Joop

Joop — CS2 Stats

AU76561198345433618[U:1:385167890]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,361Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,883Top 50% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~12.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#92759 of 238651 tracked
FaceitLevel 4 · 991 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,361 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 30 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,883 +3,467 30 Jul22 Sept · 33 days played
13,00419,709peak 19,70930 Jul22 Sept
Faceit ELO: 991 +0 2 Sept22 Sept · 3 observations
991991peak 9912 Sept22 Sept
19,709Peak Premier in tracked matches
991Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-07-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 991
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 60 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 826 below peak (19,709)
  • -252 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,117 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJoopFACEITLevel 4 · 991 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER18,883 · Purple bandPEAK ELO991csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning48
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47485Last 10047%Win rateLLLLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · −7ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 484ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility4.4
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch1.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.8
Utility4.4
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time520ms−83ms
first ⅓ avg 603ms → last ⅓ avg 520ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–6 · nuke, 22 Aug
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 22 Aug
367msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 13 Aug
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 24 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L5Current streak
49In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 10ancientWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2291341%0.00
infernoA1911858%0.00
cacheC1971237%-0.01
ancientD1651131%0.00
anubisS108280%-0.00
mirageC94544%-0.01
nukeA53260%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

15Matches
40%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
54.3ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
67%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage450%1.249.8
Ancient333%0.619.0
Vertigo367%0.8210.3
Inferno250%1.2316.5
Anubis10%1.1432.0
Nuke10%0.509.0
Overpass10%0.294.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
77.8%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
508msReaction time
25.8%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
8.52HE damage / grenade
3.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.6608 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.8037% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–130.0214%18 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0118%7 Sept
mirage9–130.0115%7 Sept
ancient2–13-0.0117%7 Sept
inferno10–130.0615%7 Sept
mirage13–90.0115%3 Sept
dust25–13-0.0017%3 Sept
cache13–50.0135%30 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0814%30 Aug
inferno16–140.0116%30 Aug
dust26–13-0.0328%30 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0412%30 Aug
dust213–30.0721%30 Aug
inferno13–90.0221%28 Aug
mirage7–130.0423%27 Aug
anubis13–60.0710%27 Aug
cache8–13-0.0011%27 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0412%26 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0511%26 Aug
dust213–70.0319%26 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0215%24 Aug
dust25–13-0.0712%24 Aug
cache13–50.029%24 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0218%24 Aug
cache6–13-0.0614%24 Aug
ancient13–20.0114%24 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0318%23 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0112%23 Aug
ancient13–60.1123%23 Aug
nuke13–50.1139%22 Aug
cache13–80.029%22 Aug
dust216–14-0.0013%22 Aug
nuke13–60.1519%22 Aug
inferno13–70.1113%22 Aug
nuke11–13-0.1210%22 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0618%21 Aug
anubis13–7-0.028%21 Aug
cache13–16-0.019%21 Aug
ancient13–100.0311%20 Aug
cache13–80.0411%20 Aug
cache10–13-0.068%19 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0011%19 Aug
dust213–30.1134%19 Aug
dust210–130.0423%18 Aug
cache15–150.0224%18 Aug
anubis14–160.0110%18 Aug
inferno13–100.0314%17 Aug
cache13–10-0.0410%17 Aug
dust210–13-0.0819%17 Aug
inferno9–13-0.016%17 Aug
mirage13–20.0325%16 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0218%16 Aug
cache9–130.0018%16 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0213%14 Aug
anubis13–80.058%14 Aug
dust213–40.0337%14 Aug
inferno13–60.087%14 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0410%13 Aug
inferno5–13-0.074%13 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0810%13 Aug
dust26–130.0322%13 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0112%13 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0015%13 Aug
dust25–13-0.0528%12 Aug
cache8–13-0.0727%12 Aug
cache7–13-0.0321%12 Aug
inferno15–150.0016%11 Aug
dust213–100.0225%11 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0116%11 Aug
dust28–130.0018%11 Aug
anubis13–2-0.028%10 Aug
dust213–9-0.0418%10 Aug
ancient3–130.038%10 Aug
inferno13–10-0.036%9 Aug
dust213–70.0421%9 Aug
cache13–30.036%7 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0615%5 Aug
dust210–13-0.0226%5 Aug
inferno13–40.0110%5 Aug
nuke13–80.0220%5 Aug
cache13–50.0521%5 Aug
dust213–11-0.0215%4 Aug
cache7–13-0.0311%4 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0715%4 Aug
dust26–13-0.0515%3 Aug
dust27–130.0415%3 Aug
ancient7–130.0517%3 Aug
dust210–130.0310%3 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0114%2 Aug
anubis13–80.0213%2 Aug
cache8–13-0.0415%1 Aug
ancient11–130.0417%1 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0813%31 Jul
cache11–13-0.0513%31 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0510%31 Jul
dust24–13-0.0421%31 Jul
ancient8–1-0.018%31 Jul
mirage12–120.0013%30 Jul
cache11–130.0320%30 Jul
anubis13–70.0310%30 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →