EGG

EGG — CS2 Stats

MY76561198873122355[U:1:912856627]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

419Tracked matches48%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,901Blue band · top ~44.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3 · 871 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−553Premier CS Rating · 12,454 → 11,901
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 53 days played since 24 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,901 +3,700 24 May17 Sept · 46 days played
8,20116,445peak 16,44524 May17 Sept
16,562Peak Premier in tracked matches
871Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
53Days played since 2026-05-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 871
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 30 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,544 below peak (16,445)
  • -2,773 over 30 days · declining
  • +1,737 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 3,099 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEGGFACEITLevel 3 · 871 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER11,901 · Blue bandPEAK ELO871csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning52
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47476Last 10047%Win rateLLWLTWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 534ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 656ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility3.1
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 643ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.2
Utility3.1
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time658ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 675ms → last ⅓ avg 658ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–10 · mirage, 11 Jul
56%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · anubis, 10 Jun
453msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · nuke, 17 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 1 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 78% over 9anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB37181949%-0.01
dust2B24111346%-0.03
ancientB136746%-0.02
infernoC114736%-0.03
nukeS97278%-0.01
anubisD61517%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

134Matches
45%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
74.1ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4547%0.9014.6
Dust22339%0.8614.1
Inferno1759%0.8612.8
Anubis1638%0.7313.0
Ancient1644%1.1716.1
Vertigo825%0.7513.6
Nuke683%1.5421.3
Cache10%0.9027.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
86.2%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
643msReaction time
37.3%T opening success
49.7%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
3.85HE damage / grenade
5.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.2542% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke5–13-0.0123%17 Sept
ancient14–16-0.0513%15 Sept
dust213–5-0.0623%15 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0612%15 Sept
mirage15–15-0.0220%14 Sept
nuke13–90.0217%12 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0315%12 Sept
dust213–30.0226%12 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0716%11 Sept
mirage13–3-0.0210%11 Sept
dust213–10-0.0727%11 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0616%11 Sept
mirage5–130.0115%11 Sept
dust22–7-0.0910%10 Sept
dust29–13-0.0019%10 Sept
dust213–8-0.0138%8 Sept
dust210–13-0.0112%3 Sept
anubis6–13-0.0411%3 Sept
anubis13–60.0623%3 Sept
mirage7–3-0.0533%1 Sept
mirage13–10.0629%1 Sept
dust24–13-0.0926%31 Aug
mirage13–50.0517%31 Aug
dust213–10-0.0333%31 Aug
mirage2–12-0.1211%30 Aug
nuke13–110.0424%29 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0117%29 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0019%29 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0214%29 Aug
dust213–9-0.0432%28 Aug
anubis6–13-0.1111%27 Aug
dust213–7-0.026%27 Aug
dust26–130.0624%21 Aug
inferno10–130.0925%15 Aug
dust214–16-0.0219%15 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0621%14 Aug
dust29–13-0.1015%14 Aug
nuke9–2-0.0424%14 Aug
dust213–8-0.0316%13 Aug
mirage1–13-0.1017%12 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0917%6 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0225%6 Aug
inferno2–13-0.1011%5 Aug
mirage13–80.0012%1 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0220%1 Aug
mirage15–150.0529%31 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0512%31 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0614%30 Jul
nuke16–140.0520%25 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0023%25 Jul
mirage0–13-0.077%24 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0429%24 Jul
dust213–70.0112%24 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0123%23 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0331%19 Jul
mirage13–80.019%19 Jul
mirage13–70.0526%18 Jul
dust216–12-0.0324%18 Jul
inferno2–13-0.1010%16 Jul
mirage13–20.0928%16 Jul
dust29–13-0.0119%16 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0619%15 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0211%15 Jul
mirage13–30.0927%14 Jul
ancient13–60.0620%14 Jul
inferno13–80.0226%14 Jul
dust21–13-0.0517%14 Jul
ancient13–50.0524%13 Jul
mirage13–100.0923%11 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0213%11 Jul
mirage13–30.0012%11 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0117%10 Jul
inferno13–100.0226%5 Jul
mirage13–80.0027%5 Jul
mirage8–130.0218%5 Jul
mirage13–80.0120%1 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0819%28 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0428%25 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0329%24 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0429%24 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0624%24 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0421%19 Jun
mirage7–130.0120%18 Jun
dust21–13-0.0711%16 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0427%12 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0418%11 Jun
dust25–00.000%11 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0656%10 Jun
dust29–130.0025%8 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0131%8 Jun
ancient13–90.0130%8 Jun
dust22–13-0.0625%7 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0218%4 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0326%3 Jun
ancient13–80.0232%27 May
dust25–13-0.0220%27 May
ancient13–8-0.089%25 May
mirage12–120.0216%25 May
mirage13–30.0731%25 May
mirage14–16-0.0317%24 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →