mtjpap1 — CS2 Stats

76561198345714453[U:1:385448725]✓ No bans

4,394Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,059 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmtjpap1FACEITLevel 10 · 3,059 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning50
Utility80

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61381Last 10061%Win rateWWLLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim6.7
Aggression4.2
Utility8.0
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.2

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.82 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 80 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.0
Utility8.0
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time583ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy23.1%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — anubis 13–3
131Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
126In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 83% over 12nukeWeakest map · 36% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2618869%0.00
mirageS2215768%0.02
nukeC145936%-0.01
ancientA138562%0.01
infernoS1210283%0.03
anubisB63350%-0.00
overpass41325%0.02
cache110100%0.08
office1010%0.00
train1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6,409Matches
53%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
79.2ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient71951%1.1015.9
Dust265755%1.1315.6
Mirage52049%1.0815.5
Anubis49454%1.1416.3
Inferno46063%1.2816.1
Nuke23453%1.0315.2
Vertigo10360%1.3517.6
Overpass9050%1.0916.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.7%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
592msReaction time
29.0%T opening success
37.6%CT opening success
0.82Enemies flashed / flash
15.0%Flash assists
11.48HE damage / grenade
10.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.0098% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–50.0418%27 Aug
ancient13–90.0611%17 Aug
mirage10–130.0323%15 Aug
mirage10–130.0526%6 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0015%6 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0513%6 Aug
cache13–80.0822%4 Aug
dust28–13-0.0715%23 Jul
dust213–7-0.0526%21 Jul
dust213–90.0626%10 Jul
inferno13–70.0435%10 Jul
dust213–60.0528%9 Jul
dust29–130.0522%9 Jul
dust213–2-0.0130%9 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0325%2 Jul
nuke11–130.0424%29 Jun
inferno13–70.1120%25 Jun
nuke0–13-0.0738%13 Jun
ancient9–13-0.039%3 Jun
dust213–7-0.0121%30 May
nuke9–13-0.0325%16 May
mirage7–13-0.0421%16 May
mirage7–13-0.0421%16 May
nuke9–13-0.0325%16 May
nuke6–13-0.0427%16 May
overpass5–130.0329%16 May
overpass5–130.0329%16 May
nuke6–13-0.0427%16 May
nuke13–50.0217%15 May
nuke7–130.0422%15 May
ancient5–13-0.0432%15 May
ancient5–130.0118%15 May
inferno13–90.0622%15 May
anubis14–16-0.0114%27 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0223%21 Apr
mirage8–13-0.0625%18 Apr
dust213–8-0.0125%18 Apr
mirage13–100.1125%17 Apr
mirage13–90.0133%15 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0019%15 Apr
dust219–160.0028%13 Apr
dust28–13-0.0029%12 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0216%12 Apr
dust214–16-0.0118%12 Apr
dust213–60.0028%11 Apr
dust213–9-0.0318%11 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0613%11 Apr
inferno13–70.0327%11 Apr
dust213–7-0.0120%10 Apr
inferno13–110.0018%9 Apr
anubis10–13-0.0816%9 Apr
anubis13–30.1529%8 Apr
overpass13–50.0118%8 Apr
dust213–30.0531%8 Apr
mirage13–110.0921%8 Apr
dust214–160.0522%7 Apr
anubis13–110.0228%7 Apr
inferno16–130.0718%6 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0415%6 Apr
mirage13–60.1039%6 Apr
ancient13–10.0927%5 Apr
mirage13–30.0825%5 Apr
overpass15–150.0119%5 Apr
nuke13–50.0231%4 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0323%1 Apr
inferno13–70.0139%1 Apr
mirage13–100.0314%1 Apr
dust29–13-0.0024%1 Apr
ancient13–60.0124%31 Mar
nuke13–100.0136%30 Mar
dust213–8-0.0226%30 Mar
ancient13–70.0231%29 Mar
dust211–130.0421%28 Mar
inferno19–170.0220%20 Mar
office3–130.000%19 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0416%12 Mar
dust213–7-0.0121%12 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0617%12 Mar
mirage13–70.1122%12 Mar
mirage9–130.0727%11 Mar
dust213–10.0924%26 Feb
dust213–100.0020%24 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0532%24 Feb
ancient6–130.0338%24 Feb
dust219–17-0.0332%22 Feb
ancient13–7-0.0326%20 Feb
ancient13–11-0.1114%18 Feb
nuke13–90.0533%18 Feb
inferno13–3-0.0024%15 Feb
mirage13–100.0228%13 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0119%12 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0219%10 Feb
dust213–110.0123%9 Feb
inferno13–60.0818%6 Feb
dust219–16-0.0227%2 Feb
ancient13–20.079%27 Jan
train5–13-0.0618%19 Jan
dust214–16-0.038%17 Jan
inferno13–16-0.0236%14 Jan
mirage13–90.0333%8 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →