Rainb0w

Rainb0w — CS2 Stats

76561198809172946[U:1:848907218]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,145Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,144Top 50% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#50523 of 238850 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 27 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,144 +3,600 27 Apr21 Sept · 14 days played
18,54422,345peak 22,34527 Apr21 Sept
22,592Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2026-04-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 201 below peak (22,345)
  • +1,753 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,252 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,856 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRainb0wFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER22,144 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning52
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52453Last 10052%Win rateLLWWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −3.1pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility4.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch4.2

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.78 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.2
Utility4.9
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time575ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy15.8%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 18.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–2 · dust2, 24 Aug
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · dust2, 21 Jun
391msFastest reaction time · 7–6 · nuke, 25 Jun
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 24 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
114In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 13mirageWeakest map · 47% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B27131448%0.00
cacheA169756%-0.02
mirageB157847%0.02
infernoA138562%0.01
anubisA116555%0.01
ancientB84450%0.01
nukeA53260%-0.01
overpass31233%-0.01
vertigo1010%0.02
italy110100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

173Matches
50%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
75.3ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22843%1.0815.3
Inferno2658%1.1014.6
Anubis1164%0.9516.6
Mirage911%0.6610.2
Nuke944%1.0815.6
Ancient367%1.2920.0
Overpass1100%1.3320.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
71.9%Counter-strafing
7.1°Preaim
567msReaction time
38.6%T opening success
38.8%CT opening success
0.78Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
6.03HE damage / grenade
4.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.6044% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–130.0213%21 Sept
anubis7–13-0.049%18 Sept
mirage13–110.0317%18 Sept
dust213–3-0.044%18 Sept
cache10–13-0.0415%18 Sept
dust27–13-0.0610%18 Sept
cache2–13-0.0119%13 Sept
vertigo7–130.0210%9 Sept
inferno13–90.0124%6 Sept
cache13–110.0120%6 Sept
overpass7–130.0612%6 Sept
mirage10–130.0423%6 Sept
ancient13–100.0221%3 Sept
nuke16–140.0222%28 Aug
cache13–6-0.0418%28 Aug
anubis13–160.0315%28 Aug
dust22–13-0.050%25 Aug
dust213–110.0718%25 Aug
dust210–130.0419%24 Aug
dust213–20.1824%24 Aug
mirage13–10.0410%24 Aug
dust213–20.0316%23 Aug
dust211–13-0.0423%23 Aug
mirage9–13-0.017%23 Aug
ancient13–80.0513%20 Aug
mirage13–40.0120%20 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0531%19 Aug
ancient10–130.0120%17 Aug
dust27–130.0014%17 Aug
mirage11–130.0117%17 Aug
anubis13–90.0213%17 Aug
dust24–13-0.1023%16 Aug
anubis16–12-0.024%10 Aug
ancient8–13-0.029%9 Aug
dust28–13-0.0322%6 Aug
dust213–70.0623%4 Aug
dust213–100.0719%4 Aug
inferno13–80.0313%30 Jul
ancient13–10.1121%30 Jul
anubis13–100.028%30 Jul
dust21–13-0.0811%30 Jul
mirage3–8-0.0331%17 Jul
anubis9–130.0219%5 Jul
dust213–110.0519%4 Jul
cache13–80.0611%3 Jul
mirage6–130.0311%1 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0020%27 Jun
dust213–100.0528%27 Jun
inferno6–130.0320%27 Jun
nuke7–6-0.037%25 Jun
inferno13–60.0111%25 Jun
dust28–130.0116%25 Jun
cache13–11-0.0517%25 Jun
anubis13–60.1316%24 Jun
dust213–50.0315%24 Jun
mirage9–130.0911%21 Jun
dust20–13-0.07100%21 Jun
italy13–80.0718%21 Jun
anubis7–13-0.059%21 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0227%15 Jun
inferno2–130.1015%15 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0012%11 Jun
nuke13–110.089%11 Jun
cache4–13-0.0637%11 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0414%10 Jun
inferno13–50.1020%10 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0420%10 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0529%1 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0817%1 Jun
inferno13–20.0715%1 Jun
dust213–110.0530%1 Jun
overpass13–80.0215%16 May
dust26–13-0.0920%16 May
mirage12–120.0616%15 May
mirage13–8-0.0225%12 May
mirage13–5-0.040%12 May
anubis13–60.0415%12 May
mirage16–130.1017%9 May
overpass2–13-0.1210%9 May
inferno13–5-0.0317%9 May
dust28–13-0.0416%7 May
inferno5–13-0.0415%7 May
dust211–13-0.0413%7 May
dust213–40.0515%7 May
inferno1–13-0.0219%7 May
dust213–10-0.018%7 May
cache1–8-0.090%4 May
cache5–13-0.1027%4 May
cache7–13-0.0418%3 May
cache5–10.0650%3 May
cache13–80.0222%3 May
dust215–15-0.0311%3 May
mirage13–10-0.0215%3 May
inferno13–7-0.0411%3 May
dust27–20.0136%3 May
cache13–11-0.0318%3 May
cache13–110.0429%3 May
cache13–90.0131%1 May
cache12–12-0.0024%1 May
inferno5–130.0116%27 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →