Mm a ver duvidas?

Mm a ver duvidas? — CS2 Stats

PT76561198382040245[U:1:421774517]Steam profile ↗

1,418Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,879Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2408 of 13703 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMm a ver duvidas?PREMIER24,879 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning50
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4753Last 10047%Win rateLWLWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.9
Aggression6.0
Utility4.3
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.0
Utility4.3
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time527ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 591ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy23.7%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — vertigo 9–2
132Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
512In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC31131842%0.00
dust2A1810856%0.01
infernoD1551033%-0.03
ancientB115645%0.02
cacheA116555%-0.01
nukeS64267%-0.03
anubisB63350%0.04
vertigo110100%0.15
overpass1010%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

562Matches
54%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
81.8ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15755%1.0315.7
Dust212654%1.1816.8
Anubis8852%1.0416.3
Ancient7054%1.0715.8
Inferno5560%1.2116.9
Nuke2737%0.8914.1
Cache1867%1.1216.3
Overpass633%0.8715.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.2%Spray accuracy
80.4%Counter-strafing
6.8°Preaim
565msReaction time
31.1%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
7.80HE damage / grenade
6.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.0578% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno3–9-0.1711%28 Aug
inferno9–60.0413%28 Aug
inferno1–9-0.0616%26 Aug
vertigo9–20.1526%26 Aug
inferno7–90.0427%26 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0417%25 Aug
dust213–110.0218%25 Aug
ancient13–70.0122%25 Aug
nuke0–13-0.0880%25 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0233%24 Aug
mirage7–130.0635%24 Aug
inferno9–3-0.0243%23 Aug
inferno7–9-0.1521%23 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0212%19 Aug
mirage13–60.0633%19 Aug
mirage5–130.0120%18 Aug
dust214–160.0521%18 Aug
inferno0–5-0.080%18 Aug
anubis13–30.0832%18 Aug
cache7–13-0.0532%18 Aug
mirage6–130.0428%18 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0017%18 Aug
mirage8–130.0133%14 Aug
anubis13–100.0428%13 Aug
nuke13–3-0.0114%13 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0618%13 Aug
ancient13–2-0.0117%13 Aug
ancient9–130.0220%11 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0212%31 Jul
inferno6–9-0.0811%31 Jul
mirage13–160.0120%30 Jul
mirage1–13-0.1019%30 Jul
cache2–13-0.0432%30 Jul
dust213–30.1025%30 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0321%30 Jul
inferno9–70.0122%29 Jul
mirage9–130.0433%28 Jul
dust213–30.1226%25 Jul
mirage13–60.0633%25 Jul
dust23–130.0321%22 Jul
ancient9–130.0521%22 Jul
mirage13–70.0154%22 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0950%21 Jul
cache8–13-0.0125%21 Jul
cache13–60.0522%21 Jul
mirage13–110.0822%20 Jul
mirage13–110.0124%20 Jul
dust28–13-0.049%17 Jul
dust21–13-0.0925%16 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0844%15 Jul
mirage16–130.019%15 Jul
cache13–3-0.0526%15 Jul
dust22–7-0.1213%14 Jul
nuke13–70.0114%14 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0421%14 Jul
dust213–90.024%13 Jul
dust213–70.0223%13 Jul
ancient13–70.0121%13 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0431%13 Jul
dust213–50.0012%12 Jul
cache8–13-0.0821%12 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0025%12 Jul
cache13–70.0324%12 Jul
anubis11–130.0318%11 Jul
ancient10–130.0923%11 Jul
anubis11–130.0112%11 Jul
cache9–130.0024%11 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0431%11 Jul
anubis13–80.1030%11 Jul
mirage11–130.0228%10 Jul
cache13–60.0227%10 Jul
dust26–130.0029%10 Jul
mirage9–130.0420%10 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0317%10 Jul
inferno11–130.0416%10 Jul
inferno13–70.0229%10 Jul
dust213–6-0.0814%9 Jul
mirage7–130.0017%9 Jul
dust213–16-0.0227%9 Jul
cache13–60.0133%9 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0431%9 Jul
ancient13–80.0223%9 Jul
mirage13–100.1217%6 Jul
dust213–80.0212%30 Jun
mirage8–130.0420%30 Jun
mirage7–130.0123%16 Jun
overpass9–130.1022%16 Jun
inferno13–50.0713%15 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0120%15 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0727%4 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0026%27 May
anubis11–130.0111%26 May
cache13–90.0315%25 May
ancient4–130.0421%25 May
nuke4–13-0.0629%25 May
dust213–40.0631%25 May
dust213–40.0736%25 May
ancient13–80.0814%25 May
dust211–130.0231%24 May
nuke13–10-0.0419%24 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →