training arc 16.09.2026

training arc 16.09.2026 — CS2 Stats

76561198892611286[U:1:932345558]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

295Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,887 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 295 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 70 days played since 23 Jun 2023. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,966 +4,459 18 Jan23 Jun · 9 days played
7,50712,881peak 12,88118 Jan23 Jun
12,881Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,887Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
70Days played since 2023-06-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,887
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 114 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtraining arc 16.09.2026FACEITLevel 9 · 1,887 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,887csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning52
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49438Last 10049%Win rateLLWTLWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −9.2pp headshot accuracy · −96ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 1163 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility4.5
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch4.2

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 596ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.2
Utility4.5
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact8.1

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time594ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy26.6%+5.8%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 26.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 4–0 · mirage, 4 Dec
52%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · mirage, 2 Mar
383msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · mirage, 17 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 2 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
35In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 14nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB42192345%0.02
ancientA149564%0.02
dust2B105550%0.05
anubisB63350%0.01
officeC52340%0.01
nukeD51420%0.05
infernoA53260%0.05
overpassA53260%0.01
cache31233%-0.00
train32167%0.02
vertigo21150%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

436Matches
53%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
81.4ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18658%1.2017.6
Dust27450%1.1615.7
Anubis5048%1.1116.5
Ancient4551%1.1317.2
Overpass2962%1.1317.0
Nuke2650%1.0716.3
Cache1040%1.4116.4
Inferno1040%0.9116.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.9%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
88.2%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
596msReaction time
35.6%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
4.79HE damage / grenade
10.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.624% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.1322%17 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0836%17 Aug
dust213–20.0221%8 Aug
mirage12–120.0432%8 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0214%21 Jul
cache13–110.0218%21 Jul
office10–13-0.0117%12 Jul
mirage13–100.0429%12 Jul
dust21–60.0817%12 Jul
train13–100.0220%10 Jul
nuke13–60.1044%10 Jul
vertigo12–120.0523%10 Jul
mirage13–1-0.0113%8 Jul
mirage13–50.1127%8 Jul
dust26–130.0745%8 Jul
train13–60.0641%1 Jul
ancient13–50.0834%1 Jul
inferno13–70.0227%1 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0227%1 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0038%30 Jun
office13–9-0.0021%29 Jun
mirage0–13-0.0323%23 Jun
ancient16–13-0.0230%23 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0726%23 Jun
dust216–140.0329%21 Jun
anubis2–13-0.0619%21 Jun
ancient13–40.0515%17 Jun
ancient13–100.0727%17 Jun
mirage12–160.0325%16 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0132%16 Jun
dust25–130.0632%15 Jun
ancient13–100.0128%25 May
mirage13–30.1328%17 May
mirage13–30.0322%13 May
cache5–13-0.0422%13 May
mirage0–13-0.070%13 May
dust213–4-0.0421%14 Apr
mirage12–120.1029%9 Apr
office13–100.0518%1 Apr
office10–130.0311%1 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0024%1 Apr
nuke6–13-0.0218%25 Mar
dust213–20.0834%17 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0321%3 Mar
mirage13–00.0652%2 Mar
anubis13–30.0619%2 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0321%27 Feb
dust213–20.1417%27 Feb
dust25–130.0525%21 Feb
overpass13–50.0716%21 Feb
mirage9–130.0019%20 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0027%19 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0217%15 Feb
mirage13–50.0031%18 Jan
ancient8–130.0317%18 Jan
ancient5–130.0019%7 Jan
mirage6–130.0930%31 Dec
mirage11–130.0615%25 Dec
mirage13–70.0430%18 Dec
dust27–130.0218%16 Dec
overpass13–70.0224%25 Nov
ancient16–140.0120%29 Aug
mirage13–30.0923%27 Aug
mirage13–90.0629%25 Aug
mirage8–50.0438%25 Aug
mirage4–130.0035%15 Aug
inferno14–160.0626%31 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0421%27 Jul
office12–12-0.0416%26 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0333%24 Jul
overpass13–50.0415%23 Jul
ancient16–120.0416%20 Jul
overpass8–13-0.0219%18 Jul
ancient13–60.0826%18 Jul
inferno13–50.0419%18 Jul
anubis13–30.0127%5 Jul
nuke12–120.0820%4 Jul
train4–13-0.0232%29 Jun
nuke12–120.0723%27 Jun
mirage9–110.0622%1 Mar
ancient1–13-0.0420%4 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0619%1 Jan
inferno13–10.1332%30 Dec
mirage13–90.1125%26 Dec
mirage4–00.2532%4 Dec
mirage13–90.0320%28 Nov
mirage13–30.0216%27 Jun
anubis13–90.0714%23 Jun
vertigo13–60.0427%23 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0122%5 Apr
mirage7–130.0836%30 Mar
cache6–160.0124%15 Sept
mirage15–150.0316%2 Sept
mirage11–13-0.030%1 Sept
mirage9–16-0.0221%1 Sept
mirage16–13-0.0123%30 Aug
mirage16–70.045%28 Aug
mirage0–14-0.0118%24 Aug
mirage16–70.0519%20 Aug
overpass2–16-0.064%23 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →