jcxn

jcxn — CS2 Stats

CY76561198387169233[U:1:426903505]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,773Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating24,063Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#28067 of 221522 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 30 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,063 +1,626 30 May13 Sept · 34 days played
20,95924,425peak 24,42530 May13 Sept
24,797Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-05-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 362 below peak (24,425)
  • +372 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,009 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 937 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjcxnFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,063 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning61
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52444Last 10052%Win rateWWLWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.0pp headshot accuracy · −25ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 568ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.5
Utility5.2
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.1

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.1
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time608ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms
Headshot accuracy22.5%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 22.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 14 Jul
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · dust2, 18 Jul
445msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · mirage, 11 Jun
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 11 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
W2Current streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 14mirageWeakest map · 45% over 29
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB29131645%0.01
dust2A25141156%0.01
infernoA148657%-0.00
ancientA116555%-0.01
cacheA95456%-0.00
nukeB63350%-0.01
anubisB63350%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 29). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.4%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
85.1%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
601msReaction time
34.7%T opening success
52.8%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
8.8%Flash assists
10.55HE damage / grenade
4.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.7198% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–80.0118%13 Sept
dust213–80.0520%28 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0020%28 Aug
ancient13–100.0120%28 Aug
ancient10–130.0326%28 Aug
cache9–13-0.0423%23 Aug
dust213–90.0217%23 Aug
dust26–130.0212%22 Aug
inferno13–110.0314%22 Aug
mirage8–130.0125%22 Aug
dust213–70.0020%20 Aug
dust213–8-0.0214%15 Aug
mirage11–130.0018%15 Aug
dust211–13-0.0422%15 Aug
mirage13–90.0722%14 Aug
ancient8–130.0815%14 Aug
dust26–130.0421%10 Aug
cache13–40.0625%10 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0030%7 Aug
ancient13–30.0038%6 Aug
mirage13–80.1139%6 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0333%4 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0921%4 Aug
cache13–4-0.0033%4 Aug
dust213–80.0026%3 Aug
mirage7–130.0125%3 Aug
mirage5–130.0221%1 Aug
mirage4–130.0117%31 Jul
dust213–8-0.0022%31 Jul
inferno8–130.0322%31 Jul
dust25–130.0527%31 Jul
dust26–13-0.0813%31 Jul
mirage13–30.0525%31 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0322%29 Jul
cache3–13-0.0720%20 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0419%20 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0329%20 Jul
anubis13–30.0313%18 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0417%18 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0117%18 Jul
nuke13–70.0628%18 Jul
inferno13–70.0525%18 Jul
dust213–30.0928%18 Jul
dust213–110.0423%18 Jul
dust213–9-0.0243%18 Jul
ancient13–70.0317%17 Jul
cache13–8-0.0024%17 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0417%17 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0428%17 Jul
mirage0–13-0.060%16 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0817%16 Jul
inferno13–100.0542%16 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0020%16 Jul
dust213–90.0432%15 Jul
dust213–100.0122%15 Jul
cache4–13-0.0415%15 Jul
mirage13–80.0318%14 Jul
mirage13–20.1221%14 Jul
dust215–15-0.0224%14 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0112%13 Jul
cache11–13-0.018%12 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0221%12 Jul
dust211–13-0.0216%12 Jul
mirage13–100.0636%11 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0115%11 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0112%9 Jul
cache13–7-0.0111%9 Jul
dust213–100.0035%5 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0328%28 Jun
cache8–40.0731%28 Jun
dust212–12-0.0039%21 Jun
inferno12–120.0127%21 Jun
nuke9–130.0124%21 Jun
ancient9–130.0111%21 Jun
dust212–16-0.0323%16 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0119%16 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0430%15 Jun
dust28–130.0324%13 Jun
mirage13–100.0127%13 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0211%12 Jun
dust213–110.0336%12 Jun
mirage14–160.0115%11 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0114%11 Jun
mirage8–13-0.058%11 Jun
dust25–130.0625%11 Jun
mirage13–00.0117%11 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0612%7 Jun
mirage13–100.0319%6 Jun
dust216–120.0126%6 Jun
inferno11–5-0.0233%5 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0318%5 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0523%4 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0520%2 Jun
mirage13–90.0029%2 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0230%2 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0319%31 May
mirage6–13-0.0631%31 May
nuke13–9-0.0120%31 May
ancient3–13-0.0626%30 May
inferno13–10-0.0215%30 May

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches11-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →