goathofer

goathofer — CS2 Stats

AU76561198358302666[U:1:398036938]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,117Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,011Pink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4399 of 9696 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,089 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgoathoferFACEITLevel 10 · 2,089 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER20,011 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning50
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48484Last 10048%Win rateWLLWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8
Aggression5.8
Utility4.6
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.0
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time581ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy28.2%−1.2%
first ⅓ avg 29.4% → last ⅓ avg 28.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.28Best rating — cache 13–0
130Biggest win — cache
8Longest win streak
52In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB30151550%0.05
mirageB26121446%0.02
dust2C135838%0.02
anubisD72529%0.04
nukeS65183%0.03
ancientC52340%-0.02
infernoA53260%0.05
office21150%-0.01
vertigo220100%0.10
fachwerk1010%-0.09
overpass1010%0.06
sanctum1010%-0.06
train110100%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,248Matches
51%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
75.2ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15745%1.2316.8
Dust28050%1.2816.6
Ancient8049%1.1114.7
Anubis4459%1.1016.2
Nuke3253%1.2116.4
Inferno3145%1.0615.4
Train1974%1.2716.8
Overpass1346%1.0720.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.7%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
83.7%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
581msReaction time
29.4%T opening success
54.2%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
7.50HE damage / grenade
13.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.4432% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–7-0.0429%27 Aug
mirage0–5-0.0345%27 Aug
office5–130.0337%24 Aug
cache13–00.2842%24 Aug
dust21–10-0.0129%22 Aug
cache3–13-0.025%22 Aug
cache1–13-0.0541%21 Aug
fachwerk4–13-0.097%21 Aug
office13–8-0.0510%21 Aug
dust213–60.0445%11 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0526%9 Aug
mirage13–40.1156%9 Aug
cache13–90.048%5 Aug
cache13–40.0026%3 Aug
inferno13–30.1430%31 Jul
nuke13–90.0420%31 Jul
cache6–13-0.0225%28 Jul
mirage13–90.0621%28 Jul
cache16–130.0426%28 Jul
anubis3–130.1436%27 Jul
mirage13–60.0620%27 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0235%24 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0229%24 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0147%18 Jul
cache13–90.0622%17 Jul
dust216–12-0.0212%15 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0726%15 Jul
mirage13–70.0445%15 Jul
cache13–60.0424%15 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0421%15 Jul
mirage12–160.0038%15 Jul
dust213–50.0727%15 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0021%14 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0053%14 Jul
cache4–13-0.0123%14 Jul
anubis13–30.1634%14 Jul
cache7–13-0.0535%13 Jul
cache7–13-0.0135%13 Jul
cache5–13-0.0623%13 Jul
dust213–16-0.0216%10 Jul
cache9–130.0537%8 Jul
cache13–90.0770%7 Jul
mirage13–80.0939%5 Jul
dust22–8-0.038%5 Jul
cache5–130.0322%5 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0124%5 Jul
anubis11–90.0119%5 Jul
cache13–30.0616%5 Jul
cache10–130.0730%5 Jul
mirage2–5-0.05100%4 Jul
cache9–13-0.0321%4 Jul
mirage12–120.0225%4 Jul
nuke13–30.0331%4 Jul
dust26–13-0.0147%4 Jul
ancient13–60.0422%4 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0131%3 Jul
cache13–50.0430%3 Jul
cache8–130.1436%1 Jul
nuke13–80.0218%1 Jul
overpass6–130.0625%30 Jun
cache13–60.0622%30 Jun
cache13–110.0415%29 Jun
dust28–13-0.0827%28 Jun
anubis10–130.0724%28 Jun
inferno13–40.0615%28 Jun
inferno4–70.0125%28 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0714%28 Jun
mirage13–110.0320%27 Jun
anubis3–13-0.0525%26 Jun
mirage5–130.0234%24 Jun
dust25–130.1121%24 Jun
vertigo13–110.1428%23 Jun
inferno7–130.0437%23 Jun
nuke0–3-0.020%23 Jun
cache13–40.1464%22 Jun
sanctum2–9-0.0635%21 Jun
dust212–120.0425%19 Jun
cache13–10.1513%18 Jun
vertigo13–20.0721%18 Jun
train13–90.0036%15 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0137%15 Jun
mirage13–100.1027%15 Jun
dust213–40.0845%15 Jun
mirage13–70.2033%15 Jun
cache13–50.0728%14 Jun
cache3–130.0626%14 Jun
dust24–130.0930%13 Jun
mirage13–50.0428%13 Jun
dust213–40.0623%13 Jun
cache13–20.1442%12 Jun
mirage13–2-0.0544%12 Jun
nuke13–60.0657%11 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0234%10 Jun
mirage8–130.0433%10 Jun
cache2–130.0013%10 Jun
nuke13–90.0430%9 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0619%7 Jun
anubis1–13-0.0625%7 Jun
cache9–130.0215%7 Jun
mirage13–90.0923%5 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →