logbreezy

logbreezy — CS2 Stats

76561198759479869[U:1:799214141]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

120Tracked matches39%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.7 LearningPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 120 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 8 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,464 +960 26 May2 Jul · 11 days played
12,50414,227peak 14,22726 May2 Jul
14,227Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2026-04-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning32
Utility10

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY474310Last 10047%Win rateWLLWLWLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 680ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 683ms

Last 20

  • 6113 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 684ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility1.0
Positioning3.2
Opening Duels0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 37% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 668ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning3.2
Utility1.0
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact1.4

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time659ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 675ms → last ⅓ avg 659ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 12.0% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 9 Jul
60%Best headshot accuracy · 8–2 · mirage, 31 Jul
375msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · office, 15 May
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 4 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 10cacheWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A34191556%-0.04
mirageC26101638%-0.04
cacheD123925%-0.04
ancientS108280%-0.03
infernoD72529%-0.11
nuke42250%-0.07
vertigo41325%-0.04
office21150%-0.04
sanctum110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.6%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.1%Spray accuracy
83.0%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
668msReaction time
16.2%T opening success
37.5%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
1.9%Flash assists
0.00HE damage / grenade
1.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.5528% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4099 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 16.2476% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–4-0.0515%31 Jul
cache10–13-0.0510%31 Jul
inferno1–13-0.098%31 Jul
mirage8–2-0.0560%31 Jul
mirage3–13-0.056%30 Jul
cache13–70.0326%30 Jul
nuke11–13-0.072%24 Jul
ancient15–15-0.069%24 Jul
dust213–60.034%24 Jul
dust28–130.045%22 Jul
dust213–7-0.0715%21 Jul
cache6–13-0.0718%10 Jul
mirage1–13-0.117%9 Jul
mirage13–20.1014%9 Jul
mirage2–13-0.1229%8 Jul
dust212–120.0119%8 Jul
dust211–13-0.0415%2 Jul
nuke8–8-0.083%2 Jul
inferno5–9-0.1015%2 Jul
inferno3–9-0.1443%2 Jul
sanctum9–10.026%2 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0219%27 Jun
dust211–13-0.0411%27 Jun
mirage8–20.059%27 Jun
dust28–13-0.0113%27 Jun
nuke13–8-0.093%25 Jun
mirage3–13-0.067%25 Jun
vertigo8–80.0810%24 Jun
inferno9–4-0.0227%24 Jun
dust26–130.0011%24 Jun
dust213–8-0.0613%23 Jun
inferno9–50.007%23 Jun
ancient7–2-0.0433%23 Jun
dust20–9-0.098%22 Jun
inferno1–9-0.380%20 Jun
mirage6–13-0.080%20 Jun
mirage2–130.024%16 Jun
dust211–13-0.0313%16 Jun
mirage16–12-0.015%16 Jun
dust213–5-0.0614%5 Jun
dust213–100.007%5 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0413%3 Jun
dust20–13-0.0618%3 Jun
mirage1–13-0.090%3 Jun
dust213–6-0.0715%3 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0716%2 Jun
dust29–10.0625%2 Jun
mirage15–15-0.048%1 Jun
cache10–13-0.0711%29 May
dust213–40.0114%29 May
ancient12–12-0.000%29 May
cache13–60.0218%27 May
nuke13–7-0.0413%27 May
dust213–3-0.0650%27 May
mirage13–1-0.0433%26 May
dust27–13-0.0813%25 May
ancient13–10-0.060%25 May
ancient13–3-0.060%25 May
mirage10–13-0.082%25 May
dust213–10-0.068%21 May
dust213–30.0213%21 May
cache12–12-0.0115%20 May
dust212–12-0.0620%20 May
cache1–13-0.1012%20 May
mirage8–13-0.0227%20 May
mirage2–13-0.0922%19 May
dust212–12-0.0514%15 May
office2–13-0.060%15 May
cache13–9-0.0413%15 May
ancient13–9-0.0320%12 May
mirage10–13-0.0112%12 May
mirage7–13-0.0710%12 May
dust27–13-0.069%6 May
cache11–13-0.016%6 May
mirage13–00.0125%4 May
ancient4–0-0.090%4 May
mirage13–5-0.089%4 May
cache11–13-0.0611%4 May
cache5–13-0.0720%1 May
cache3–13-0.0917%1 May
mirage13–60.016%21 Apr
dust213–7-0.067%21 Apr
dust25–13-0.130%21 Apr
mirage10–13-0.1010%14 Apr
dust213–11-0.070%14 Apr
dust213–80.009%13 Apr
office13–11-0.010%11 Apr
mirage8–13-0.037%11 Apr
dust211–7-0.0923%11 Apr
vertigo4–13-0.116%11 Apr
vertigo3–13-0.1221%11 Apr
dust29–2-0.0617%10 Apr
vertigo13–8-0.0219%10 Apr
mirage6–130.0144%10 Apr
ancient13–9-0.029%10 Apr
dust213–40.0426%10 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0418%8 Apr
dust212–8-0.0510%8 Apr
ancient13–20.046%8 Apr
dust212–12-0.038%8 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →