McLaren

McLaren — CS2 Stats

76561198944789093[U:1:984523365]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

438Tracked matches46%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating7,653Light Blue band · top ~66.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3 · 859 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 22 days played since 6 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 7,653 +2,048 8 Aug18 Sept · 19 days played
5,6059,999peak 9,9998 Aug18 Sept
9,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
859Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-08-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 859
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 42 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,346 below peak (9,999)
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 2,347 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMcLarenFACEITLevel 3 · 859 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER7,653 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO859csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51
Positioning39
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52444Last 10052%Win rateWWLWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −4.5pp headshot accuracy · +42ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 680ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 689ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 668ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim5.1
Utility4.2
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch0.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 658ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1
Positioning3.9
Utility4.2
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact3.8

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time649ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 695ms → last ⅓ avg 649ms
Headshot accuracy16.4%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–7 · inferno, 1 Sept
38%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · mirage, 13 Sept
469msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 3 Sept
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 7 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B38201853%0.01
mirageC1881044%0.01
ancientC167944%0.01
infernoS129375%0.01
cacheA74357%-0.00
anubisS54180%0.01
nuke4040%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches
43%Win rate
0.55Avg K/D
41.9ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

23%1v1 clutch win
7%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21937%0.497.2
Mirage743%0.568.9
Nuke540%0.506.6
Ancient475%0.8710.8
Inferno333%0.518.0
Train10%0.368.0
Anubis1100%0.898.0
Overpass10%0.7414.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
74.1%Counter-strafing
12.9°Preaim
658msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
41.3%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
5.88HE damage / grenade
7.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.9345° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–6-0.0118%18 Sept
ancient13–7-0.014%18 Sept
mirage11–130.0314%18 Sept
inferno13–3-0.018%18 Sept
anubis9–130.0215%18 Sept
dust213–80.0623%18 Sept
dust28–13-0.0512%17 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0312%17 Sept
ancient10–130.018%17 Sept
dust28–13-0.0533%17 Sept
dust211–130.0619%16 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0613%15 Sept
dust25–130.0113%15 Sept
cache7–13-0.0718%15 Sept
inferno9–130.024%14 Sept
dust211–130.0025%14 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0213%14 Sept
anubis13–70.0123%13 Sept
mirage13–30.0038%13 Sept
dust215–15-0.0527%13 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0216%13 Sept
ancient13–70.0221%13 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0417%13 Sept
dust22–13-0.010%13 Sept
mirage13–100.0213%13 Sept
cache13–60.0211%13 Sept
dust27–13-0.0512%12 Sept
dust215–15-0.0312%12 Sept
anubis13–40.0425%12 Sept
dust210–13-0.0315%12 Sept
mirage16–120.0811%12 Sept
ancient6–130.0138%11 Sept
cache13–6-0.0413%11 Sept
dust213–11-0.0323%11 Sept
mirage4–13-0.057%11 Sept
dust213–6-0.0321%10 Sept
dust210–130.0320%10 Sept
dust213–60.0512%10 Sept
dust28–130.0518%9 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0634%9 Sept
mirage11–20.0719%9 Sept
mirage11–13-0.097%9 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0716%9 Sept
ancient13–110.029%8 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0218%8 Sept
mirage4–130.0216%8 Sept
dust213–9-0.0110%8 Sept
dust213–40.1111%5 Sept
dust213–7-0.0310%5 Sept
dust213–11-0.0621%5 Sept
cache10–13-0.0317%4 Sept
mirage13–70.1024%4 Sept
inferno13–110.0320%4 Sept
inferno13–70.0224%3 Sept
inferno13–60.0823%3 Sept
nuke3–9-0.0112%3 Sept
inferno2–13-0.1010%3 Sept
ancient5–130.0219%2 Sept
inferno16–140.0616%2 Sept
ancient3–70.068%2 Sept
ancient13–60.0520%2 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0621%2 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0418%2 Sept
nuke10–130.0512%2 Sept
inferno13–70.1337%1 Sept
ancient1–13-0.0613%1 Sept
dust213–110.0417%1 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0417%1 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0018%1 Sept
mirage1–13-0.019%1 Sept
dust213–40.0119%31 Aug
dust213–11-0.0111%31 Aug
dust213–70.106%31 Aug
ancient13–80.0719%31 Aug
anubis13–90.0112%31 Aug
dust213–100.0319%31 Aug
dust22–10-0.0526%31 Aug
cache13–100.0812%30 Aug
dust29–130.0219%30 Aug
dust213–90.0412%30 Aug
dust213–80.0411%30 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0117%9 Aug
dust215–15-0.0329%9 Aug
ancient6–2-0.0427%8 Aug
mirage1–70.0921%8 Aug
dust213–40.0219%8 Aug
cache10–130.0224%8 Aug
dust214–160.0021%7 Aug
inferno13–100.0828%7 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0416%7 Aug
ancient13–100.0422%7 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0118%7 Aug
dust210–130.0016%7 Aug
dust25–13-0.0820%7 Aug
dust213–2-0.0011%7 Aug
dust213–90.1033%7 Aug
nuke14–160.0417%6 Aug
ancient15–150.0423%6 Aug
cache13–90.0018%6 Aug
dust213–50.0818%6 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →