ICE_DK

ICE_DK — CS2 Stats

CN76561198444670161[U:1:484404433]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

433Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,793 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,793 → 1,793
+3Tracked matches · now 433
0.0ppWin rate · 43.3% → 43.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 18 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,793 +0 29 Aug – 23 Sept · 3 observations
1,7931,793peak 1,79329 Aug23 Sept
1,793Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-06-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,793
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 208 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGICE_DKFACEITLevel 10 · 1,793 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,793csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning54
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–47Last 10053%Win rateWWLWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · +49ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 522ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim8.9
Utility6.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.4
Utility6.6
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time525ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 542ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 26.5% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–8 · inferno, 7 Aug →
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · cache, 21 Aug →
367msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 16 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 5 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W2Current streak
13–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 71% over 7ancientWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A2917–1259%0.01
infernoB2111–1052%0.04
nukeC188–1044%-0.01
ancientD165–1131%0.00
vertigoS75–271%0.03
cache—43–175%0.04
anubis—33–0100%0.05
mirage—11–0100%-0.06
overpass—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

401Matches
56%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
81.3ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24860%1.1815.9
Nuke3456%1.3016.9
Mirage3250%1.2816.2
Inferno3148%1.1817.3
Ancient2442%1.1617.4
Anubis2143%1.0714.7
Overpass1250%1.0715.0
Vertigo1070%1.4315.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.7%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.1%Spray accuracy
85.5%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
527msReaction time
19.9%T opening success
44.0%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
10.01HE damage / grenade
10.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.8926% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–60.0222%24 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0026%24 Sept →
ancient11–130.0730%21 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0517%21 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0321%20 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0517%20 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0427%20 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0825%16 Sept →
inferno13–50.0433%16 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0524%16 Sept →
inferno13–50.0818%14 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0214%14 Sept →
inferno14–160.0422%9 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0527%9 Sept →
vertigo13–30.0718%9 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0120%7 Sept →
inferno14–160.0525%7 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0321%6 Sept →
dust212–160.0323%6 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0324%5 Sept →
dust213–20.0720%5 Sept →
dust213–110.0125%5 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0223%5 Sept →
nuke8–130.0023%5 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0741%4 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0124%4 Sept →
ancient11–130.0123%3 Sept →
nuke5–130.0229%2 Sept →
dust213–70.0236%2 Sept →
inferno10–130.0924%2 Sept →
ancient13–110.0220%30 Aug →
dust213–100.0724%30 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0418%29 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0118%29 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0124%26 Aug →
dust216–19-0.0427%24 Aug →
anubis13–110.0837%24 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0630%23 Aug →
dust29–130.0332%23 Aug →
anubis13–110.0825%23 Aug →
vertigo6–130.0121%23 Aug →
anubis13–80.0017%21 Aug →
cache13–80.0418%21 Aug →
inferno13–60.0928%21 Aug →
dust212–160.0938%21 Aug →
cache13–70.0848%21 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0318%19 Aug →
ancient17–19-0.0221%19 Aug →
dust213–70.0333%19 Aug →
vertigo13–90.0431%17 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0325%17 Aug →
vertigo13–70.0523%17 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0514%16 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0319%16 Aug →
inferno13–110.0319%16 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0417%7 Aug →
dust213–20.0120%7 Aug →
nuke13–100.0327%7 Aug →
inferno13–80.1523%7 Aug →
nuke13–9-0.0331%5 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0417%5 Aug →
vertigo6–13-0.0120%5 Aug →
ancient7–130.0524%2 Aug →
inferno13–70.0626%2 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0522%2 Aug →
cache5–130.0033%31 Jul →
dust211–130.1032%31 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0516%30 Jul →
dust216–19-0.0333%30 Jul →
nuke7–130.0231%28 Jul →
inferno10–130.0431%28 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.0321%26 Jul →
ancient13–110.0731%26 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0236%26 Jul →
dust213–70.0334%18 Jul →
inferno13–70.0833%18 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.0622%18 Jul →
ancient13–40.0917%18 Jul →
ancient11–130.0228%16 Jul →
inferno6–130.0340%16 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.0415%16 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0326%12 Jul →
nuke13–100.0227%12 Jul →
dust213–40.0034%12 Jul →
nuke10–130.0429%11 Jul →
nuke13–70.0118%11 Jul →
dust211–130.0331%11 Jul →
nuke13–100.0528%11 Jul →
ancient13–110.0628%11 Jul →
ancient13–8-0.0539%9 Jul →
dust213–100.0533%9 Jul →
nuke13–100.0123%9 Jul →
nuke19–16-0.0025%7 Jul →
inferno13–30.0820%7 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0420%7 Jul →
dust213–110.0431%21 Jun →
overpass4–13-0.0423%19 Jun →
dust211–13-0.055%19 Jun →
inferno16–130.0821%19 Jun →
inferno13–90.0527%18 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →