pieniliisa

pieniliisa — CS2 Stats

76561198886145938[U:1:925880210]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,254Tracked matches37%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,725Blue band · top ~35.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,360 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,725 +3,318 13 Sept – 18 Oct · 12 days played
10,40714,231peak 14,23113 Sept18 Oct
14,331Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,360Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
14Days played since 2026-09-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,360
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 171 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier CS Rating

  • 506 below peak (14,231)
  • +3,318 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,275 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-13
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpieniliisaFACEITLevel 5 · 1,360 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER13,725 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,360csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning76
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–54–3Last 10043%Win rateLLWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.06 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · −69ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 486ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Last 20

  • 6–13–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim4.6
Utility6.2
Positioning7.6
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 61% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 65% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 65% on T to 47% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning7.6
Utility6.2
Mechanics3.4
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact0.6

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time544ms+7ms
first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 544ms
Headshot accuracy10.9%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 10.4% → last ⅓ avg 10.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 10 Oct →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 0–9 · overpass, 2 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 9–4 · nuke, 14 Oct →
13–3Biggest win · nuke, 15 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 47% over 45overpassWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB4521–2447%0.00
nukeC208–1240%-0.02
vertigoC94–544%-0.08
overpassD60–60%-0.09
dust2—40–40%-0.01
mirage—32–167%-0.04
anubis—32–167%-0.00
poseidon—32–167%0.08
debris—32–167%0.04
cache—32–167%-0.02
ancient—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

215Matches
52%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
78.3ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno5949%0.9913.9
Ancient4363%1.1216.3
Nuke3256%1.0415.4
Anubis3161%0.9914.8
Dust22627%0.8514.0
Train367%0.879.3
Overpass2100%0.7612.0
Mirage250%1.1215.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.8%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
65.2%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
534msReaction time
64.7%T opening success
46.9%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
9.71HE damage / grenade
8.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.8401% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–130.0412%18 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.096%18 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0614%18 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.092%16 Oct →
nuke9–130.0119%16 Oct →
inferno9–10.213%16 Oct →
nuke9–40.148%16 Oct →
inferno4–9-0.0415%16 Oct →
overpass7–90.0112%16 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.0915%16 Oct →
nuke6–9-0.1716%16 Oct →
inferno4–9-0.0719%16 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0010%15 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.018%15 Oct →
nuke7–9-0.096%15 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.0812%15 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.037%15 Oct →
vertigo9–7-0.0618%15 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0711%15 Oct →
dust210–13-0.019%14 Oct →
anubis13–60.036%14 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0114%14 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.028%14 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.138%14 Oct →
nuke6–9-0.0313%14 Oct →
nuke9–40.1714%14 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0617%13 Oct →
vertigo9–60.0213%13 Oct →
vertigo1–9-0.210%13 Oct →
inferno9–4-0.0214%13 Oct →
inferno9–30.1211%13 Oct →
nuke7–9-0.038%13 Oct →
vertigo3–9-0.1513%12 Oct →
poseidon9–20.1713%12 Oct →
inferno9–40.1013%12 Oct →
inferno9–70.0015%12 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.0914%12 Oct →
inferno9–70.1723%12 Oct →
nuke7–90.006%12 Oct →
vertigo7–9-0.0315%12 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0810%12 Oct →
nuke13–30.0414%12 Oct →
overpass7–90.0310%12 Oct →
vertigo9–20.059%12 Oct →
poseidon9–70.0316%12 Oct →
debris9–40.106%12 Oct →
nuke9–00.157%12 Oct →
inferno9–10.0817%12 Oct →
inferno9–60.0920%11 Oct →
inferno9–60.096%11 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0313%11 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0318%10 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0310%10 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.105%10 Oct →
mirage13–60.048%10 Oct →
cache13–3-0.009%10 Oct →
inferno9–10.2610%10 Oct →
nuke8–3-0.0513%10 Oct →
overpass7–9-0.052%10 Oct →
nuke9–5-0.062%10 Oct →
inferno4–9-0.1116%10 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.035%9 Oct →
nuke0–9-0.210%9 Oct →
nuke6–90.0416%9 Oct →
inferno9–30.136%9 Oct →
inferno8–80.054%9 Oct →
nuke3–9-0.139%4 Oct →
inferno9–7-0.016%4 Oct →
debris5–9-0.0524%4 Oct →
inferno9–20.2215%4 Oct →
overpass1–9-0.2014%4 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.0118%4 Oct →
inferno9–4-0.0512%4 Oct →
nuke9–5-0.004%4 Oct →
inferno9–5-0.108%4 Oct →
inferno9–20.177%4 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.038%3 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0110%3 Oct →
cache10–13-0.016%3 Oct →
inferno9–60.033%3 Oct →
nuke5–9-0.123%3 Oct →
vertigo4–9-0.1510%3 Oct →
inferno6–9-0.0415%2 Oct →
overpass3–9-0.0916%2 Oct →
dust26–130.0213%2 Oct →
debris9–50.0510%2 Oct →
inferno2–9-0.0110%2 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.1113%2 Oct →
poseidon8–80.0512%2 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.105%2 Oct →
inferno9–10.166%2 Oct →
overpass0–9-0.2542%2 Oct →
cache13–10-0.038%1 Oct →
inferno16–140.019%1 Oct →
vertigo9–50.028%1 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.250%1 Oct →
inferno9–40.0612%1 Oct →
inferno5–9-0.057%1 Oct →
vertigo6–9-0.160%26 Sept →
inferno7–90.039%26 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.