quase amigo

quase amigo — CS2 Stats

BR76561198939628410[U:1:979362682]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,884Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating14,075Blue band · top ~33.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 1Top 100.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,884 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 44 days played since 6 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,075 -20 7 Jun – 24 Sept · 30 days played
13,50816,069peak 16,0697 Jun24 Sept
16,069Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2026-06-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,994 below peak (16,069)
  • -924 over 30 days · declining
  • -1,433 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 925 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGquase amigoFACEITLevel 1STANDINGTop 100.0% of rankedPREMIER14,075 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning51
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–49–5Last 10046%Win rateWLLLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · −123ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 644ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 706ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility7.2
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels4.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 682ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.1
Utility7.2
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time689ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 729ms → last ⅓ avg 689ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 26 Aug →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · ancient, 7 Jun →
438msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · nuke, 9 Jul →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 26 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 68% over 19dust2Weakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2112–957%0.01
nukeS1913–668%-0.00
ancientB158–753%-0.01
dust2D143–1121%-0.03
infernoB105–550%-0.01
anubisD82–625%-0.00
cacheD82–625%-0.01
overpass—41–325%-0.05
poseidon—10–10%-0.30

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
89.9%Counter-strafing
11.9°Preaim
682msReaction time
27.5%T opening success
54.6%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
10.7%Flash assists
10.07HE damage / grenade
15.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.5195% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–30.0228%22 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0425%22 Sept →
anubis9–130.0023%22 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.1013%30 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0321%30 Aug →
mirage13–20.1018%26 Aug →
nuke13–50.0118%24 Aug →
nuke13–60.0224%23 Aug →
inferno13–80.0420%23 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0120%23 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0912%20 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0120%17 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0536%17 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0310%9 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0318%5 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0540%3 Aug →
mirage13–80.0519%3 Aug →
dust215–15-0.0314%2 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0535%2 Aug →
ancient13–50.0117%2 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0126%2 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0118%2 Aug →
nuke13–50.0221%1 Aug →
cache15–150.0117%1 Aug →
mirage13–70.0539%31 Jul →
nuke13–70.0227%31 Jul →
ancient12–120.0510%30 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.0616%29 Jul →
dust213–60.0330%28 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0222%27 Jul →
inferno13–50.0116%27 Jul →
dust28–13-0.0125%26 Jul →
anubis8–130.0117%26 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0436%26 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0820%26 Jul →
mirage16–140.0724%25 Jul →
inferno13–40.0316%25 Jul →
nuke13–90.0120%21 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.079%16 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0317%16 Jul →
dust215–15-0.0433%16 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0819%15 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.0619%11 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0413%11 Jul →
ancient13–4-0.0125%10 Jul →
nuke16–140.0229%10 Jul →
mirage8–130.0328%10 Jul →
mirage13–30.0621%9 Jul →
mirage5–13-0.0316%9 Jul →
mirage8–130.0217%9 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.0924%9 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0023%6 Jul →
ancient16–13-0.0121%5 Jul →
mirage13–110.0013%5 Jul →
nuke7–130.0021%5 Jul →
inferno6–130.0419%5 Jul →
ancient13–60.0118%5 Jul →
nuke13–3-0.0112%5 Jul →
overpass9–13-0.0619%5 Jul →
mirage13–70.0228%5 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.108%4 Jul →
mirage16–140.0622%29 Jun →
overpass6–130.0037%28 Jun →
anubis13–4-0.027%28 Jun →
dust20–13-0.0633%28 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0317%28 Jun →
nuke13–90.0333%28 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0328%28 Jun →
nuke13–70.0423%27 Jun →
mirage13–5-0.0018%27 Jun →
anubis13–30.0025%27 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0227%27 Jun →
inferno10–130.0330%27 Jun →
dust216–13-0.0421%27 Jun →
nuke13–9-0.0416%27 Jun →
ancient13–90.0225%27 Jun →
nuke8–130.0541%26 Jun →
cache4–130.0423%26 Jun →
ancient14–16-0.0432%25 Jun →
mirage13–110.0224%25 Jun →
anubis12–160.0126%20 Jun →
ancient6–130.0117%19 Jun →
dust21–13-0.1117%19 Jun →
mirage10–130.0528%19 Jun →
dust25–130.0019%19 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0919%18 Jun →
cache8–13-0.0633%16 Jun →
anubis9–130.0018%15 Jun →
ancient16–140.0018%15 Jun →
cache13–40.1028%15 Jun →
inferno13–10-0.0017%14 Jun →
poseidon0–9-0.300%10 Jun →
nuke13–80.0717%9 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0513%8 Jun →
overpass13–8-0.0721%8 Jun →
nuke13–9-0.0032%7 Jun →
ancient13–110.0242%7 Jun →
overpass0–13-0.0717%7 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0534%7 Jun →
cache12–5-0.039%6 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →