нокс

нокс — CS2 Stats

76561198363110035[U:1:402844307]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,751Tracked matches37%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating27,248Top 5% of 211,308 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5156 of 258244 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,483 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Oct 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,248 -904 1 Sept – 17 Oct · 18 days played
27,00329,434peak 29,4341 Sept17 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,483 +0 1 Sept – 2 Sept · 2 observations
1,4831,483peak 1,4831 Sept2 Sept
30,107Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,483Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,483
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 48 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,186 below peak (29,434)
  • -2,164 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,752 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGноксFACEITLevel 7 · 1,483 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER27,248 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,483csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim92
Positioning36
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–51–3Last 10046%Win rateTLWLLLWTTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.7pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 456ms

Last 10

  • 3–4–3 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 456ms

Last 20

  • 8–9–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 469ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim9.2
Utility5.3
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 92 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 56 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Counter-strafing. Only 68% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.2
Positioning3.6
Utility5.3
Mechanics4.0
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact0.7

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time450ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 473ms → last ⅓ avg 450ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–1 · office, 2 Sept →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · office, 2 Sept →
266msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · dust2, 17 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 17 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak
4–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 67% over 6trainWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2210–1245%-0.04
dust2B157–847%-0.04
infernoB136–746%-0.05
anubisB115–645%-0.02
cacheB84–450%-0.01
trainC83–538%0.00
ancientC83–538%-0.02
officeS64–267%0.04
nuke—42–250%-0.01
italy—20–20%-0.02
vertigo—11–0100%0.03
rush_001—11–0100%0.00
shelter—10–10%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

170Matches
56%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
80.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis3664%1.0916.1
Mirage2843%1.0816.0
Dust22148%0.8613.3
Inferno1656%1.0216.9
Nuke1457%1.0416.9
Ancient1070%1.0515.5
Cache967%0.8813.9
Train3100%1.0015.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
57.5%Spray accuracy
68.1%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
457msReaction time
31.6%T opening success
40.1%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
11.12HE damage / grenade
5.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.6344% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Train

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Train callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–120.0211%22 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0426%22 Oct →
cache13–80.0426%22 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0127%22 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0215%17 Oct →
train7–13-0.0118%11 Oct →
train13–110.0124%10 Oct →
train12–120.029%9 Oct →
train12–120.0419%7 Oct →
train13–10.1331%7 Oct →
train5–13-0.0216%7 Oct →
train13–6-0.0413%7 Oct →
inferno8–1-0.0314%6 Oct →
italy1–13-0.046%3 Oct →
office10–130.0143%3 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0714%3 Oct →
inferno13–90.0523%2 Oct →
vertigo13–90.0321%2 Oct →
office8–13-0.0450%1 Oct →
rush_0014–00.0014%28 Sept →
train3–5-0.1329%27 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.095%27 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0029%24 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0311%24 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0632%24 Sept →
mirage13–70.0227%24 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0320%24 Sept →
inferno1–10-0.0430%22 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0311%21 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0215%21 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0121%21 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.1126%21 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0527%21 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.1350%21 Sept →
anubis13–1-0.0430%21 Sept →
dust213–1-0.010%21 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.090%21 Sept →
ancient1–7-0.0617%19 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0535%19 Sept →
dust25–13-0.1026%19 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.1033%19 Sept →
cache13–30.0315%19 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0518%19 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0729%19 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0524%19 Sept →
mirage3–6-0.0822%19 Sept →
anubis13–60.0024%19 Sept →
mirage1–5-0.0614%18 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.1221%18 Sept →
inferno0–4-0.0850%18 Sept →
nuke0–13-0.0024%18 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.150%18 Sept →
mirage13–00.0125%17 Sept →
dust20–13-0.080%17 Sept →
mirage6–00.0429%17 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0120%17 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0811%17 Sept →
dust20–4-0.090%17 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0344%17 Sept →
dust23–13-0.098%17 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0318%16 Sept →
anubis7–130.0035%16 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0429%15 Sept →
mirage13–00.066%15 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0639%13 Sept →
dust213–00.0550%13 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.020%13 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0633%13 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.070%13 Sept →
inferno3–8-0.116%12 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0412%12 Sept →
dust213–10-0.075%12 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0318%12 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0228%12 Sept →
ancient13–70.0726%12 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0536%10 Sept →
mirage13–4-0.0530%10 Sept →
anubis4–00.1125%10 Sept →
ancient0–130.000%10 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0714%10 Sept →
ancient0–12-0.050%10 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0424%7 Sept →
italy6–130.0028%7 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0323%7 Sept →
inferno1–40.0414%6 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0224%6 Sept →
ancient13–80.0320%6 Sept →
inferno13–20.0323%6 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0518%4 Sept →
inferno13–00.0118%4 Sept →
office13–100.1024%4 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0216%3 Sept →
mirage13–70.0113%3 Sept →
anubis6–3-0.0422%3 Sept →
office13–10.1825%2 Sept →
office13–10-0.0360%2 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0120%1 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0018%1 Sept →
office13–80.0122%31 Aug →
shelter2–7-0.0016%31 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches11-Win StreakAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.