et t'es content ?

et t'es content ? — CS2 Stats

FR76561198329713845[U:1:369448117]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,477Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,785Top 25% of 190,010 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23429 of 238575 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,579 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 16 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,785 +2,334 16 Jun21 Sept · 11 days played
22,45124,999peak 24,99916 Jun21 Sept
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,579Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-06-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,579
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 172 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-19
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 214 below peak (24,999)
  • +1,347 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,072 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 215 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-19
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGet t'es content ?FACEITLevel 8 · 1,579 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,785 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,579csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning61
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50428Last 10050%Win rateTWWLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −5.3pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.2
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.1
Utility6.2
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time569ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy17.0%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–7 · nuke, 31 Jul
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–6 · dust2, 15 Jul
414msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · dust2, 24 Aug
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 9 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 88% over 8mirageWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B26121446%-0.01
cacheB2091145%0.01
infernoA148657%0.00
mirageD113827%-0.02
anubisA85363%-0.01
nukeS87188%0.04
ancientB63350%0.01
train31233%0.01
overpass21150%-0.03
boulder1010%0.04
vertigo110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

424Matches
53%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
77.2ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust28450%1.0315.6
Inferno7659%1.0515.0
Anubis6352%0.9915.7
Vertigo2850%0.9313.9
Nuke2658%1.0016.5
Mirage2556%0.9515.4
Ancient1560%0.9113.4
Overpass633%0.8212.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.8%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
571msReaction time
42.6%T opening success
40.7%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
10.91HE damage / grenade
9.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache15–150.0412%21 Sept
ancient13–90.0110%21 Sept
dust213–7-0.0016%19 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0611%19 Sept
mirage8–130.0314%19 Sept
dust27–13-0.0510%19 Sept
anubis13–110.0219%18 Sept
dust23–13-0.088%18 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0212%18 Sept
inferno19–170.0116%18 Sept
inferno7–130.0013%18 Sept
nuke13–90.0224%16 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0914%12 Sept
dust210–13-0.0015%12 Sept
inferno13–70.0217%10 Sept
dust213–90.1020%10 Sept
dust211–13-0.0319%9 Sept
inferno13–20.0523%9 Sept
dust210–13-0.0116%9 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0220%8 Sept
nuke13–100.0231%7 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0410%26 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0310%26 Aug
cache10–13-0.029%26 Aug
dust213–160.0126%26 Aug
cache13–70.0319%26 Aug
ancient9–130.0022%25 Aug
inferno13–40.0528%25 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0419%25 Aug
dust215–150.0222%25 Aug
nuke13–80.0319%25 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0222%25 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0315%25 Aug
cache13–11-0.0218%25 Aug
dust213–11-0.0415%25 Aug
dust25–13-0.0413%24 Aug
cache13–110.0516%24 Aug
ancient13–20.1114%24 Aug
anubis13–70.0618%19 Aug
dust213–16-0.0410%13 Aug
cache12–16-0.0310%13 Aug
nuke13–100.0415%13 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0212%10 Aug
dust213–8-0.0338%8 Aug
nuke13–70.1420%31 Jul
cache12–120.0616%28 Jul
dust25–130.0117%28 Jul
anubis11–130.0321%28 Jul
cache9–13-0.0513%27 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0118%24 Jul
cache10–13-0.1010%18 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0014%18 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0216%18 Jul
cache12–12-0.0417%17 Jul
cache13–6-0.0524%17 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0348%17 Jul
nuke8–130.0922%16 Jul
dust20–6-0.02100%15 Jul
dust26–13-0.0537%15 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0620%14 Jul
mirage13–60.0217%14 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0715%14 Jul
cache6–13-0.0519%13 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0524%13 Jul
dust213–100.0320%13 Jul
cache13–80.0634%13 Jul
dust213–5-0.0513%12 Jul
inferno13–8-0.037%12 Jul
mirage13–100.0317%12 Jul
mirage11–130.0020%12 Jul
dust213–7-0.0318%11 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0319%11 Jul
cache13–70.0113%11 Jul
boulder12–120.0423%11 Jul
inferno13–110.0222%11 Jul
dust213–70.0327%9 Jul
inferno12–12-0.017%8 Jul
cache13–110.0619%8 Jul
cache13–70.0319%8 Jul
cache12–120.0423%7 Jul
dust213–70.1124%7 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0419%2 Jul
dust213–7-0.0223%2 Jul
cache12–4-0.0442%2 Jul
inferno9–90.106%1 Jul
dust213–10-0.0425%26 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0119%23 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0613%23 Jun
cache6–130.0911%22 Jun
train9–13-0.0621%22 Jun
vertigo13–80.0513%20 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0623%20 Jun
cache10–130.0319%19 Jun
train6–13-0.0112%19 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0414%19 Jun
dust213–7-0.0414%19 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0120%17 Jun
dust23–13-0.0827%17 Jun
train13–80.0924%17 Jun
dust215–15-0.0223%16 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →