Changli Nemica — CS2 Stats

76561198378984708[U:1:418718980]

963Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,181Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.9 Developing
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGChangli NemicaFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning45
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52462Last 10052%Win rateWLLWTLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.6
Aggression6.6
Utility5.5
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 646ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.5
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact2.6

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time637ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms
Headshot accuracy14.4%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 14.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — ancient 13–3
132Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
99In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B24131154%-0.01
mirageC24101442%-0.01
infernoD124833%0.03
nukeS118373%0.03
ancientA116555%0.01
anubisD62433%-0.02
cacheA53260%-0.01
vertigoS54180%0.04
train220100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

105,697Lifetime kills
1.28K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
4,888Matches
49.7%Match win rate · Top 25% of tracked players
34.2%Headshot %
18.0%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of tracked players
13,782MVPs
2,181Hours (in match)
5,935Bombs planted
1,793Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,104
AWP20,088
MAC-102,714
MP72,103
MP92,014

Lifetime map wins

11,661inferno
6,460dust2
2,608train
2,578vertigo
2,131nuke
546cbble
331office
324lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

294Matches
51%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
80.3ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1850%1.4818.0
Ancient743%0.9015.0
Dust2520%1.1920.0
Inferno450%1.0621.8
Nuke333%0.8712.7
Anubis367%1.1817.7
Vertigo3100%1.2316.0
Train1100%1.129.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.9%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
78.6%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
646msReaction time
31.3%T opening success
48.3%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
17.88HE damage / grenade
9.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.9157% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.2845% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–60.0918%29 Jul
cache5–13-0.055%29 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0913%14 Jul
dust213–100.0220%14 Jul
dust215–150.0319%12 Jul
cache4–130.0019%12 Jul
ancient4–13-0.068%12 Jul
dust210–130.0015%12 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0017%12 Jul
cache13–11-0.0414%9 Jul
cache13–60.0122%7 Jul
nuke13–110.0016%7 Jul
cache13–70.0314%7 Jul
dust211–130.0710%7 Jul
inferno2–6-0.076%6 Jul
nuke5–130.0410%6 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0214%6 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0212%6 Jul
dust213–7-0.0617%6 Jul
inferno13–50.0214%6 Jul
nuke13–110.1523%1 Jul
dust20–7-0.0118%30 Jun
nuke1–13-0.094%30 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0612%30 Jun
dust23–13-0.0520%30 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0417%29 Jun
dust211–13-0.0216%29 Jun
dust213–10-0.089%29 Jun
anubis15–150.0416%22 Jun
mirage13–80.0721%21 Jun
anubis10–13-0.048%21 Jun
dust23–13-0.0812%21 Jun
inferno13–80.0616%21 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0123%21 Jun
mirage5–130.0313%16 Jun
mirage13–10-0.047%16 Jun
inferno10–130.0415%16 Jun
dust29–13-0.0212%15 Jun
dust213–6-0.019%15 Jun
mirage13–70.0522%9 Jun
ancient13–30.1623%9 Jun
inferno13–90.0515%6 Jun
ancient13–100.005%6 Jun
dust25–130.025%6 Jun
nuke13–100.0428%6 Jun
ancient13–70.1217%20 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0117%19 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0412%19 Feb
dust213–70.0215%15 Feb
nuke13–40.0112%15 Feb
mirage7–130.0010%14 Feb
dust213–80.0216%11 Feb
train13–90.1016%11 Feb
nuke13–50.1128%11 Feb
mirage13–100.0917%1 Feb
ancient10–130.0512%1 Feb
mirage13–50.0618%1 Feb
nuke16–120.0116%1 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0014%11 Jan
inferno10–130.0813%11 Jan
vertigo13–30.023%11 Jan
inferno13–80.1413%11 Jan
mirage13–30.0915%10 Jan
vertigo13–70.106%9 Jan
mirage6–13-0.087%7 Jan
dust213–9-0.0313%7 Jan
ancient13–16-0.0313%7 Jan
ancient11–13-0.055%6 Jan
mirage11–13-0.098%6 Jan
ancient13–7-0.0313%2 Jan
dust213–20.015%2 Jan
anubis13–11-0.0016%2 Jan
mirage13–40.0420%2 Jan
inferno11–130.0419%2 Jan
mirage5–130.0011%2 Jan
vertigo13–7-0.0117%2 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0814%31 Dec
nuke11–13-0.036%29 Dec
dust213–8-0.0229%29 Dec
mirage13–60.0115%29 Dec
vertigo9–13-0.0318%29 Dec
ancient13–40.0122%29 Dec
dust213–7-0.0414%29 Dec
mirage13–90.0515%29 Dec
mirage7–13-0.0626%29 Dec
dust213–110.0613%28 Dec
vertigo16–140.1317%26 Dec
nuke13–110.0421%26 Dec
dust25–130.0216%26 Dec
dust216–13-0.0513%16 Dec
mirage11–13-0.0518%11 Dec
mirage4–13-0.0210%11 Dec
train13–40.0013%24 Nov
mirage5–13-0.0918%20 Nov
dust216–19-0.0221%6 Nov
ancient13–5-0.0111%2 Nov
inferno11–13-0.0125%31 Oct
inferno12–160.038%28 Oct
dust213–110.0026%21 Oct
inferno7–130.0312%18 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →