Dready

Dready — CS2 Stats

DE76561198325786405[U:1:365520677]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,264Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating24,259Top 25% of 197,133 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#28432 of 245593 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 24,259 → 24,259
+1Tracked matches · now 1,264
−2.0ppWin rate · 55.6% → 53.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 12 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,259 +4,605 15 Jul – 15 Sept · 25 days played
18,86024,259peak 24,25915 Jul15 Sept
24,259Peak Premier in tracked matches
29Days played since 2026-07-12

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,259
  • +1,855 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 741 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDreadyFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER24,259 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning62
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateWLLWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · +16ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.0
Utility6.4
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 580ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.2
Utility6.4
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time573ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 642ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy15.3%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 13 Jul →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · mirage, 31 Jul →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 15 Jul →
13–2Biggest win · vertigo, 14 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
5–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 65% over 17dust2Weakest map · 35% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C207–1335%0.01
ancientS1711–665%0.02
nukeB178–947%0.04
mirageA149–564%0.03
cacheA116–555%0.01
infernoC94–544%0.02
anubisA74–357%-0.03
vertigo—43–175%-0.03
train—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

568Matches
54%Win rate
1.24Avg K/D
85.3ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4351%1.0315.3
Dust23262%1.2317.5
Nuke2365%1.4120.1
Ancient1958%1.2318.5
Anubis1527%0.9715.7
Inferno1242%1.0519.7
Vertigo1267%1.1719.4
Train667%1.2414.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
39.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.4%Spray accuracy
81.3%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
580msReaction time
36.7%T opening success
58.2%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
8.64HE damage / grenade
14.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.7431% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–100.0218%14 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0124%14 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0618%10 Sept →
ancient13–40.0812%10 Sept →
inferno13–100.108%6 Sept →
mirage13–60.059%6 Sept →
nuke5–130.0518%6 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0212%5 Sept →
nuke13–100.065%5 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0210%5 Sept →
anubis13–40.034%5 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.066%5 Sept →
cache13–40.0815%5 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.027%4 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0420%4 Sept →
mirage13–80.1016%4 Sept →
ancient13–80.109%4 Sept →
mirage13–90.0011%4 Sept →
nuke11–130.0819%4 Sept →
vertigo9–6-0.0222%29 Aug →
mirage9–00.0731%29 Aug →
mirage10–130.0423%25 Aug →
ancient13–40.0712%25 Aug →
cache13–160.0017%25 Aug →
vertigo13–2-0.0422%14 Aug →
mirage12–12-0.0018%14 Aug →
train13–2-0.0118%13 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0418%9 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0418%9 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0224%9 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0415%9 Aug →
dust215–150.0812%8 Aug →
inferno13–90.0215%8 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0314%8 Aug →
dust210–130.0115%8 Aug →
ancient13–100.0313%8 Aug →
nuke13–40.086%8 Aug →
cache10–130.0116%5 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0521%5 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0513%4 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0124%4 Aug →
vertigo13–6-0.0517%4 Aug →
ancient13–20.1113%3 Aug →
dust213–80.0716%31 Jul →
dust25–13-0.036%31 Jul →
cache13–110.0020%31 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0318%31 Jul →
mirage11–130.0511%31 Jul →
mirage13–60.0136%31 Jul →
inferno16–190.0212%31 Jul →
dust213–90.0621%30 Jul →
ancient13–6-0.0422%30 Jul →
nuke9–130.0115%30 Jul →
cache13–30.0118%30 Jul →
anubis13–110.0315%30 Jul →
dust213–100.1318%30 Jul →
inferno13–6-0.058%28 Jul →
cache13–30.0226%28 Jul →
anubis13–4-0.0530%26 Jul →
nuke13–40.018%26 Jul →
dust28–13-0.003%26 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0415%26 Jul →
nuke13–40.1221%26 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0421%25 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0517%25 Jul →
dust213–110.0921%25 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0326%25 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0331%24 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.0212%22 Jul →
ancient13–100.009%22 Jul →
inferno4–13-0.0035%22 Jul →
ancient3–13-0.0123%22 Jul →
inferno11–130.0422%20 Jul →
ancient13–30.019%20 Jul →
vertigo11–13-0.0019%20 Jul →
ancient14–16-0.0214%19 Jul →
cache5–13-0.0620%19 Jul →
mirage13–50.0129%19 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0615%19 Jul →
nuke13–20.0319%19 Jul →
anubis5–13-0.056%18 Jul →
dust213–70.0517%18 Jul →
inferno13–80.0811%18 Jul →
nuke13–90.0711%18 Jul →
dust27–130.0624%16 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0110%16 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.0114%16 Jul →
cache13–110.0413%16 Jul →
mirage13–70.0711%16 Jul →
ancient13–100.0017%15 Jul →
cache10–130.0011%15 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0122%15 Jul →
nuke13–90.1420%14 Jul →
nuke13–40.1819%13 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0514%12 Jul →
ancient4–13-0.029%12 Jul →
cache13–70.0011%12 Jul →
mirage13–30.1511%12 Jul →
ancient13–30.0812%12 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0116%12 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →