0xZero

0xZero — CS2 Stats

AE76561198874075401[U:1:913809673]Steam profile ↗

3,240Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,520Purple band · top ~18.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5621 of 9791 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG0xZeroFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER17,520 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning50
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43525Last 10043%Win rateLLLWLWLTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression6.6
Utility7.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.0
Utility7.4
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time565ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — ancient 13–4
130Biggest win — inferno
7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 15anubisWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC36152142%-0.00
ancientC2181338%-0.01
cacheA159660%-0.01
anubisD124833%-0.04
nukeD62433%-0.04
mirageD62433%-0.01
dust232167%0.01
vertigo110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,144Matches
50%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
72.9ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno33660%1.0415.8
Anubis19746%0.8813.4
Ancient18748%0.9113.6
Mirage11741%0.8513.7
Vertigo10442%0.9515.5
Dust23540%0.8113.9
Nuke3435%0.8113.3
Train3241%0.7412.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
29.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
575msReaction time
32.0%T opening success
48.4%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
12.8%Flash assists
13.14HE damage / grenade
12.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.003% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke9–13-0.0320%28 Aug
inferno1–13-0.067%27 Aug
dust25–13-0.0150%27 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0436%27 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0229%27 Aug
inferno13–30.0431%26 Aug
inferno13–16-0.069%26 Aug
inferno15–150.0419%26 Aug
cache8–13-0.0618%25 Aug
inferno13–20.0711%25 Aug
anubis11–130.0220%25 Aug
cache13–80.0629%25 Aug
ancient11–130.0423%25 Aug
cache13–5-0.0426%25 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0017%24 Aug
ancient11–130.0515%24 Aug
mirage13–100.0416%24 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0711%23 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0313%23 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0324%23 Aug
cache13–30.0124%23 Aug
inferno13–80.0719%23 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0019%23 Aug
vertigo13–10-0.0343%22 Aug
inferno13–100.1018%21 Aug
cache16–14-0.0517%20 Aug
inferno10–130.0023%20 Aug
anubis1–13-0.100%20 Aug
anubis5–130.0124%20 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0730%19 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0110%19 Aug
inferno13–40.0334%19 Aug
ancient7–13-0.034%19 Aug
cache2–13-0.1317%19 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0223%18 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0710%18 Aug
inferno13–0-0.0322%18 Aug
mirage13–70.0129%18 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0136%17 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0238%17 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0620%17 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0523%17 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0540%17 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0814%16 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0721%16 Aug
ancient15–150.0121%16 Aug
inferno15–150.0425%15 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0218%15 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0333%15 Aug
inferno0–13-0.0236%15 Aug
inferno11–130.0114%15 Aug
inferno13–11-0.029%15 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0215%15 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0519%15 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0218%15 Aug
nuke13–4-0.0020%15 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0912%14 Aug
cache13–110.1134%14 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0229%14 Aug
dust213–11-0.0235%14 Aug
cache13–8-0.0229%14 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0512%13 Aug
inferno13–90.0825%13 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0314%13 Aug
inferno13–16-0.015%13 Aug
cache13–8-0.0421%13 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0121%13 Aug
inferno8–130.0123%12 Aug
inferno13–50.0318%12 Aug
anubis15–15-0.038%12 Aug
cache13–160.0130%12 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0530%12 Aug
anubis4–2-0.150%12 Aug
cache15–150.0329%12 Aug
nuke5–13-0.1013%11 Aug
ancient13–70.0119%11 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0313%11 Aug
cache10–13-0.0112%11 Aug
cache13–10-0.0318%11 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0313%11 Aug
cache2–13-0.0338%11 Aug
inferno13–100.0311%11 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0423%10 Aug
ancient8–130.0118%10 Aug
inferno13–80.0320%10 Aug
anubis13–70.0129%10 Aug
inferno2–130.0524%10 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0125%10 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0720%10 Aug
dust213–40.0532%10 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0425%10 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0450%10 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1525%10 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0237%9 Aug
ancient9–130.0521%8 Aug
ancient13–90.0336%8 Aug
ancient13–40.1126%8 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0136%8 Aug
cache13–3-0.0029%8 Aug
mirage11–130.0119%8 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →