Zero

Zero — CS2 Stats

76561198848484199[U:1:888218471]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

830Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,000Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#73306 of 222964 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,171 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 31 days played since 17 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,000 +269 17 Jun14 Sept · 20 days played
18,66521,268peak 21,26817 Jun14 Sept
21,640Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,171Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-06-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,171
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 30 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,268 below peak (21,268)
  • -763 over 30 days · declining
  • +269 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZeroFACEITLevel 5 · 1,171 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER20,000 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,171csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning47
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51454Last 10051%Win rateLLLLLWLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 10

  • 271 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Last 20

  • 7112 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.2
Utility5.3
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch2.4

Excellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.7
Utility5.3
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time549ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 549ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 8 Jul
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · mirage, 22 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · inferno, 6 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 24 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L5Current streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB55272849%0.01
cacheS1310377%0.02
anubisA95456%0.00
dust2C94544%0.00
infernoD81713%-0.01
ancientS54180%0.04
nuke1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

26Matches
62%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
87.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage786%1.7615.9
Ancient540%1.0813.0
Inferno475%1.2415.3
Anubis425%1.4720.8
Nuke367%1.0815.7
Cache2100%0.7513.0
Dust210%1.2922.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
88.0%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
537msReaction time
26.1%T opening success
36.5%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
1.6%Flash assists
4.50HE damage / grenade
11.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.1223% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache10–130.0418%14 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0826%14 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0310%6 Sept
inferno10–130.0212%6 Sept
mirage13–160.0221%6 Sept
ancient13–50.0815%6 Sept
mirage4–13-0.069%3 Sept
mirage13–80.1013%3 Sept
mirage3–13-0.0110%3 Sept
cache12–120.0817%1 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0114%1 Sept
cache13–30.0211%31 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0310%31 Aug
mirage7–130.0715%31 Aug
anubis13–60.0017%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.017%23 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0821%23 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0120%23 Aug
mirage13–100.0132%21 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0316%21 Aug
mirage13–60.0318%21 Aug
anubis13–110.0417%21 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0114%19 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0514%19 Aug
anubis16–13-0.0112%18 Aug
cache16–13-0.0211%18 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0114%18 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0013%18 Aug
mirage13–60.1311%10 Aug
dust21–13-0.0124%10 Aug
cache13–6-0.0211%9 Aug
mirage13–90.0015%9 Aug
cache10–130.0215%6 Aug
mirage16–140.0115%6 Aug
mirage5–130.0433%4 Aug
dust216–12-0.0119%4 Aug
anubis8–13-0.045%26 Jul
mirage13–5-0.028%26 Jul
mirage13–20.1313%26 Jul
mirage13–2-0.036%25 Jul
mirage5–130.0012%25 Jul
anubis13–20.0226%25 Jul
mirage13–40.0016%25 Jul
mirage9–130.0322%25 Jul
inferno0–60.000%25 Jul
anubis13–100.017%25 Jul
mirage13–100.0318%25 Jul
mirage8–13-0.087%24 Jul
inferno15–15-0.036%24 Jul
anubis6–130.0115%24 Jul
ancient13–20.0211%24 Jul
cache13–90.0817%23 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0414%23 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0214%22 Jul
cache13–90.0511%22 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0334%22 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0111%22 Jul
cache13–20.0321%21 Jul
cache13–11-0.0012%13 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0422%13 Jul
dust211–13-0.0514%13 Jul
mirage13–10-0.132%12 Jul
dust212–16-0.0822%11 Jul
cache13–90.0214%11 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0416%11 Jul
mirage13–70.0217%11 Jul
mirage13–50.2021%8 Jul
cache13–90.0125%8 Jul
cache9–0-0.027%8 Jul
dust213–100.0523%7 Jul
dust27–13-0.0630%7 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0213%28 Jun
mirage13–10-0.038%28 Jun
mirage13–40.0419%28 Jun
inferno2–4-0.050%25 Jun
mirage6–13-0.096%25 Jun
anubis11–130.0111%25 Jun
mirage4–130.0316%25 Jun
mirage9–130.0112%25 Jun
dust28–130.0617%25 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0712%25 Jun
mirage13–70.0818%24 Jun
dust213–1-0.0231%24 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0713%24 Jun
mirage5–130.0212%24 Jun
ancient13–110.038%22 Jun
dust213–90.1310%22 Jun
mirage13–110.1213%22 Jun
mirage12–120.0213%22 Jun
mirage8–20.1316%22 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0218%21 Jun
mirage13–10.1113%21 Jun
inferno11–130.018%21 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0810%18 Jun
ancient13–50.0718%18 Jun
mirage16–130.0411%18 Jun
mirage11–130.0514%18 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0016%18 Jun
inferno13–90.0622%17 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0120%17 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →