BLUEBERRYBOY

BLUEBERRYBOY — CS2 Stats

76561198885546757[U:1:925281029]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,135Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,881 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Aug 2026 (24 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,881 → 1,881
+52Tracked matches · now 2,135
+3.3ppWin rate · 50.0% → 53.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 56 days played since 3 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,955 +1,714 30 May31 May · 2 days played
21,24122,955peak 22,95530 May31 May
22,955Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,881Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
56Days played since 2026-04-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,881
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 120 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBLUEBERRYBOYFACEITLevel 9 · 1,881 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,881csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning64
Utility23

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4060Last 10040%Win rateLWLWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.06 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · +14ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 495ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility2.3
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning6.4
Utility2.3
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time512ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 535ms → last ⅓ avg 512ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 23 Aug
32%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · mirage, 27 Jul
406msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · mirage, 27 Aug
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 23 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 89% over 9ancientWeakest map · 24% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisD1951426%-0.01
ancientD1741324%-0.01
infernoB168850%-0.01
nukeC145936%-0.01
mirageC146843%-0.00
dust2S98189%0.04
cache42250%0.02
overpass42250%0.03
vertigo3030%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (24% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,227Matches
50%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
78.4ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage47351%1.1016.2
Ancient29449%1.0216.4
Inferno27753%1.1015.7
Anubis21347%1.0215.3
Nuke13755%1.0916.5
Dust212044%1.0114.7
Overpass6551%1.0717.3
Train3053%1.1617.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
509msReaction time
44.6%T opening success
55.4%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
7.60HE damage / grenade
2.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3531 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

24% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–13-0.0718%14 Sept
dust213–7-0.0226%14 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0117%8 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0118%8 Sept
nuke2–13-0.156%7 Sept
inferno13–110.0119%3 Sept
nuke13–90.0220%31 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0013%27 Aug
dust213–110.0721%24 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0216%24 Aug
inferno3–0-0.020%24 Aug
ancient13–110.1022%23 Aug
dust213–10.1124%23 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0524%23 Aug
dust213–110.0923%22 Aug
cache13–70.108%18 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0023%18 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0320%17 Aug
mirage13–110.0432%6 Aug
dust213–40.0915%6 Aug
mirage5–130.0528%5 Aug
ancient2–130.0324%5 Aug
dust213–90.0026%5 Aug
inferno13–100.036%4 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0211%4 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0514%3 Aug
anubis11–130.0121%3 Aug
anubis10–130.0517%3 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0411%1 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0115%31 Jul
nuke13–90.0418%31 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0221%31 Jul
mirage9–13-0.1012%30 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0417%29 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0117%28 Jul
mirage13–100.0520%28 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0032%27 Jul
cache8–13-0.0116%23 Jul
ancient13–90.0719%23 Jul
anubis5–130.0116%21 Jul
anubis4–130.0219%19 Jul
mirage8–130.0012%11 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0416%11 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0216%8 Jul
ancient16–190.0113%8 Jul
anubis20–220.0214%7 Jul
nuke13–80.0317%2 Jul
ancient5–130.0110%2 Jul
overpass13–160.009%2 Jul
inferno19–17-0.0016%1 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0113%1 Jul
nuke11–13-0.027%1 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0220%29 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0711%29 Jun
overpass13–9-0.0213%28 Jun
ancient13–9-0.018%26 Jun
inferno16–19-0.066%26 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0416%20 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0512%17 Jun
inferno25–220.0113%14 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0020%13 Jun
inferno8–130.0013%13 Jun
overpass13–50.0718%13 Jun
nuke13–16-0.0319%10 Jun
anubis7–130.0423%31 May
inferno0–8-0.0320%31 May
vertigo10–13-0.0216%31 May
mirage11–130.0012%31 May
overpass11–130.0615%31 May
nuke13–60.0820%30 May
inferno6–13-0.0313%30 May
mirage13–70.0826%30 May
vertigo6–13-0.0411%30 May
cache13–90.0122%30 May
nuke6–13-0.0610%30 May
anubis13–100.0316%30 May
anubis8–13-0.0113%29 May
nuke7–13-0.0120%24 May
nuke3–130.0126%24 May
ancient16–190.0115%22 May
cache3–130.0013%21 May
inferno13–16-0.007%21 May
ancient2–13-0.1413%14 May
ancient8–13-0.045%12 May
anubis7–13-0.0315%12 May
anubis13–10-0.0522%10 May
anubis7–130.0018%10 May
inferno13–70.0818%10 May
anubis13–70.0316%6 May
ancient2–13-0.0527%5 May
nuke13–8-0.0416%5 May
ancient11–13-0.0013%3 May
dust27–13-0.0230%24 Apr
inferno6–13-0.030%21 Apr
mirage13–7-0.018%12 Apr
inferno7–13-0.035%12 Apr
vertigo4–9-0.0214%11 Apr
dust213–11-0.039%10 Apr
ancient13–10-0.028%6 Apr
dust213–20.0619%3 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →