cEng

cEng — CS2 Stats

76561198442145211[U:1:481879483]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

912Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#52867 of 226129 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 16 Feb 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,748 +306 2 Apr5 Apr · 2 days played
21,44221,748peak 21,7482 Apr5 Apr
21,856Peak Premier in tracked matches
47Days played since 2025-02-16

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcEngFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning41
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48502Last 10048%Win rateLLWLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −7.8pp headshot accuracy · +40ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility5.8
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch5.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 616ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.1
Utility5.8
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time622ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 12 Jan
42%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · cache, 6 Jun
430msFastest reaction time · 9–4 · overpass, 2 Apr
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 16 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
312In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 33% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB30151550%-0.00
infernoD2481633%-0.00
dust2B2091145%0.00
anubisS86275%-0.00
nukeS54180%0.02
cache_bA53260%-0.01
cache3030%0.01
ancient21150%-0.04
overpass220100%0.03
train1010%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

149Matches
54%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
84.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2962%1.1215.2
Inferno2857%1.1919.4
Dust21354%1.3316.4
Anubis1242%1.1114.9
Ancient771%1.7116.6
Nuke6100%2.1823.2
Vertigo20%1.0616.5
Overpass20%1.0717.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
76.5%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
616msReaction time
26.7%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
8.62HE damage / grenade
8.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.6878% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–16-0.0312%17 Sept
inferno7–13-0.0522%17 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0320%16 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0624%3 Sept
anubis22–200.0125%3 Sept
dust213–9-0.0918%17 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0420%17 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0335%20 Jun
cache3–13-0.0325%20 Jun
cache3–130.039%19 Jun
train4–13-0.0923%19 Jun
dust213–80.0537%19 Jun
inferno8–130.0023%11 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0136%11 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0228%6 Jun
mirage13–60.0223%6 Jun
cache6–130.0242%6 Jun
nuke9–130.0419%6 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0134%6 Jun
mirage9–130.0423%5 Jun
inferno13–60.0717%5 Jun
mirage15–150.0026%5 Jun
anubis13–80.0020%14 May
dust24–13-0.0223%14 May
mirage11–13-0.0720%13 May
dust25–13-0.0320%13 May
anubis13–4-0.0429%12 May
inferno8–13-0.0528%12 May
anubis9–13-0.027%11 May
mirage16–12-0.0121%11 May
inferno13–8-0.0113%7 May
dust213–8-0.0333%7 May
nuke16–13-0.0118%28 Apr
nuke13–70.0224%16 Apr
mirage13–10.0619%16 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0628%26 Mar
anubis23–25-0.0216%19 Mar
dust214–16-0.0514%18 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0522%18 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0224%13 Mar
nuke13–6-0.0128%13 Mar
cache_b16–140.0228%13 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0216%13 Mar
dust213–70.0230%12 Jan
mirage13–40.1032%12 Jan
dust213–10-0.0129%12 Jan
cache_b7–13-0.0923%12 Jan
dust27–130.0021%8 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0129%8 Jan
anubis13–10-0.0321%6 Jan
inferno13–6-0.0328%15 Dec
dust211–13-0.0323%15 Dec
mirage11–13-0.0527%15 Dec
mirage13–40.0321%8 Dec
anubis13–100.0334%3 Dec
mirage13–8-0.0125%3 Dec
mirage12–16-0.0734%2 Dec
mirage7–13-0.0025%1 Dec
cache_b13–30.0319%1 Dec
dust216–190.0626%28 Nov
mirage10–13-0.0221%28 Nov
inferno10–130.0133%28 Nov
mirage16–14-0.0535%22 Nov
inferno9–13-0.0120%22 Nov
cache_b13–9-0.0128%18 Nov
overpass13–50.0213%18 Nov
dust25–13-0.0726%18 Nov
mirage13–30.0119%29 Oct
inferno11–130.0930%29 Oct
cache_b11–13-0.0126%29 Oct
dust29–130.0925%26 Oct
inferno11–130.0523%26 Oct
mirage14–16-0.0326%26 Oct
dust27–13-0.0223%24 Oct
mirage14–160.0233%8 Sept
dust215–150.0025%8 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0318%5 Apr
mirage13–100.0126%5 Apr
dust29–2-0.0315%2 Apr
mirage8–130.0626%2 Apr
inferno13–10.0419%2 Apr
mirage13–80.0619%2 Apr
overpass9–40.0430%2 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0723%29 Mar
nuke13–60.0926%28 Mar
inferno13–20.0423%28 Mar
mirage13–80.0519%28 Mar
dust213–100.0927%28 Mar
inferno13–20.0627%28 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0430%24 Mar
inferno9–13-0.0222%17 Mar
mirage13–70.0113%17 Mar
dust213–70.0921%15 Mar
mirage11–130.0014%15 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0520%11 Mar
anubis13–40.0618%2 Mar
mirage13–50.0026%1 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0315%24 Feb
inferno10–130.0422%16 Feb
dust213–30.0318%16 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →