0714%17 Mar →
inferno2–13-0.075%17 Mar →
anubis10–13-0.0518%16 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0223%16 Mar →
mirage12–12-0.0117%16 Mar →
dust213–100.0128%16 Mar →
mirage13–6-0.0319%7 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.0320%5 Mar →
dust210–130.0915%5 Mar →
dust213–30.0015%3 Mar →
dust213–90.0515%3 Mar →
nuke13–40.0214%3 Mar →
overpass15–15-0.0713%3 Mar →
dust28–130.0213%1 Mar →
mirage13–110.0821%28 Feb →
mirage13–90.0316%28 Feb →
dust213–10.0318%28 Feb →
nuke13–6-0.0415%28 Feb →
dust213–60.0821%28 Feb →
inferno13–5-0.0014%27 Feb →
mirage5–130.0219%27 Feb →
dust28–13-0.0019%27 Feb →
mirage12–12-0.0611%27 Feb →
dust213–40.0129%26 Feb →
train13–50.0421%26 Feb →
inferno13–110.0211%26 Feb →
mirage13–70.0417%26 Feb →
nuke13–30.1118%26 Feb →
dust213–9-0.0017%25 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.1121%25 Feb →
train13–70.0214%25 Feb →
dust213–40.0419%25 Feb →
dust213–40.0217%25 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0110%25 Feb →
mirage16–14-0.0016%24 Feb →
inferno5–13-0.0324%24 Feb →
dust213–30.1030%24 Feb →
nuke16–130.0517%24 Feb →
mirage13–00.0819%24 Feb →
ancient6–13-0.0317%24 Feb →
inferno6–13-0.0725%23 Feb →
inferno13–50.1127%23 Feb →
dust22–13-0.100%23 Feb →
mirage13–20.0723%23 Feb →
nuke2–13-0.0032%23 Feb →
nuke4–130.0628%23 Feb →
inferno11–13-0.0419%23 Feb →
dust213–100.0827%21 Feb →
anubis13–100.0410%18 Feb →
inferno13–70.0338%18 Feb →
nuke11–13-0.0126%18 Feb →
ancient13–40.0513%18 Feb →
dust213–6-0.0215%18 Feb →
mirage13–6-0.088%18 Feb →
mirage13–60.0321%17 Feb →
mirage13–90.0318%17 Feb →
ancient7–13-0.0224%17 Feb →
office12–120.0726%17 Feb →
inferno11–130.0226%17 Feb →
mirage13–2-0.0120%17 Feb →
dust213–4-0.0319%17 Feb →
mirage10–130.0211%17 Feb →
nuke9–10.1013%17 Feb →
vertigo9–40.0225%16 Feb →
inferno9–50.0112%16 Feb →
dust29–130.0421%16 Feb →
ancient4–130.0024%16 Feb →
inferno9–130.0923%16 Feb →
office12–120.0321%16 Feb →
mirage13–70.0218%16 Feb →
dust213–90.0220%15 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0613%15 Feb →
nuke12–120.1223%15 Feb →
inferno8–130.0111%15 Feb →
ancient13–110.0310%15 Feb →
dust213–100.0533%13 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.