brooks — CS2 Stats
76561198377691451[U:1:417425723]✓ No bans
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=218), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 10 median |
|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 51.4% | 52.8% |
| Shot accuracy | 13.2% | 13.7% |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.07 | 1.08 |
| Match win rate | 47.3% | 49.2% |
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Sharp aimer
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity
Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Strengths
Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 34 | 16–18 | 47% | 0.01 | |
| B | 19 | 10–9 | 53% | 0.02 | |
| A | 13 | 8–5 | 62% | 0.05 | |
| S | 9 | 7–2 | 78% | 0.04 | |
| D | 9 | 3–6 | 33% | -0.02 | |
| D | 6 | 2–4 | 33% | 0.05 | |
| — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | 0.05 | |
| — | 3 | 1–2 | 33% | 0.05 | |
| — | 2 | 2–0 | 100% | 0.14 | |
| office | — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | 0.11 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 846 | 50% | 1.13 | 16.3 |
| Dust2 | 455 | 53% | 1.23 | 16.4 |
| Ancient | 403 | 54% | 1.18 | 16.3 |
| Inferno | 210 | 59% | 1.20 | 16.5 |
| Anubis | 193 | 51% | 1.15 | 16.6 |
| Nuke | 69 | 42% | 1.11 | 14.8 |
| Vertigo | 50 | 54% | 1.22 | 19.3 |
| Overpass | 48 | 56% | 1.15 | 15.4 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Grenades & UtilityGrenade Lineups →
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4954 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.5946% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3–13 | -0.06 | 8% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.05 | 29% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.02 | 24% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.19 | 27% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.09 | 27% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | 0.02 | 21% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–1 | 0.16 | 21% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.12 | 20% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 2–9 | -0.14 | 5% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.03 | 15% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.05 | 24% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.05 | 20% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.19 | 24% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.03 | 26% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.04 | 10% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.09 | 22% | 25 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.03 | 17% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.02 | 22% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.06 | 20% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.10 | 23% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.06 | 33% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.03 | 31% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.00 | 20% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.10 | 19% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 5–5 | -0.11 | 0% | 22 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.18 | 31% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | 0.00 | 27% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.00 | 20% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 1–13 | -0.03 | 13% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.02 | 14% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.13 | 19% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.08 | 28% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.03 | 24% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.03 | 18% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.15 | 19% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.02 | 18% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 0–3 | -0.02 | 0% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 16–12 | 0.09 | 17% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 22% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.02 | 17% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.06 | 31% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.05 | 20% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.00 | 23% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.06 | 26% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 6–0 | 0.14 | 23% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.06 | 17% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 16–14 | 0.08 | 16% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.02 | 27% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.04 | 23% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.13 | 32% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | 0.00 | 31% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.01 | 35% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–0 | 0.02 | 7% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 9–1 | 0.23 | 39% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.00 | 16% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.03 | 28% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.03 | 28% | 16 Aug → | ||
| office | 13–8 | 0.11 | 25% | 16 Aug → | |
| 8–13 | -0.00 | 20% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.05 | 27% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.04 | 26% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 0–4 | -0.09 | 100% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 25% | 14 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.15 | 30% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.11 | 0% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.12 | 31% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.03 | 23% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.03 | 15% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 0–13 | 0.00 | 0% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.04 | 13% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.01 | 12% | 13 Aug → | ||
| 2–6 | -0.01 | 33% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.11 | 0% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.02 | 35% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.03 | 16% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.05 | 28% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.02 | 18% | 12 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.06 | 17% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.01 | 26% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 5–11 | -0.02 | 11% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.01 | 29% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.05 | 36% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.12 | 20% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.07 | 20% | 11 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.05 | 5% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 1–13 | 0.01 | 13% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.04 | 16% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.05 | 28% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | 0.04 | 22% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.08 | 25% | 10 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.06 | 21% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 13–2 | -0.05 | 12% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 14–16 | -0.05 | 23% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 7–9 | -0.04 | 40% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 5–11 | 0.03 | 11% | 4 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | 0.14 | 29% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.00 | 21% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.08 | 37% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 12–7 | 0.03 | 26% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 0–13 | -0.06 | 33% | 3 Aug → |
Match data via Leetify.