Ned — CS2 Stats

76561198136876154[U:1:176610426]

797Tracked matches64%Win rate2021Tracked since
1,208Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 Developing
Premier CS Rating11,303Blue band · top ~48% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7818 of 10873 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,065 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNedFACEITLevel 4 · 1,065 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER11,303 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44
Positioning41
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43507Last 10043%Win rateLLWWLWTWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.4
Aggression3.3
Utility4.8
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 683ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4
Positioning4.1
Utility4.8
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact9.8

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time682ms+21ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 682ms
Headshot accuracy12.4%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 12.1% → last ⅓ avg 12.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — ancient 13–11
131Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
63In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 67% over 6ancientWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2191243%-0.04
mirageD2161529%-0.05
infernoB189950%-0.04
nukeB126650%-0.03
ancientD82625%-0.02
cacheB84450%-0.06
overpassS64267%-0.03
anubisA53260%-0.03
train1010%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

21,963Lifetime kills
0.78K/D
1,544Matches
41.3%Match win rate
34.0%Headshot %
8.1%Shot accuracy
2,261MVPs
594Hours (in match)
1,121Bombs planted
323Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,973dust2
1,813inferno
1,068nuke
577vertigo
456train
163cbble
152office
33aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

44Matches
34%Win rate
0.66Avg K/D
60.9ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
8%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage147%0.509.4
Dust2850%0.8012.3
Anubis540%0.7712.4
Nuke540%1.0714.8
Overpass450%0.569.5
Ancient475%0.5910.0
Cache250%0.5210.5
Inferno10%0.255.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.7%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
683msReaction time
17.7%T opening success
46.0%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
7.64HE damage / grenade
7.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.749% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.7158% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–13-0.0816%26 Aug
ancient10–13-0.047%26 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0318%26 Aug
dust213–10-0.0710%23 Aug
inferno7–110.0218%20 Aug
dust213–4-0.0315%20 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0919%20 Aug
nuke13–40.045%17 Aug
nuke6–13-0.035%17 Aug
mirage11–13-0.007%17 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0615%10 Aug
dust212–12-0.0221%10 Aug
dust213–10-0.0828%9 Aug
cache13–4-0.0218%9 Aug
dust213–9-0.0411%9 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0314%6 Aug
dust24–13-0.0622%6 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0214%6 Aug
dust213–5-0.099%2 Aug
mirage10–13-0.100%2 Aug
inferno13–70.019%31 Jul
cache13–5-0.004%31 Jul
ancient7–130.027%31 Jul
mirage13–6-0.017%31 Jul
ancient13–110.089%31 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0814%30 Jul
inferno13–90.007%29 Jul
inferno13–100.0114%29 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0218%29 Jul
dust24–13-0.0519%28 Jul
mirage4–13-0.119%23 Jul
ancient12–160.0015%23 Jul
mirage9–13-0.026%23 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0514%23 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0618%19 Jul
dust213–8-0.0212%19 Jul
cache3–13-0.084%12 Jul
dust215–15-0.024%12 Jul
cache4–13-0.1419%12 Jul
mirage0–7-0.07100%11 Jul
dust213–3-0.0115%11 Jul
nuke13–30.035%11 Jul
inferno10–13-0.026%9 Jul
cache12–16-0.058%9 Jul
cache13–6-0.098%7 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0413%7 Jul
inferno2–6-0.100%6 Jul
nuke5–13-0.059%6 Jul
dust29–130.0118%5 Jul
nuke15–15-0.069%5 Jul
overpass3–13-0.0216%5 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0411%1 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0913%30 Jun
overpass13–8-0.063%30 Jun
dust20–7-0.0713%30 Jun
nuke1–13-0.0815%30 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0714%30 Jun
dust211–13-0.087%29 Jun
anubis7–13-0.084%28 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0418%28 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0110%28 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0323%25 Jun
nuke5–13-0.080%25 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0310%25 Jun
dust213–5-0.0322%24 Jun
overpass16–12-0.0314%24 Jun
nuke13–110.0316%24 Jun
mirage6–13-0.106%23 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0013%23 Jun
overpass16–130.0212%23 Jun
dust23–130.0221%23 Jun
ancient12–12-0.029%19 Jun
cache13–10.0023%19 Jun
anubis13–10-0.014%19 Jun
anubis13–40.026%18 Jun
dust215–15-0.0013%18 Jun
mirage5–13-0.098%16 Jun
dust210–13-0.0616%15 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0115%14 Jun
mirage10–13-0.066%14 Jun
inferno13–60.0019%14 Jun
dust29–13-0.029%12 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0316%12 Jun
inferno16–13-0.0813%9 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0425%9 Jun
ancient13–3-0.0915%9 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0411%7 Jun
mirage4–130.0010%3 Jun
ancient13–16-0.0320%3 Jun
inferno4–9-0.0811%3 Jun
cache6–13-0.085%2 Jun
dust29–13-0.116%2 Jun
nuke13–4-0.0817%30 May
train6–13-0.1119%28 May
anubis13–9-0.027%28 May
overpass5–13-0.098%28 May
inferno5–13-0.054%26 May
inferno4–13-0.0814%26 May
dust213–6-0.0415%26 May
overpass13–10-0.035%25 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →