voos

voos — CS2 Stats

76561198450227769[U:1:489962041]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

343Tracked matches52%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,066Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#86207 of 224719 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (15 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 19,066 → 19,066
0Faceit ELO · 1,389 → 1,389
+4Tracked matches · now 343
+6.9ppWin rate · 44.8% → 51.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 51 days played since 10 Oct 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,066 +0 22 Aug18 Sept · 3 days played
19,06619,066peak 19,06622 Aug18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,389 +0 3 Sept18 Sept · 2 observations
1,3891,389peak 1,3893 Sept18 Sept
19,066Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,389Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2025-10-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,389
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 142 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,066
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 934 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGvoosPREMIER19,066 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,389csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning56
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54415Last 10054%Win rateWWWWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · −12ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.10
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility5.8
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.6
Utility5.8
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time619ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms
Headshot accuracy15.0%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.28Best match rating · 10–1 · nuke, 16 Jun
46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · mirage, 16 Jun
492msFastest reaction time · 11–13 · anubis, 22 Jul
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 24 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
710In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2415963%0.01
ancientA2112957%0.03
anubisC167944%0.02
infernoD112918%-0.01
nukeS118373%0.03
cacheA85363%0.06
dust2S75271%0.11
train1010%0.06
overpass1010%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

218Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
75.0ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient5956%1.0514.1
Mirage4050%0.9813.9
Anubis3946%1.1116.4
Inferno2857%0.9013.8
Dust22055%1.3215.4
Nuke1741%1.1117.2
Train650%1.2017.7
Overpass540%0.8210.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
84.3%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
618msReaction time
30.5%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
10.91HE damage / grenade
7.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.4728% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–8-0.0015%8 Sept
mirage13–60.1228%8 Sept
mirage13–20.1111%6 Sept
dust213–110.1119%29 Aug
dust25–130.1518%29 Aug
mirage16–140.0116%22 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0112%22 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0025%22 Aug
ancient14–160.017%22 Aug
inferno7–13-0.028%20 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0511%15 Aug
nuke13–11-0.009%13 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0416%10 Aug
inferno10–130.0227%9 Aug
nuke13–60.0122%9 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0317%9 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0520%8 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0614%8 Aug
cache13–20.1632%8 Aug
cache9–13-0.0116%5 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0610%5 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0413%2 Aug
anubis9–130.017%1 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0419%31 Jul
ancient13–40.0311%30 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0114%27 Jul
nuke16–120.0114%26 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0510%26 Jul
ancient13–9-0.007%26 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0313%24 Jul
anubis6–130.029%23 Jul
ancient13–30.2618%23 Jul
mirage9–130.007%23 Jul
anubis11–13-0.049%22 Jul
mirage9–13-0.075%22 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0414%21 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0110%19 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0316%17 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0410%17 Jul
mirage10–130.006%16 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0211%16 Jul
anubis13–80.0220%16 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0414%14 Jul
inferno3–130.0224%12 Jul
anubis11–130.0111%12 Jul
nuke13–9-0.027%11 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0021%7 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0211%5 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0214%2 Jul
mirage11–130.0323%2 Jul
mirage13–11-0.1014%29 Jun
anubis13–20.1813%26 Jun
cache13–90.0919%26 Jun
ancient5–13-0.057%26 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0010%25 Jun
ancient13–100.1223%25 Jun
anubis13–60.0520%25 Jun
cache13–40.0523%25 Jun
dust213–90.057%24 Jun
anubis13–00.0320%24 Jun
ancient12–160.0210%24 Jun
nuke1–13-0.0715%23 Jun
anubis10–13-0.056%22 Jun
dust29–130.0612%21 Jun
dust213–70.1817%20 Jun
dust213–20.1116%20 Jun
ancient13–10.2028%20 Jun
ancient13–40.1414%19 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0112%19 Jun
ancient12–120.0722%19 Jun
anubis13–40.1520%18 Jun
mirage13–5-0.005%17 Jun
nuke13–20.0514%17 Jun
mirage13–40.0916%17 Jun
inferno7–130.0220%16 Jun
ancient11–130.1118%16 Jun
mirage13–30.1346%16 Jun
anubis12–12-0.0112%16 Jun
nuke10–10.2819%16 Jun
cache12–120.0924%15 Jun
mirage13–90.0616%15 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0211%15 Jun
mirage13–5-0.016%14 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0412%14 Jun
cache6–20.0517%14 Jun
ancient13–7-0.048%14 Jun
anubis13–110.0716%12 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0126%12 Jun
inferno13–70.0418%12 Jun
cache10–13-0.013%12 Jun
ancient13–40.0113%11 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0111%11 Jun
cache13–40.0516%11 Jun
train12–120.0630%10 Jun
nuke13–90.0712%10 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0425%16 May
dust213–60.1114%16 May
mirage13–11-0.087%21 Oct
overpass3–13-0.1115%16 Oct
mirage8–130.0510%10 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →