meth

meth — CS2 Stats

76561198810700467[U:1:850434739]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

229Tracked matches57%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating25,478Top 10% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15615 of 221311 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 23 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,478 +3,086 28 Jul14 Sept · 9 days played
22,39225,698peak 25,69828 Jul14 Sept
25,916Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-07-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 220 below peak (25,698)
  • +479 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,522 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmethFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER25,478 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning48
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY513811Last 10051%Win rateWLWLLWWLTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.7pp headshot accuracy · −95ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 983 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim9.3
Utility5.7
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 45 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning4.8
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time600ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy26.9%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 27.1% → last ⅓ avg 26.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 9–2 · nuke, 22 Aug
65%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · dust2, 17 Aug
359msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · nuke, 17 Aug
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 1 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
1011In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA40221855%0.03
nukeB20101050%0.02
mirageA106460%-0.02
dust2C94544%0.00
officeS64267%0.03
vertigoA53260%0.01
overpass32167%-0.04
poseidon2020%-0.07
ancient2020%-0.01
anubis1010%-0.06
cache1010%-0.05
debris1010%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

42Matches
57%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
80.3ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1567%1.0415.9
Dust2933%0.9415.3
Nuke580%0.9813.2
Cache475%1.9018.3
Inferno425%1.0118.5
Anubis367%1.4115.7
Ancient250%1.0410.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.4%Headshot accuracy
41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
525msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
47.4%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
10.25HE damage / grenade
9.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.6562% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo9–5-0.0417%15 Sept
nuke7–9-0.0926%14 Sept
inferno9–50.0419%14 Sept
poseidon5–9-0.1225%14 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0430%14 Sept
inferno9–20.0242%14 Sept
office13–110.0744%13 Sept
office11–130.0039%13 Sept
inferno8–8-0.0015%12 Sept
inferno9–60.0912%10 Sept
nuke8–8-0.048%9 Sept
inferno8–80.0113%9 Sept
inferno7–90.0228%9 Sept
inferno4–9-0.1216%9 Sept
vertigo5–9-0.0911%9 Sept
nuke9–60.1127%9 Sept
nuke7–90.0321%9 Sept
office13–10-0.046%8 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0150%8 Sept
inferno9–3-0.0153%7 Sept
nuke9–4-0.0118%7 Sept
vertigo9–4-0.0136%5 Sept
nuke9–50.0934%5 Sept
inferno9–60.0628%5 Sept
inferno9–70.0429%5 Sept
vertigo9–60.2249%5 Sept
office13–3-0.068%4 Sept
office13–60.1336%4 Sept
dust23–13-0.0131%4 Sept
dust28–13-0.0140%3 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0439%3 Sept
mirage13–100.0224%3 Sept
inferno9–7-0.0815%3 Sept
dust216–12-0.0318%2 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0111%1 Sept
mirage13–00.0128%1 Sept
inferno9–10.1914%31 Aug
inferno6–90.0416%31 Aug
inferno8–80.0426%30 Aug
overpass1–9-0.3340%29 Aug
inferno9–30.2424%29 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0614%28 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0914%28 Aug
inferno23–25-0.0518%27 Aug
dust211–13-0.0214%27 Aug
overpass9–50.0123%26 Aug
nuke9–6-0.0733%26 Aug
cache6–13-0.0516%23 Aug
inferno9–50.0410%23 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0631%23 Aug
nuke9–70.0721%23 Aug
inferno9–60.0425%23 Aug
inferno9–50.1141%23 Aug
nuke9–20.2742%22 Aug
nuke9–20.2815%22 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0422%22 Aug
nuke7–9-0.0136%22 Aug
inferno9–70.1228%22 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1420%22 Aug
inferno4–9-0.1124%22 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0920%22 Aug
vertigo8–8-0.0315%20 Aug
nuke9–70.0319%19 Aug
inferno9–10.2240%19 Aug
mirage10–130.0431%18 Aug
nuke13–60.0627%18 Aug
inferno13–90.0933%17 Aug
inferno8–130.1440%17 Aug
inferno13–110.0725%17 Aug
ancient10–130.0543%17 Aug
dust213–20.1065%17 Aug
nuke13–80.0163%17 Aug
inferno13–40.0228%17 Aug
dust213–110.0143%17 Aug
dust28–130.0239%17 Aug
inferno8–80.0919%16 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0515%16 Aug
inferno13–100.0435%12 Aug
dust213–80.0121%12 Aug
office9–130.0519%12 Aug
nuke8–8-0.1915%4 Aug
inferno8–80.0220%4 Aug
inferno9–60.0829%4 Aug
inferno9–30.1333%4 Aug
inferno6–90.0217%31 Jul
nuke8–8-0.0917%31 Jul
poseidon2–9-0.0140%31 Jul
inferno16–13-0.057%31 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0125%31 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0816%30 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0211%30 Jul
nuke8–8-0.0012%30 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0725%28 Jul
overpass9–10.2118%26 Jul
nuke7–50.0113%26 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0647%25 Jul
debris5–9-0.129%24 Jul
inferno9–40.1137%24 Jul
dust215–15-0.0424%23 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0926%23 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches11-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →