phopz — CS2 Stats

76561198913832138[U:1:953566410]Steam profile ↗

1,482Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.4 StrongEntry Fragger

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,446 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95

Positioning66

Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–51Last 10049%Win rateWLWLWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim9.5

Aggression10.0

Utility6.6

Positioning6.6

Opening Duels6.4

Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 75% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 75% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5

Positioning6.6

Utility6.6

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels5.7

Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time468ms−78ms

first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 468ms

Headshot accuracy23.3%+2.0%

first ⅓ avg 21.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — mirage 13–9

13–1Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

7–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 56% over 9vertigoWeakest map · 46% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	67	34–33	51%	0.04
vertigo	B	13	6–7	46%	0.05
cache	A	9	5–4	56%	0.01
anubis	—	4	2–2	50%	0.04
ancient	—	3	0–3	0%	0.02
inferno	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02
train	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04
dust2	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02
nuke	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,420Matches

56%Win rate

1.15Avg K/D

82.5ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	363	67%	1.27	17.6
Ancient	125	48%	1.06	15.2
Anubis	87	49%	1.10	15.5
Dust2	57	46%	1.08	15.5
Nuke	40	48%	1.23	17.1
Overpass	24	42%	1.02	17.0
Inferno	23	43%	0.92	14.4
Train	17	35%	1.11	17.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy

41.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

49.4%Spray accuracy

78.7%Counter-strafing

8.3°Preaim

473msReaction time

35.9%T opening success

75.0%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

10.9%Flash assists

7.59HE damage / grenade

15.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.9055% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
vertigo	13–2	0.13	24%	28 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.01	29%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.02	22%	28 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	15%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.06	17%	27 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	21%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.07	26%	27 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	27%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.03	27%	27 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.09	41%	26 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	27%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.09	31%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.06	33%	24 Aug →
train	10–13	-0.04	18%	24 Aug →
anubis	8–0	0.11	7%	24 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	25%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.07	14%	22 Aug →
vertigo	7–13	-0.03	22%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.01	22%	22 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	-0.01	11%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.07	25%	22 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.01	25%	22 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	0.01	18%	21 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.03	31%	20 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.03	20%	20 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.05	33%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.04	32%	19 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.05	20%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	18%	19 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.05	32%	19 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.02	17%	18 Aug →
mirage	15–19	0.05	23%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.06	18%	17 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	0.00	16%	17 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.10	11%	16 Aug →
mirage	0–8	-0.08	20%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.11	29%	14 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	8%	14 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.08	38%	14 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.02	18%	14 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	0.01	21%	14 Aug →
vertigo	13–5	0.09	28%	14 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.03	33%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.17	27%	12 Aug →
vertigo	8–13	-0.03	15%	12 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.02	54%	10 Aug →
mirage	3–10	-0.06	4%	10 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.09	35%	9 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.00	27%	8 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.00	16%	8 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.05	21%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.07	27%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.12	20%	5 Aug →
vertigo	4–13	0.05	16%	5 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.03	10%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.16	24%	5 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	17%	4 Aug →
vertigo	14–16	0.08	13%	4 Aug →
mirage	22–20	0.04	9%	4 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.01	22%	4 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.10	17%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.21	30%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.00	17%	2 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.03	19%	2 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.04	20%	1 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	22%	1 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.00	24%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.20	36%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.08	22%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.14	30%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.09	18%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.18	37%	31 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.04	17%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.07	15%	31 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	22%	30 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	22%	30 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	19%	30 Jul →
mirage	12–16	0.03	20%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	21%	29 Jul →
vertigo	13–11	0.15	20%	29 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.14	14%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	27%	29 Jul →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	16%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.02	21%	28 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.06	14%	28 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.04	16%	28 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.04	20%	28 Jul →
cache	19–17	-0.00	12%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.04	15%	28 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.05	17%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.05	19%	28 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.00	32%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.01	16%	27 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.06	16%	27 Jul →
vertigo	11–13	0.07	22%	27 Jul →
mirage	0–8	-0.03	25%	27 Jul →
vertigo	13–5	0.09	31%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.08	21%	27 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.01	27%	26 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.05	22%	26 Jul →