xX_tripleTsigma_Xx

xX_tripleTsigma_Xx — CS2 Stats

NO76561198916926678[U:1:956660950]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,080Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating27,794Top 5% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#511 of 19763 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxX_tripleTsigma_XxFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER27,794 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning48
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60382Last 10060%Win rateWWLWLWLTWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.9
Aggression5.6
Utility4.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 90% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning4.8
Utility4.3
Mechanics8.9
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact9.4

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time609ms+24ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy30.4%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 31.6% → last ⅓ avg 30.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.26Best rating — ancient 13–5
131Biggest win — mirage
11Longest win streak
W2Current streak
95In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 9ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA28171161%0.02
dust2A1811761%0.03
poseidonB158753%0.03
cacheS107370%0.05
anubisS97278%0.02
infernoC83538%0.01
ancientD72529%0.01
nuke330100%0.05
eldorado110100%0.09
warden110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

280Matches
54%Win rate
1.34Avg K/D
90.0ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11448%1.3317.8
Dust24461%1.3817.9
Anubis3540%1.2317.1
Ancient2857%1.3417.9
Nuke2070%1.6023.2
Cache1675%1.3416.4
Overpass1050%1.1817.4
Inferno850%1.1720.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.4%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.3%Spray accuracy
90.1%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
577msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
37.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
7.94HE damage / grenade
7.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.0916% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
poseidon9–70.1129%1 Aug
poseidon9–50.0919%1 Aug
poseidon7–90.0144%1 Aug
poseidon9–60.1753%1 Aug
poseidon7–9-0.0223%1 Aug
poseidon9–7-0.0431%1 Aug
poseidon3–90.0329%1 Aug
poseidon8–80.0031%1 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0341%30 Jul
cache13–60.0931%30 Jul
dust20–13-0.0633%28 Jul
dust20–13-0.0940%28 Jul
dust23–13-0.0232%26 Jul
mirage13–30.0130%25 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0136%24 Jul
dust213–70.0423%24 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0516%24 Jul
inferno9–60.0432%23 Jul
mirage13–10.1927%23 Jul
anubis13–20.0317%21 Jul
anubis13–160.0229%20 Jul
dust28–130.0130%20 Jul
dust24–130.0527%19 Jul
mirage7–13-0.1213%19 Jul
dust20–3-0.0133%19 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0515%19 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0850%18 Jul
dust26–00.1136%18 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0225%17 Jul
mirage13–20.0720%17 Jul
inferno9–10.1232%17 Jul
mirage13–100.0842%17 Jul
mirage9–130.1035%16 Jul
dust213–60.0226%16 Jul
anubis13–90.0626%15 Jul
poseidon9–10.2423%14 Jul
poseidon9–40.0235%14 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0740%13 Jul
dust213–40.0647%13 Jul
ancient3–7-0.1030%13 Jul
poseidon9–60.0132%13 Jul
cache13–20.0129%13 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0314%13 Jul
dust213–4-0.0446%13 Jul
cache13–2-0.0036%13 Jul
cache13–5-0.0031%13 Jul
dust213–60.0325%13 Jul
mirage13–20.0229%13 Jul
anubis13–110.026%12 Jul
nuke13–100.0438%12 Jul
mirage13–50.0536%12 Jul
inferno3–90.0122%12 Jul
poseidon6–9-0.0539%12 Jul
poseidon3–9-0.0722%12 Jul
poseidon9–00.0529%12 Jul
mirage13–90.0836%12 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0024%12 Jul
cache13–100.1031%12 Jul
mirage13–70.0632%12 Jul
ancient13–50.2649%12 Jul
cache6–13-0.0432%11 Jul
nuke13–40.0136%11 Jul
dust213–11-0.0238%11 Jul
anubis15–15-0.0440%11 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0320%11 Jul
mirage13–60.0517%11 Jul
dust213–110.0319%10 Jul
dust213–70.1028%10 Jul
dust213–40.1538%10 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0329%10 Jul
cache7–130.0432%10 Jul
inferno2–9-0.1150%10 Jul
cache4–130.2239%10 Jul
inferno3–9-0.0119%10 Jul
cache13–70.0325%10 Jul
mirage13–100.1039%10 Jul
dust213–40.0527%10 Jul
mirage13–50.1719%10 Jul
eldorado9–30.0933%10 Jul
mirage13–20.0222%9 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0427%9 Jul
cache13–50.0630%9 Jul
nuke5–30.1047%9 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0133%9 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0216%9 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0120%9 Jul
anubis13–110.2234%8 Jul
warden13–110.0927%8 Jul
poseidon7–9-0.0747%7 Jul
mirage6–130.0228%7 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0519%7 Jul
inferno7–9-0.0525%7 Jul
dust23–130.0731%6 Jul
inferno9–70.1343%5 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0720%5 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0875%5 Jul
ancient0–30.0438%5 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0127%5 Jul
mirage13–20.0119%5 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0136%4 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →