ApeOnTour

ApeOnTour — CS2 Stats

GB76561198368449633[U:1:408183905]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,010Tracked matches72%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,834Top 50% of 197,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#55039 of 244507 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,840 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 25 days played since 18 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,834 +1,303 18 Jul – 11 Sept · 24 days played
18,54421,834peak 21,83418 Jul11 Sept
21,886Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,840Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-07-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,840
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 161 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,834
  • +1,491 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,166 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGApeOnTourFACEITLevel 10 · 1,840 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER21,834 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,840csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning48
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55–43–2Last 10055%Win rateWWWWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −1.6pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 20

  • 13–6–1 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility5.6
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning4.8
Utility5.6
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time604ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.6% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.31Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 25 Aug →
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 4 Sept →
414msFastest reaction time · 0–4 · ancient, 3 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 23 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W4Current streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 27nukeWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2717–1063%0.02
infernoA2314–961%0.05
cacheA138–562%0.03
anubisA106–460%0.01
dust2A95–456%-0.02
mirageD82–625%-0.02
nukeD71–614%-0.03
vertigo—32–167%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

489Matches
55%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
81.6ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno8061%1.2816.5
Ancient6652%1.1416.4
Vertigo4562%1.0715.1
Mirage3551%0.8512.0
Nuke2357%1.0316.0
Anubis2030%0.8012.8
Dust21947%1.1515.5
Overpass1747%0.9515.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.1%Headshot accuracy
35.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
77.7%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
617msReaction time
35.5%T opening success
42.8%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
8.2%Flash assists
10.69HE damage / grenade
6.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.5287% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–100.0020%11 Sept →
inferno13–70.0021%11 Sept →
inferno13–70.0621%11 Sept →
ancient13–70.0511%11 Sept →
ancient13–160.0014%11 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0313%11 Sept →
cache13–9-0.039%9 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.019%9 Sept →
ancient13–80.0111%9 Sept →
inferno13–80.1320%9 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0410%6 Sept →
cache13–70.0514%6 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0813%6 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.118%4 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0327%4 Sept →
ancient13–70.0614%4 Sept →
dust213–50.0931%4 Sept →
cache13–90.0119%4 Sept →
dust24–6-0.0516%3 Sept →
ancient0–4-0.0513%3 Sept →
mirage7–130.0318%3 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0313%2 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0131%2 Sept →
inferno13–80.0213%2 Sept →
ancient13–10.1215%2 Sept →
ancient13–60.052%2 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0417%29 Aug →
vertigo13–100.1013%29 Aug →
ancient13–100.037%29 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0012%29 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.058%28 Aug →
inferno13–30.0821%28 Aug →
ancient13–60.0214%28 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.059%27 Aug →
ancient13–110.0814%27 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.029%27 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0115%26 Aug →
vertigo11–13-0.0114%25 Aug →
inferno13–30.3120%25 Aug →
cache11–130.0513%25 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.019%24 Aug →
cache13–90.0213%24 Aug →
vertigo16–120.0514%24 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0213%24 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0210%21 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0124%21 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0410%14 Aug →
ancient1–13-0.0713%14 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0121%8 Aug →
cache13–70.0725%8 Aug →
inferno13–50.1211%8 Aug →
ancient5–100.0021%6 Aug →
cache9–130.0214%3 Aug →
inferno14–160.0114%3 Aug →
nuke6–1-0.0315%3 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.014%2 Aug →
inferno13–100.1213%2 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0720%2 Aug →
anubis13–70.0522%2 Aug →
ancient13–20.028%28 Jul →
ancient13–110.0325%28 Jul →
cache6–13-0.057%28 Jul →
ancient22–190.0013%28 Jul →
ancient16–130.0217%24 Jul →
inferno13–60.0413%24 Jul →
inferno2–13-0.0525%24 Jul →
inferno13–90.0422%23 Jul →
ancient9–13-0.018%23 Jul →
anubis13–90.0420%23 Jul →
cache13–40.1314%23 Jul →
dust213–8-0.0015%23 Jul →
cache13–00.0321%23 Jul →
ancient8–130.0515%23 Jul →
inferno12–160.0013%22 Jul →
anubis13–9-0.028%22 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.0012%22 Jul →
inferno16–120.0215%22 Jul →
anubis15–150.0413%22 Jul →
inferno13–50.1622%22 Jul →
inferno16–140.0813%22 Jul →
inferno5–130.0319%21 Jul →
dust213–90.0214%21 Jul →
anubis16–140.0214%21 Jul →
inferno9–130.0216%21 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.038%21 Jul →
ancient13–20.0817%21 Jul →
mirage11–130.019%21 Jul →
cache13–40.0511%21 Jul →
mirage1–13-0.0325%21 Jul →
ancient8–130.0716%21 Jul →
ancient13–110.0219%20 Jul →
anubis13–90.0820%20 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0614%20 Jul →
cache7–130.0018%20 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0210%20 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0412%20 Jul →
ancient6–130.0110%18 Jul →
ancient13–30.1413%18 Jul →
dust29–130.0016%18 Jul →
inferno3–13-0.0515%18 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →