edixenn

edixenn — CS2 Stats

UA76561198448605520[U:1:488339792]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,395Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,395 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 9 Sep 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,334 +0 30 Aug14 Sept · 5 observations
3,3343,334peak 3,33430 Aug14 Sept
3,334Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2025-09-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,334
  • Next: 3,500 ELO at 3,500 166 to go
  • Reached: 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-30
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-30

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGedixennPEAK ELO3,334csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning57
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52471Last 10052%Win rateLLLLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −4.9pp headshot accuracy · −56ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 381ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 398ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 426ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim9.3
Utility2.8
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning5.7
Utility2.8
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time466ms−62ms
first ⅓ avg 528ms → last ⅓ avg 466ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 25.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 13–5 · dust2, 23 Mar
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · ancient, 26 May
289msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · nuke, 7 Aug
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 7 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 73% over 22anubisWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28141450%0.00
ancientS2216673%0.02
dust2C2181338%0.02
nukeB115645%-0.04
infernoB84450%0.02
anubisD62433%-0.02
vertigo43175%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,643Matches
55%Win rate
1.22Avg K/D
83.2ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage63256%1.2417.1
Ancient52055%1.2416.9
Anubis35953%1.1416.4
Dust220756%1.2215.8
Vertigo15350%1.1916.3
Nuke10047%1.1316.7
Train4240%1.2017.2
Overpass3456%1.1416.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.0%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.6%Spray accuracy
85.2%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
494msReaction time
25.7%T opening success
55.3%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
5.21HE damage / grenade
10.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3901 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.6768% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–13-0.220%28 Aug
vertigo4–13-0.0419%28 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0116%23 Aug
dust23–13-0.0525%23 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0214%20 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0131%20 Aug
ancient13–80.0324%10 Aug
dust213–20.1328%7 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0233%7 Aug
mirage13–80.0717%7 Aug
mirage13–80.0717%7 Aug
dust26–130.0528%7 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0422%7 Aug
ancient13–50.0228%10 Jul
ancient13–50.1322%12 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0118%11 Jun
ancient13–80.0122%11 Jun
dust27–13-0.0641%11 Jun
dust213–11-0.0320%7 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0139%7 Jun
mirage4–130.0018%7 Jun
dust210–130.0721%6 Jun
nuke13–40.0312%6 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0233%6 Jun
dust210–130.0344%1 Jun
dust27–13-0.0513%26 May
inferno8–13-0.0311%26 May
ancient13–50.0231%26 May
mirage8–13-0.0234%26 May
ancient1–13-0.1250%26 May
nuke13–10-0.0131%26 May
mirage8–13-0.0138%25 May
ancient13–60.0421%24 May
vertigo9–50.1120%23 May
ancient13–50.0538%23 May
dust25–13-0.0927%23 May
anubis10–13-0.0621%23 May
ancient11–13-0.0518%21 May
anubis16–130.0327%21 May
inferno8–13-0.0316%21 May
dust210–130.0027%18 May
inferno13–10-0.0214%18 May
mirage13–10-0.0119%18 May
nuke3–3-0.120%15 May
inferno0–13-0.0521%14 May
inferno8–130.0429%12 May
vertigo13–110.0429%12 May
dust29–130.0544%26 Apr
nuke6–9-0.0718%18 Apr
dust26–130.1127%18 Apr
nuke16–130.0624%9 Apr
vertigo8–1-0.0212%9 Apr
mirage6–00.1937%9 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0721%26 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0116%25 Mar
mirage2–13-0.1324%25 Mar
ancient13–60.0133%25 Mar
dust213–11-0.0717%25 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0421%24 Mar
anubis13–90.0131%24 Mar
dust213–6-0.0326%24 Mar
dust213–50.2640%23 Mar
ancient4–130.1327%23 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0621%18 Mar
nuke11–130.0233%17 Mar
mirage16–140.0513%8 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0922%19 Feb
ancient13–90.0020%19 Feb
mirage13–110.0424%14 Feb
dust25–13-0.0329%14 Feb
ancient1–130.0125%14 Feb
ancient13–110.0132%11 Feb
ancient16–140.0123%7 Feb
ancient13–9-0.0513%31 Jan
mirage1–13-0.0722%28 Dec
ancient13–60.1125%17 Dec
mirage13–8-0.0229%11 Dec
inferno9–20.1529%3 Dec
mirage13–50.0821%3 Dec
mirage12–160.0226%22 Nov
inferno13–90.0518%12 Nov
nuke5–9-0.1413%23 Oct
mirage8–130.0119%14 Oct
nuke13–60.0430%27 Sept
nuke13–60.0614%27 Sept
ancient13–60.1626%20 Sept
dust213–5-0.0538%20 Sept
mirage13–5-0.0427%17 Sept
dust29–13-0.0240%15 Sept
mirage13–4-0.0733%15 Sept
dust28–130.1734%15 Sept
mirage13–60.0127%14 Sept
mirage12–120.0125%14 Sept
mirage13–80.0418%14 Sept
mirage10–130.0123%14 Sept
inferno9–60.0818%11 Sept
dust213–90.1229%11 Sept
dust213–6-0.0419%11 Sept
mirage6–130.0329%9 Sept
mirage13–30.0632%9 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

3K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →