PHRISK

PHRISK — CS2 Stats

DK76561198859380997[U:1:899115269]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,219Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,654 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (18 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,654 → 2,654
+21Tracked matches · now 4,219
−3.3ppWin rate · 50.0% → 46.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 57 days played since 3 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,104 +3 14 Jan25 Apr · 2 days played
20,10120,104peak 20,10414 Jan25 Apr
20,104Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,654Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
57Days played since 2026-01-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,654
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 346 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPHRISKFACEITLevel 10 · 2,654 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,654csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning53
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60382Last 10060%Win rateLLLWWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +11.1pp headshot accuracy · +40ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 40%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 585ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility5.4
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.3
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time577ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy27.0%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 27.4% → last ⅓ avg 27.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.32Best match rating · 9–3 · nuke, 14 Jan
75%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · nuke, 16 Sept
344msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · inferno, 7 Jan
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 16 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

14Longest win streak
L3Current streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 82% over 39anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS3932782%0.01
nukeC145936%0.03
mirageS128467%0.04
ancientA106460%0.02
cacheC83538%-0.01
anubisD61517%-0.02
dust2A53260%0.00
vertigo41325%-0.01
boulder110100%-0.02
overpass1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,493Matches
51%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
78.6ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient21751%1.0515.9
Nuke20157%1.1516.3
Inferno15544%1.1116.1
Anubis15450%1.0115.2
Mirage15446%1.1716.6
Dust214950%1.0816.1
Vertigo9163%1.2218.0
Overpass5159%1.1617.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.5%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
565msReaction time
34.1%T opening success
43.0%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
11.9%Flash assists
8.73HE damage / grenade
7.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1459% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke2–13-0.0675%16 Sept
ancient14–160.0326%6 Sept
cache8–13-0.0036%5 Sept
ancient13–60.0431%22 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0233%8 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0322%8 Aug
dust213–60.0328%3 Aug
boulder13–6-0.0229%13 Jul
nuke2–6-0.0325%4 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0223%28 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0121%24 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0923%24 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0129%18 Jun
dust23–13-0.090%18 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0027%18 Jun
vertigo6–13-0.0827%17 Jun
inferno11–13-0.020%16 Jun
dust213–10.0735%13 Jun
inferno9–50.0433%13 Jun
cache13–110.0122%10 Jun
inferno13–60.0021%3 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0220%3 Jun
ancient4–130.0224%3 Jun
ancient13–40.0115%1 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0028%1 Jun
cache3–5-0.0630%29 May
anubis5–13-0.0738%28 May
ancient13–7-0.0018%27 May
anubis16–120.0115%27 May
ancient16–120.0134%26 May
ancient13–110.0931%21 May
cache13–10-0.0052%20 May
cache5–13-0.0220%19 May
cache5–13-0.010%19 May
cache10–130.0039%17 May
cache13–7-0.0321%29 Apr
mirage13–100.0334%25 Apr
inferno13–40.0735%25 Apr
dust213–80.0649%25 Apr
inferno13–60.0834%25 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0326%25 Apr
mirage13–70.1536%25 Apr
inferno13–70.0023%21 Apr
inferno10–130.0735%18 Apr
inferno16–12-0.0047%18 Apr
mirage13–110.1126%8 Apr
nuke13–70.0531%8 Apr
mirage13–80.1230%5 Apr
mirage13–10.1527%5 Apr
nuke3–12-0.109%29 Mar
nuke13–50.0324%28 Mar
mirage3–60.0835%18 Mar
inferno13–30.0214%13 Mar
inferno13–40.0228%13 Mar
inferno13–2-0.0215%13 Mar
mirage13–80.0431%9 Mar
nuke10–130.0030%7 Mar
mirage13–110.0224%7 Mar
inferno13–100.0922%7 Mar
inferno13–90.0421%6 Mar
anubis2–13-0.0525%6 Mar
nuke13–80.0423%6 Mar
anubis11–130.0216%3 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0220%3 Mar
inferno7–13-0.089%2 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0533%2 Mar
nuke6–130.0129%28 Feb
nuke8–130.0535%6 Feb
inferno7–13-0.0927%28 Jan
dust24–6-0.0717%27 Jan
vertigo12–12-0.0321%24 Jan
inferno13–11-0.0224%20 Jan
inferno13–0-0.0314%16 Jan
inferno13–50.0222%15 Jan
nuke8–80.1027%15 Jan
inferno13–50.0226%14 Jan
inferno13–3-0.0627%14 Jan
inferno13–50.2026%14 Jan
nuke9–30.3236%14 Jan
inferno13–2-0.0335%13 Jan
inferno13–60.0235%13 Jan
inferno13–100.0725%11 Jan
inferno13–40.0129%11 Jan
inferno13–4-0.0016%11 Jan
inferno13–11-0.0021%11 Jan
inferno13–6-0.0423%9 Jan
inferno13–110.0224%9 Jan
inferno13–30.0114%8 Jan
inferno13–60.0333%8 Jan
overpass10–13-0.0322%7 Jan
inferno13–3-0.0733%7 Jan
inferno13–60.0430%7 Jan
vertigo9–130.0748%6 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0227%6 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0756%4 Jan
mirage4–13-0.0524%4 Jan
vertigo13–30.0119%4 Jan
inferno13–4-0.0426%3 Jan
inferno13–1-0.0121%3 Jan
inferno13–00.1142%3 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches14-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →