Fubbz

Fubbz — CS2 Stats

VG76561198328095293[U:1:367829565]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

398Tracked matches46%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingClutch Specialist
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,610 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,610 → 1,610
+1Tracked matches · now 398
+3.8ppWin rate · 42.3% → 46.2%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 12 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,115 -468 19 Mar6 Jul · 15 days played
14,95718,324peak 18,32419 Mar6 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,610 +0 31 Aug8 Sept · 3 observations
1,6101,610peak 1,61031 Aug8 Sept
18,324Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,610Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-03-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,610
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 141 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFubbzFACEITLevel 8 · 1,610 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,610csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning50
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39538Last 10039%Win rateWWLLWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · +84ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 609ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 635ms

Last 20

  • 7112 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 593ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch SpecialistLate-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+3.9 against its own average).

Aim6.0
Utility3.8
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.9
Clutch9.4

Reliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning5.0
Utility3.8
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact3.7

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time606ms+60ms
first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · vertigo, 5 Apr
37%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · nuke, 2 Apr
406msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 19 Mar
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 5 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
39In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9ancientWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheD1641225%-0.02
dust2B147750%-0.01
overpassC145936%-0.02
infernoD103730%-0.02
mirageB105550%-0.01
nukeB105550%-0.03
anubisS96367%-0.02
ancientD81713%-0.04
vertigoD62433%0.02
poseidon2020%0.03
fachwerk110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

52Matches
62%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
81.7ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

67%1v1 clutch win
12%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage475%1.0212.8
Ancient475%1.2616.5
Dust2367%1.0519.3
Overpass2100%1.3618.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
32.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
610msReaction time
38.6%T opening success
45.6%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
7.94HE damage / grenade
6.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4202 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.6189% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–10-0.0210%17 Sept
dust213–8-0.0024%4 Sept
inferno9–130.0219%31 Aug
dust210–13-0.0420%6 Aug
mirage13–70.0213%6 Aug
cache6–13-0.0820%4 Aug
fachwerk13–10-0.0214%3 Aug
cache9–13-0.059%3 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0111%3 Aug
dust213–50.0311%3 Aug
cache13–5-0.0211%3 Aug
ancient6–13-0.039%2 Aug
mirage13–70.0620%2 Aug
cache12–16-0.0411%2 Aug
cache2–13-0.0722%1 Aug
overpass2–13-0.0811%1 Aug
vertigo12–120.018%1 Aug
cache7–13-0.0121%29 Jul
dust212–120.0218%29 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0314%25 Jul
cache12–120.1114%6 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0230%6 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0712%6 Jul
dust213–100.0116%6 Jul
cache13–8-0.0225%17 Jun
cache13–70.0320%27 May
dust216–12-0.0124%14 May
cache10–130.0221%14 May
cache12–12-0.0317%13 May
cache2–13-0.019%7 May
vertigo2–13-0.0519%3 May
cache7–13-0.0228%3 May
cache5–13-0.1125%3 May
cache5–13-0.0716%2 May
overpass13–3-0.0027%17 Apr
overpass7–9-0.0315%12 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0710%11 Apr
mirage3–13-0.045%11 Apr
ancient14–16-0.0611%10 Apr
inferno3–8-0.050%10 Apr
nuke13–16-0.0714%10 Apr
dust24–13-0.0915%10 Apr
ancient8–13-0.093%10 Apr
overpass13–6-0.0219%10 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0521%9 Apr
overpass8–13-0.019%9 Apr
dust213–90.0216%6 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0514%6 Apr
overpass11–80.0015%6 Apr
anubis13–7-0.005%5 Apr
inferno11–13-0.056%5 Apr
nuke13–2-0.0228%5 Apr
dust215–15-0.0016%5 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0118%5 Apr
anubis13–100.0118%5 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0315%5 Apr
vertigo13–50.1319%5 Apr
anubis13–100.048%4 Apr
dust29–13-0.0220%4 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0211%4 Apr
overpass9–13-0.0516%4 Apr
mirage13–10-0.067%3 Apr
anubis13–90.0222%3 Apr
dust213–6-0.0216%3 Apr
mirage13–7-0.0112%3 Apr
nuke8–13-0.0737%2 Apr
mirage2–13-0.0310%2 Apr
anubis11–13-0.068%2 Apr
overpass8–13-0.088%2 Apr
mirage8–130.0217%2 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0310%2 Apr
anubis13–3-0.0210%2 Apr
dust213–110.0012%2 Apr
inferno13–70.0015%2 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0523%2 Apr
ancient14–160.0219%31 Mar
anubis13–7-0.0410%25 Mar
overpass14–16-0.0413%25 Mar
vertigo5–130.0026%23 Mar
overpass7–130.0321%20 Mar
poseidon7–90.0617%20 Mar
dust27–13-0.0611%20 Mar
mirage13–5-0.0212%20 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0315%19 Mar
anubis2–13-0.059%19 Mar
vertigo13–20.0214%19 Mar
overpass4–13-0.0311%19 Mar
inferno13–90.0314%19 Mar
ancient13–11-0.024%19 Mar
dust211–130.0119%19 Mar
poseidon8–80.0015%19 Mar
nuke13–50.0513%19 Mar
inferno13–160.0312%19 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0823%19 Mar
mirage7–130.0025%19 Mar
anubis12–12-0.0510%19 Mar
overpass3–13-0.0024%16 Mar
vertigo10–13-0.0124%15 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0210%12 Mar
overpass13–100.057%12 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →